160lsat /2.13 gpa Forum
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:35 am
160lsat /2.13 gpa
what are my chances:
IIT Chicago-Kent PT
Loyola Chicago PT
Hofstra PT
Depaul PT
Rutgers Camden PT
Albany PT
Baltimore PT
NY Law PT
Loyola New Orleans PT
John Marshall PT
Tulsa
Suffolk
IIT Chicago-Kent PT
Loyola Chicago PT
Hofstra PT
Depaul PT
Rutgers Camden PT
Albany PT
Baltimore PT
NY Law PT
Loyola New Orleans PT
John Marshall PT
Tulsa
Suffolk
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
Please don't go to law school unless you retake and get a 168+
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
lol, the people on this board can be really harsh, but this is probably TCR, as bluntly stated as it was.ndirish2010 wrote:Please don't go to law school unless you retake and get a 168+
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
The 160 is fine, but what's with that GPA? Were there extenuating circumstances or something? If not, why do you think you will be able to perform in law school if you barely had a GPA that allows you to graduate?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:35 am
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
my ugpa was a 2.6, LSDAS converted it to a 2.13.
I worked my entire college career. Started out on the pre med track, failed calc, chem, bio and physics. I switched majors to economics and made mostly B's for the remainder of school.
I graduated two years ago, been taking evening courses towards a masters degree in economics. I am still working full time as a paralegal, and maintaining a 3.7 gpa in my masters program.
just wanted to see what the consensus was on my chances , got a pretty clear idea now....
I worked my entire college career. Started out on the pre med track, failed calc, chem, bio and physics. I switched majors to economics and made mostly B's for the remainder of school.
I graduated two years ago, been taking evening courses towards a masters degree in economics. I am still working full time as a paralegal, and maintaining a 3.7 gpa in my masters program.
just wanted to see what the consensus was on my chances , got a pretty clear idea now....
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KingMenes
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:15 pm
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
LSbum wrote:my ugpa was a 2.6, LSDAS converted it to a 2.13.
I worked my entire college career. Started out on the pre med track, failed calc, chem, bio and physics. I switched majors to economics and made mostly B's for the remainder of school.
I graduated two years ago, been taking evening courses towards a masters degree in economics. I am still working full time as a paralegal, and maintaining a 3.7 gpa in my masters program.
just wanted to see what the consensus was on my chances , got a pretty clear idea now....
I don't think 3 or 4 responses is a consensus.
You should go to http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com.
You'll need to perfect your statement of purpose, polish your resume, and make sure your LORs are stellar.
Only you know the hidden cost of not pursuing your dream.
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
You failed math and three different sciences before realizing that maybe pre-med was a bad idea? No clue before then that it just wasn't your thing?LSbum wrote:Started out on the pre med track, failed calc, chem, bio and physics.
- bport hopeful
- Posts: 4930
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:09 pm
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
This prolly isnt true.KingMenes wrote:You'll need to perfect your statement of purpose, polish your resume, and make sure your LORs are stellar.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 160lsat /2.13 gpa
Retake or don't go. You won't get into a school worth going to with those numbers.