180/2.32 + Unusual background

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
User avatar
Jack Smirks
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am

Re: 180/2.32 + Unusual background

Postby Jack Smirks » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:54 pm

OP do you have any pics or anything of your time in captivity so you can prove to these idiots that your story is real. I'm sure at some point during those 7 years you took a picture with your captors. You know, for ransom or just... the memories?

User avatar
nematoad
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:06 pm

Re: 180/2.32 + Unusual background

Postby nematoad » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:55 pm

seespotrun wrote:
lisjjen wrote:Say hi to Hemmingway while you're burning in hell for this. Even if he is trolling, it's not worth the risk that he is not.


Who bears the risk of posting highly sensitive (patently unbelievable) information on the internets? Also, I'm agnostic, and the concept of hell is less believable than this poorly executed flame's story.


i tend to find agnostics just as annoying as the super religious.

User avatar
lisjjen
Posts: 1242
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am

Re: 180/2.32 + Unusual background

Postby lisjjen » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:57 pm

kalvano wrote:
lisjjen wrote:However, the risk that we might be further traumatizing someone who had a terrible life experience makes it not worth a couple of jokes.



Hi, welcome to the internet. You must be new here.


Oh, and now the trolling comes back full circle.

I would welcome you to sunshine and real human interaction, but considering your 6,000 posts, the chance we're going to get you from out in front of the internet is slim to none so a discussion of empathy and compassion is not likely to be fruitful.
Last edited by lisjjen on Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: 180/2.32 + Unusual background

Postby Bildungsroman » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:57 pm

nematoad wrote:
seespotrun wrote:
lisjjen wrote:Say hi to Hemmingway while you're burning in hell for this. Even if he is trolling, it's not worth the risk that he is not.


Who bears the risk of posting highly sensitive (patently unbelievable) information on the internets? Also, I'm agnostic, and the concept of hell is less believable than this poorly executed flame's story.


i tend to find agnostics just as annoying as the super religious.


We're not ruining an otherwise enjoyable tread with that nonsense debate again.

User avatar
seespotrun
Posts: 2395
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am

Re: 180/2.32 + Unusual background

Postby seespotrun » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:58 pm

nematoad wrote:
seespotrun wrote:
lisjjen wrote:Say hi to Hemmingway while you're burning in hell for this. Even if he is trolling, it's not worth the risk that he is not.


Who bears the risk of posting highly sensitive (patently unbelievable) information on the internets? Also, I'm agnostic, and the concept of hell is less believable than this poorly executed flame's story.


i tend to find agnostics just as annoying as the super religious.


I more of a beer man myself.

User avatar
lisjjen
Posts: 1242
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am

Re: 180/2.32 + Unusual background

Postby lisjjen » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:58 pm

Bildungsroman wrote:
nematoad wrote:
seespotrun wrote:
lisjjen wrote:Say hi to Hemmingway while you're burning in hell for this. Even if he is trolling, it's not worth the risk that he is not.


Who bears the risk of posting highly sensitive (patently unbelievable) information on the internets? Also, I'm agnostic, and the concept of hell is less believable than this poorly executed flame's story.


i tend to find agnostics just as annoying as the super religious.


We're not ruining an otherwise enjoyable tread with that nonsense debate again.


The doofy looking Pokemon has a strong point.

User avatar
nematoad
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:06 pm

Re: 180/2.32 + Unusual background

Postby nematoad » Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:00 am

Bildungsroman wrote:
nematoad wrote:
seespotrun wrote:
lisjjen wrote:Say hi to Hemmingway while you're burning in hell for this. Even if he is trolling, it's not worth the risk that he is not.


Who bears the risk of posting highly sensitive (patently unbelievable) information on the internets? Also, I'm agnostic, and the concept of hell is less believable than this poorly executed flame's story.


i tend to find agnostics just as annoying as the super religious.


We're not ruining an otherwise enjoyable tread with that nonsense debate again.


damn and i was getting pumped.




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], liam13661 and 1 guest