chances

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
User avatar
JenDarby
Posts: 13291
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am

chances

Postby JenDarby » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:01 pm

I went a little fee waiver crazy and applied to:

Cornell
UCLA
U Texas
USC
Washington U
U Illinois
BU
Notre Dame
U Iowa
BC
William & Mary
U Georgia
Fordham
George Mason
Lewis & Clark
Loyola LA

Should I throw in apps to anywhere else in hopes of $?
Last edited by JenDarby on Sun Apr 19, 2015 2:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
im_blue
Posts: 3276
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby im_blue » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:10 pm

I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
Last edited by im_blue on Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby FuManChusco » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:11 pm

Cornell, UCLA, UT are hard to predict. Gut tells me UT is a ding since you're OOS. Maybe in at one of Cornell/UCLA and in at USC. Probably in everywhere else.

User avatar
PinkCow
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby PinkCow » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:31 pm

You're applying to Lewis and Clark and NOT UW?

User avatar
JenDarby
Posts: 13291
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby JenDarby » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:37 pm

chip3341 wrote:You're applying to Lewis and Clark and NOT UW?


UW was one of the few schools from 14-50 not kind enough to give me a fee waiver, I suppose I could email them and request one. I'm currently living in the NW, and not extremely interested in staying here though, so Lewis & Clark was somewhat of a $12 whim.

ATR
Posts: 1119
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby ATR » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:40 pm

im_blue wrote:I would add:

Cardozo

Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.

User avatar
PinkCow
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby PinkCow » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:41 pm

Yeah I'm not certain but I don't think UW gives fee waivers. Oh well, you've got a lot of other potential locks/good options on there.

User avatar
PinkCow
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby PinkCow » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:42 pm

atresia wrote:
im_blue wrote:I would add:

Cardozo

Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.



Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

User avatar
JenDarby
Posts: 13291
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby JenDarby » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:44 pm

im_blue wrote:I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo



Do you think I have any shot at money at GW?

User avatar
im_blue
Posts: 3276
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby im_blue » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:48 pm

JenDarby wrote:
im_blue wrote:I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo



Do you think I have any shot at money at GW?

No, but you'll definitely get in, and might be able to negotiate with possible $ offers from BU/BC/Fordham.

User avatar
im_blue
Posts: 3276
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby im_blue » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:51 pm

chip3341 wrote:
atresia wrote:
im_blue wrote:I would add:

Cardozo

Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.



Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

+1, Cardozo gives nearly full rides for those numbers.

User avatar
JenDarby
Posts: 13291
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby JenDarby » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:52 pm

chip3341 wrote:
atresia wrote:
im_blue wrote:I would add:

Cardozo

Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.



Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


She* :wink:

There is a lot of TLS hate for Cardozo it seems. I should probably throw this out there, I'm not biglaw or bust.

ATR
Posts: 1119
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm

Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences

Postby ATR » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:58 pm

JenDarby wrote:
chip3341 wrote:
atresia wrote:
im_blue wrote:I would add:

Cardozo

Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.



Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


She* :wink:

There is a lot of TLS hate for Cardozo it seems. I should probably throw this out there, I'm not biglaw or bust.

I'm sure you're legal job or bust, though.




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest