2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: 2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Postby Dany » Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:56 pm

paulinaporizkova wrote: i feel betrayed

paulinaporizkova
Posts: 2494
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm

Re: 2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Postby paulinaporizkova » Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:59 pm

ClaytonR wrote:
paulinaporizkova wrote:
bk1 wrote:I'd do UVa ED then UMich ED then GULC FT/PT ED in succession. (Assuming no work experience.)


this. start with the better schools and work your way down - you can probably get UVA/Mich/NU with that LSAT, which all offer better job prospects than GULC

edit: NU with work experience. will you be taking at least a year off from UG? if so, i'd go with NU ED. amazing firm placement stats, badass big city.


You're being too generous. No chance I get Michigan or UVa OOS. I feel like GULC is my best bet...especially if I interview and tell the dean I'll attend if admitted (giving up all my leverage, I guess, but getting me into a t14).


actually no, i'm not. look at panda's example from above. also whoever else said that apps are somewhat holistic for #s around yours is right - for example, panda got into UVA with similar #s as fatduck, but fatduck did not (boo.) if you ask for advice and then turn around and say the advice is bad, don't ask for it in the first place.

edit: this is entirely conditional on a 170 score, so....why am i still posting in this thread?

User avatar
Marionberry
Posts: 1302
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:24 pm

Re: 2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Postby Marionberry » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:12 pm

FWIW, I'm in at GULC ED full time with a 171, 3.0. I do not know of any non-urms who have gotten in this cycle with less than a 3.0

And as others have pointed out I don't think any of these school accept imaginary LSAT scores, so this thread is pointless.

ClaytonR
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: 2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Postby ClaytonR » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:31 pm

eskimo wrote:
paulinaporizkova wrote: i feel betrayed


Weird...no one seemed to have any problem giving "hypo" advice ITT.

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=146875

User avatar
fatduck
Posts: 4186
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm

Re: 2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Postby fatduck » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:33 pm

ClaytonR wrote:
eskimo wrote:
paulinaporizkova wrote: i feel betrayed


Weird...no one seemed to have any problem giving "hypo" advice ITT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 9&t=146875


hypotheticals are frowned upon in general but they are 100x worse when you don't disclose up-front that they're hypothetical

ClaytonR
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: 2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Postby ClaytonR » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:38 pm

fatduck wrote:
ClaytonR wrote:
eskimo wrote:
paulinaporizkova wrote: i feel betrayed


Weird...no one seemed to have any problem giving "hypo" advice ITT.

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=146875


hypotheticals are frowned upon in general but they are 100x worse when you don't disclose up-front that they're hypothetical


They're not worse at all, really. For some reason people feel "betrayed".

IMAGINE IF YOU NEVER EVEN KNEW.

User avatar
fatduck
Posts: 4186
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm

Re: 2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle?

Postby fatduck » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:39 pm

ClaytonR wrote:They're not worse at all, really. For some reason people feel "betrayed".

IMAGINE IF YOU NEVER EVEN KNEW.


yea good point i don't know anyone who dislikes being lied to




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest