3.83, 167 military and economic disadvantage
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:07 am
Where will this get me?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=176087
I'm an Eagle Scout and have been recognized for extensive community service. Plus obviously leadership positions obviously. Idk if Eagle Scout still holds that much respect but it used to.mountaintime wrote:maybe in at Cornell or Boalt if you have great softs (assuming you're not URM). apply pretty widely across the T25 to have lots of options, including some nice scholarships.
lol, that crap won't help you. what did you do in the military and for how long? that's what i meant by softs.kroakstool wrote:I'm an Eagle Scout and have been recognized for extensive community service. Plus obviously leadership positions obviously. Idk if Eagle Scout still holds that much respect but it used to.mountaintime wrote:maybe in at Cornell or Boalt if you have great softs (assuming you're not URM). apply pretty widely across the T25 to have lots of options, including some nice scholarships.
Ya. I've been in four years and held numerous leadershippositions, but no combat experiencemountaintime wrote:did you hold a leadership position? were you in combat? were you there for more than just 2 years? if your answer to 2 or more of those questions is "yes," then you will get some sort of boost. most law students are pussies. you probably aren't. that's diversity. more diversity than URM usually is, and law schools know it.
Let me guess, SIGINT? SIGINTers love opsec.kroakstool wrote:Maybe it sounds like a cop out, but I can't tell you what I do in the military. Unfortunate I know, but it's for opsec.
you're good to go. apply to 7-14 plus a couple lower ranked schools you would consider attending (mostly so you have scholarship options).kroakstool wrote:Ya. I've been in four years and held numerous leadershippositions, but no combat experiencemountaintime wrote:did you hold a leadership position? were you in combat? were you there for more than just 2 years? if your answer to 2 or more of those questions is "yes," then you will get some sort of boost. most law students are pussies. you probably aren't. that's diversity. more diversity than URM usually is, and law schools know it.
ha -- i was thinking the same thing when i read the opsec post. i'm a sigint officer with worse stats than the OP (3.56/161), and applied to a wide range of schools. i'll post on this thread again when i get some decisions.Kring345 wrote:Let me guess, SIGINT? SIGINTers love opsec.kroakstool wrote:Maybe it sounds like a cop out, but I can't tell you what I do in the military. Unfortunate I know, but it's for opsec.
Clearly you dont really understand OPSEC. The fact that Field X, MOS Y, or job description Z exists is public information. If you work for SOCOM, you still have a job to perform that is public information. If you work for CIA assassin team, you still have a field.
Im sorry, but in my field... intel (gasp... opsec... didnt know the military had intelligence folks?).... people are obsessed with opsec for all the wrong reasons. And ignore opsec when they should be enforcing it. One of my pet peeves. Not trying to be a dick. Honestly, best of luck in your cycle. I truly mean that. I responded to your other (identical) post about your chances and where to apply.