CG614 wrote:Ahh, yes. It is hard for me to keep track of all the errors the OP has littered throughout this thread. I would add one small caveat, just to be an ass, but it is at least 25% of the matriculants have LSATs at or below the 25th. Hypothetically, assuming the median is different, all the matriculants up to the median point could have the 25% LSAT. Sorry, I will not be a dick anymore, as I agree with you.
Haha you are quite right. the 49th percentile could very well be 167, in theory. That's a basic error, but I think my brain might have overheated while trying to understand this:
masterthearts wrote:I know for a fact that the law school belonging to my alma mater accepted students last year with lsat as low as 160 last cycle. I know because I emailed and asked for the RANGE of scores of admitted students. The dean of admissions emailed me back and I am assuming is a reliable source!
masterthearts wrote:Well you are correct, I implied that 25% of UVA matriculants had lsats below the 25th percentile for UVA (not the 25th percentile of lsat test takers),.
OP: I'm not bashing you, but if you're going to take extremely strong positions that are categorically false, you can't expect people to play too nicely.