reverse splitter Forum
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:31 am
reverse splitter
160/3.88
strong softs
cardozo w/scholarship?
GULC PT?
strong softs
cardozo w/scholarship?
GULC PT?
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: reverse splitter
Is it possible to retake the Law School Admission Test?
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:31 am
Re: reverse splitter
not much of a possibility. so...Tom Joad wrote:Is it possible to retake the Law School Admission Test?
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:15 pm
Re: reverse splitter
Why not?
Don't waste a good GPA - you could do much better. But Cardozo probably, GULC probably not (check out Law School Predictor). Don't rely too much on softs.
Don't waste a good GPA - you could do much better. But Cardozo probably, GULC probably not (check out Law School Predictor). Don't rely too much on softs.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:07 am
Re: reverse splitter
Unless you've used up your 3 tries it's always possible, and easily the best advice here.adsssd wrote:not much of a possibility. so...Tom Joad wrote:Is it possible to retake the Law School Admission Test?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: reverse splitter
Ugh, that bites if you took it 3 times already.adsssd wrote:not much of a possibility. so...Tom Joad wrote:Is it possible to retake the Law School Admission Test?
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:31 am
Re: reverse splitter
cardozo probable w/ scholarship?iowalum wrote:Why not?
Don't waste a good GPA - you could do much better. But Cardozo probably, GULC probably not (check out Law School Predictor). Don't rely too much on softs.
Law School Predictor puts me at 40% for GULC pt??
And I took it twice, I might be able to get 162, but its risky.
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:15 pm
Re: reverse splitter
I think it's a risk worth taking. Why do you think you can only get a 162? What kind of studying did you do on your other tests? Your options really open up with even a 164/165.adsssd wrote:cardozo probable w/ scholarship?iowalum wrote:Why not?
Don't waste a good GPA - you could do much better. But Cardozo probably, GULC probably not (check out Law School Predictor). Don't rely too much on softs.
Law School Predictor puts me at 40% for GULC pt??
And I took it twice, I might be able to get 162, but its risky.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:31 am
Re: reverse splitter
I took a course first time, then studied for month second time and took 7 PTs. I got like abt -10 on LG.iowalum wrote:I think it's a risk worth taking. Why do you think you can only get a 162? What kind of studying did you do on your other tests? Your options really open up with even a 164/165.adsssd wrote:cardozo probable w/ scholarship?iowalum wrote:Why not?
Don't waste a good GPA - you could do much better. But Cardozo probably, GULC probably not (check out Law School Predictor). Don't rely too much on softs.
Law School Predictor puts me at 40% for GULC pt??
And I took it twice, I might be able to get 162, but its risky.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:07 am
Re: reverse splitter
LG is the most learnable section. Get the LG Bible and you can make a massive improvement there.adsssd wrote:I took a course first time, then studied for month second time and took 7 PTs. I got like abt -10 on LG.iowalum wrote:I think it's a risk worth taking. Why do you think you can only get a 162? What kind of studying did you do on your other tests? Your options really open up with even a 164/165.adsssd wrote:cardozo probable w/ scholarship?iowalum wrote:Why not?
Don't waste a good GPA - you could do much better. But Cardozo probably, GULC probably not (check out Law School Predictor). Don't rely too much on softs.
Law School Predictor puts me at 40% for GULC pt??
And I took it twice, I might be able to get 162, but its risky.
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: reverse splitter
That SCREAMS retake. LG is the most learnable section and a month is nothing. Hit the preptests hard for 4 or 6 months and you it may be worth a few hundred thousand dollars to you.adsssd wrote:I took a course first time, then studied for month second time and took 7 PTs. I got like abt -10 on LG.iowalum wrote:I think it's a risk worth taking. Why do you think you can only get a 162? What kind of studying did you do on your other tests? Your options really open up with even a 164/165.adsssd wrote:cardozo probable w/ scholarship?iowalum wrote:Why not?
Don't waste a good GPA - you could do much better. But Cardozo probably, GULC probably not (check out Law School Predictor). Don't rely too much on softs.
Law School Predictor puts me at 40% for GULC pt??
And I took it twice, I might be able to get 162, but its risky.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:31 am
Re: reverse splitter
i did lg bible and was getting averaging -6 or -7. i breezed through 1st 3 games, but 4th was hardest I had ever seen. I spent 8 min on it and couldn't even set it up. I guessed all 7.
I havent studied since Feb test and for whatever reason, the last time I can take test is this june.
I havent studied since Feb test and for whatever reason, the last time I can take test is this june.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:31 am
Re: reverse splitter
160 is a 12 pt improvement from the 1st test I took. I have studied, albeit there is obviously room fro improvement. I'm just frustrated by the whole thing. I was pting 160-163. I can only really retake in February, if applying next cycle.tfleming09 wrote:Oh, so you didn't try? Got it.adsssd wrote:
I took a course first time, then studied for month second time and took 7 PTs. I got like abt -10 on LG.
Retake the test and go to a T14 with money.
Don't go to 'Bozo.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: reverse splitter
You said you only took 7 PT before your 2nd attempt. That does not sound, at least to me, like adequate preparation or topping out your potential. I took 50+ PT before I took the LSAT. You can learn the test, you just need to learn it. 7 won't cut it. And like people have said, LG are the MOST learnable section and can become pretty easy and reflexive if you find efficient and intuitive ways to diagram them.adsssd wrote:160 is a 12 pt improvement from the 1st test I took. I have studied, albeit there is obviously room fro improvement. I'm just frustrated by the whole thing. I was pting 160-163. I can only really retake in February, if applying next cycle.tfleming09 wrote:Oh, so you didn't try? Got it.adsssd wrote:
I took a course first time, then studied for month second time and took 7 PTs. I got like abt -10 on LG.
Retake the test and go to a T14 with money.
Don't go to 'Bozo.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: reverse splitter
Study hard, hit the October LSAT -> Go to a good school, become rich, live it up.
Don't study -> Go to 'Bozo, become literally buried in 150k+ of debt with virtually no job prospects.
I rather would do a six month stint in Sam Quentin than be 150k in debt with no means of escape.
Don't study -> Go to 'Bozo, become literally buried in 150k+ of debt with virtually no job prospects.
I rather would do a six month stint in Sam Quentin than be 150k in debt with no means of escape.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login