*
- daesonesb
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:18 pm
Re: 167/3.19 Science background Non-traditional Chances
Fine I'll try.
Last edited by daesonesb on Sun May 06, 2012 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: 167/3.19 sci background Non-trad best chances for BigLaw?
UIUC you can get...WUSTL probably not anymore if they are raising their median to 168. I would also try GW, W&L, W&M, maybe Fordham...BC/BU like higher GPAs usually.
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: 167/3.19 sci background Non-trad best chances for BigLaw?
Mizz wrote:Thanks for the feedback. Fordham or GW would be my preference, but it seems like I may be 50/50 there or get WL and maybe get in.
Would there be any benefit to trying to applying at either of these places for PT instead?
I wouldn't pay sticker at either of those places. GW PT recently got a lot harder to get into. Not sure about Fordham.
- snapdragon
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:34 am
Re: 167/3.19 sci background Non-trad best chances for BigLaw?
Mizz wrote:Thanks for the feedback. Fordham or GW would be my preference, but it seems like I may be 50/50 there or get WL and maybe get in.
Would there be any benefit to trying to applying at either of these places for PT instead?
I don't have a hard science background, but I got into GW PT this cycle with a 3.1 / 167 and into Fordham PT off the waitlist.
Just so you know, WUSTL and UIUC were mostly not taking 167 splitters this year. 168+ was necessary (I got rejected at WUSTL, WLed at UIUC.)
PM me if you have any specific questions.. my LSN is the same as my username here.
Return to “What are my chances?�
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests