179/4.0

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
User avatar
BrownBears09
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:48 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby BrownBears09 » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:29 pm

cornell wrote:
inchoate_con wrote:ha-ha, you're going fit right in wherever you attend! I really doubt anyone is offended, but good luck.


dude did you even see page two? a person said I should burn in hell if my post is real, and you don't think that's offensive? btw I don't need social advice from you honestly, I'm comfortable with how I fit in.


You seem extremely fixated on the fact that people find you slightly offensive. You'd think with a 4.0/179 you would realize why you're being interpreted that way...

User avatar
JazzOne
Posts: 2938
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby JazzOne » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:31 pm

I'm going to have to go against the grain and say that Cornell is one of the better trolls on TLS.

User avatar
cornell
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:21 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby cornell » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:32 pm

BrownBears09 wrote:
cornell wrote:
inchoate_con wrote:ha-ha, you're going fit right in wherever you attend! I really doubt anyone is offended, but good luck.


dude did you even see page two? a person said I should burn in hell if my post is real, and you don't think that's offensive? btw I don't need social advice from you honestly, I'm comfortable with how I fit in.


You seem extremely fixated on the fact that people find you slightly offensive. You'd think with a 4.0/179 you would realize why you're being interpreted that way...


I'm not fixated on that, in fact I'm only interested in reasonable responses to my question. It was the fact that a few people posted very offensive words at my question that I found uncalled for.

User avatar
BrownBears09
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:48 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby BrownBears09 » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:34 pm

JazzOne wrote:I'm going to have to go against the grain and say that Cornell is one of the better trolls on TLS.

User avatar
cmu
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby cmu » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:43 pm

1. you'll get into anywhere you apply, after seeing your numbers and work experience at an investment bank.
2. I think you might get half rides at places ranked above top 5.
3. You will most likely get full rides at schools such as Cornell and other similar ranked schools.
4. I would recommend blanketing all top 20 schools, apply to all of them, since no one here can really tell you how much money you'll get from them, just apply to all and you'll be fine.

User avatar
clintonius
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby clintonius » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:49 pm

Error logging on to status checker: assess denied

User avatar
seespotrun
Posts: 2395
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby seespotrun » Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:35 pm

clintonius wrote:Error logging on to status checker: assess denied

:lol:

Call admissions and ask the school's IT to access your log-on problems.

User avatar
PinkCow
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby PinkCow » Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:56 pm

Dude with those numbers schools should be applying to you.

Just wait it out.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:32 am

JazzOne wrote:I'm going to have to go against the grain and say that Cornell is one of the better trolls on TLS.


seriously. this is turning into a good one. I thought we derailed this with the anteater in the denim jacket and the monstrous bong, but against all odds cornell has taken control of the thread again.

User avatar
JazzOne
Posts: 2938
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby JazzOne » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:32 am

FuManChusco wrote:
JazzOne wrote:I'm going to have to go against the grain and say that Cornell is one of the better trolls on TLS.


seriously. this is turning into a good one. I thought we derailed this with the anteater in the denim jacket and the monstrous bong, but against all odds cornell has taken control of the thread again.

I mean, we could shut it down if we wanted to. lol
It's not that hard to get a thread locked.

Edit: Plus, I think this goes to prove that many TLSers respond to threads without reading what the hell is going on.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:37 am

JazzOne wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
JazzOne wrote:I'm going to have to go against the grain and say that Cornell is one of the better trolls on TLS.


seriously. this is turning into a good one. I thought we derailed this with the anteater in the denim jacket and the monstrous bong, but against all odds cornell has taken control of the thread again.

I mean, we could shut it down if we wanted to. lol
It's not that hard to get a thread locked.

Edit: Plus, I think this goes to prove that many TLSers respond to threads without reading what the hell is going on.


at this point he deserves to keep trolling people.

User avatar
cmu
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby cmu » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:40 am

JazzOne wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
JazzOne wrote:I'm going to have to go against the grain and say that Cornell is one of the better trolls on TLS.


seriously. this is turning into a good one. I thought we derailed this with the anteater in the denim jacket and the monstrous bong, but against all odds cornell has taken control of the thread again.

I mean, we could shut it down if we wanted to. lol
It's not that hard to get a thread locked.

Edit: Plus, I think this goes to prove that many TLSers respond to threads without reading what the hell is going on.


I agree, I think Cornell asked a legitimate question, that's why I gave him a serious response. And with all seriousness, I think some people on TLS are just too sensitive when they see a 179/4.0, and there's a tendency to dismiss people with such high numbers.

User avatar
Mike12188
Posts: 792
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:07 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby Mike12188 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:42 am

I don't think he'll ever be able to create a thread where eit isn't brought up.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:42 am

cmu wrote:
JazzOne wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
JazzOne wrote:I'm going to have to go against the grain and say that Cornell is one of the better trolls on TLS.


seriously. this is turning into a good one. I thought we derailed this with the anteater in the denim jacket and the monstrous bong, but against all odds cornell has taken control of the thread again.

I mean, we could shut it down if we wanted to. lol
It's not that hard to get a thread locked.

Edit: Plus, I think this goes to prove that many TLSers respond to threads without reading what the hell is going on.


I agree, I think Cornell asked a legitimate question, that's why I gave him a serious response. And with all seriousness, I think some people on TLS are just too sensitive when they see a 179/4.0, and there's a tendency to dismiss people with such high numbers.


Image

4102011
Posts: 1724
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:00 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby 4102011 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:43 am

Mike12188 wrote:I don't think he'll ever be able to create a thread where eit isn't brought up.


+1

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby James Bond » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:46 am

dulcatis wrote:
Mike12188 wrote:I don't think he'll ever be able to create a thread where eit isn't brought up.


+1


+ --ImageRemoved--

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby James Bond » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:47 am

cmu wrote:I agree, I think Cornell asked a legitimate question, that's why I gave him a serious response. And with all seriousness, I think some people on TLS are just too sensitive when they see a 179/4.0, and there's a tendency to dismiss people with such high numbers.


You have 9 posts and yet you're already making sweeping and unfounded generalizations?

You'll fit in well here :mrgreen:

User avatar
cmu
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby cmu » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:50 am

James Bond wrote:
cmu wrote:I agree, I think Cornell asked a legitimate question, that's why I gave him a serious response. And with all seriousness, I think some people on TLS are just too sensitive when they see a 179/4.0, and there's a tendency to dismiss people with such high numbers.


You have 9 posts and yet you're already making sweeping and unfounded generalizations?

You'll fit in well here :mrgreen:


I've been browsing through TLS for like a year, yeah my account is new so what? at least I don't sound like a jerk like some people here.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:51 am

Mike12188 wrote:I don't think he'll ever be able to create a thread where eit isn't brought up.


haha, this is gold.

Image

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby James Bond » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:52 am

Ooooh I forgot I did that one :lol:

canuck
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:26 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby canuck » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:55 am

Cornell buddy. I will give you a serious response. Seems like everyone is ragging on you. Not cool.

It's hard to chance those numbers given the apparent randomness of Yale and Stanford. That said, I can definitely say that your chances of being a total douche are at least 85%, possibly with a solid merit scholarship from the academy of douchebaggery. Just make sure to continue with self-celebratory forum postings and you should be a perfect candidate.

Good luck pal!
Last edited by canuck on Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:56 am

James Bond wrote:Ooooh I forgot I did that one :lol:


haha, I just dug up that thread so I could read it. definitely wasn't a member in 2007.

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby James Bond » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:57 am

FuManChusco wrote:
James Bond wrote:Ooooh I forgot I did that one :lol:


haha, I just dug up that thread so I could read it. definitely wasn't a member in 2007.


:| Didn't that thread happen last month?

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: 179/4.0

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:59 am

James Bond wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
James Bond wrote:Ooooh I forgot I did that one :lol:


haha, I just dug up that thread so I could read it. definitely wasn't a member in 2007.


:| Didn't that thread happen last month?


haha, I'm an idiot. totally scanned the thread and noticed a join date of sep 2007 rather than the thread date. thread was actually this month. I must have missed it.

User avatar
JazzOne
Posts: 2938
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am

Re: 179/4.0

Postby JazzOne » Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:33 am

cmu wrote:
James Bond wrote:
cmu wrote:I agree, I think Cornell asked a legitimate question, that's why I gave him a serious response. And with all seriousness, I think some people on TLS are just too sensitive when they see a 179/4.0, and there's a tendency to dismiss people with such high numbers.


You have 9 posts and yet you're already making sweeping and unfounded generalizations?

You'll fit in well here :mrgreen:


I've been browsing through TLS for like a year, yeah my account is new so what? at least I don't sound like a jerk like some people here.

And a hyper aggressive sense of indignity. Going to fit in well indeed.




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest