3.97/169&172

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
jeremysen
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:07 am

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby jeremysen » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:26 am

Mike12188 wrote:Oh shit, you busted out "your mom" :shock:


Wrong again, I busted IN your mom.

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby r6_philly » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:27 am

That is not a good thing to say or think about considering the average age of a law school applicant...

jeremysen
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:07 am

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby jeremysen » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:28 am

r6_philly wrote:
jeremysen wrote:
Mike12188 wrote:Oh shit, you busted out "your mom" :shock:


Wrong again, I busted IN your mom.


That is not a good thing to say or think about considering the average age of a law school applicant...


You're right r6, she's prolly ugly as fk

User avatar
Mike12188
Posts: 792
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:07 am

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby Mike12188 » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:30 am

Now he's trying to recruit some people to his side. R6 don't fall for it. :lol:

User avatar
Ragged
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby Ragged » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:32 am

jeremysen wrote:
Ragged wrote:
jeremysen wrote:
Ragged wrote:165 maybe not, but Columbia gave a fee waiver to a 170/3.4

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/efont/jd


Now step back for a second and think to yourself, "Doesn't my using 170/3.4 as an example lend support to his argument?"


No it doesn't. No way non-URM 170/3.4 gets accepted. Or lets say that its so improbable that its pretty much impossible and not even worth the 12$.



Mike's UVA experience satisfies your argument. But nonetheless, 170/3.4 would get a fee waiver over a 165. To that end, merit based fee waivers indicate that the 170/3.4 has a higher chance of admittance than the 165.


By exactly .0000000000000000000001523345%. Fair enough.


Mike12188 wrote:Now he's trying to recruit some people to his side. R6 don't fall for it. :lol:


Haha! I didn't think of that. Now he'll have the whole 170 Club arguing for him. Maybe he isn't as dumb as we think.

jeremysen
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:07 am

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby jeremysen » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:33 am

Mike12188 wrote:Now he's trying to recruit some people to his side. R6 don't fall for it. :lol:


Yeah ok. 3.2, stop talking. From now on, I'm gona call you "3.2 whose fugly mom I banged"

jeremysen
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:07 am

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby jeremysen » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:34 am

Ragged wrote:By exactly .0000000000000000000001523345%. Fair enough.


Bustin out the stats book again

User avatar
Mike12188
Posts: 792
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:07 am

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby Mike12188 » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:34 am

jeremysen wrote:
Mike12188 wrote:Now he's trying to recruit some people to his side. R6 don't fall for it. :lol:


Yeah ok. 3.2, stop talking. From now on, I'm gona call you "3.2 whose fugly mom I banged"


From now on I'm gonna call you "guy who calls me 3.2 whose fugly mom he banged". Later brah. enjoy trolling.

Edit: if you're not trolling, may god have mercy on you.

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby r6_philly » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:37 am

Ragged wrote:
Mike12188 wrote:Now he's trying to recruit some people to his side. R6 don't fall for it. :lol:


Haha! I didn't think of that. Now he'll have the whole 170 Club arguing for him. Maybe he isn't as dumb as we think.


Someone is arguing about something? :D

I thought it was just friendly banter between buddies...

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby FuManChusco » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:08 pm

I stopped paying attention to this thread for a while. I am dumbfounded. Jeremy, you are a troll.

jeremysen
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:07 am

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby jeremysen » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:18 pm

FuManChusco wrote:I stopped paying attention to this thread for a while. I am dumbfounded. Jeremy, you are a troll.


confused why so many T14 rejects have gravitated towards this thread. Fuman, you have a 2.6. I'm surprised you can type.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 3.97/169&172

Postby FuManChusco » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:24 pm

jeremysen wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:I stopped paying attention to this thread for a while. I am dumbfounded. Jeremy, you are a troll.


confused why so many T14 rejects have gravitated towards this thread. Fuman, you have a 2.6. I'm surprised you can type.


Haven't heard that gem before. You're clearly a troll so I won't waste my time. I see a ban in your future.




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: roboyle and 1 guest