3.6 170
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:12 pm
3.6 170
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=126482
Or, better yet, retake the LSAT.colemf wrote:USC and UCLA isn't going to happen, look at some lower tier1 and upper tier 2 schools.
I don't want to encourage thread hijacking, but if you can demonstrate that your performance on standardized tests is not a predictor of your work (like your eventual high GPA) you should mention that in an addendum and attach your (low) SAT score report. I'd say you have a good shot at #25-50 with the numbers you have. Otherwise, get your lsat up, girlll.shanshan333 wrote:Did you really get into Emory with those stats? Right now I have a 3.98 GPA and I'm taking the LSAT in October. So far I'm scoring low 160s on the practice test, I'm trying to get it up to at least 163. I've been wondering what schools would be realistic. I'm also concerned about my extracurricular, they're good just not great. I'm interested in BC, Emory, Brooklyn Law, Cardozo, Tulane, Villanova, Fordham, etc. I'm thinking of applying to St. John's and Loyola Marymount as safeties. Any recommendations- aside from general comments like 'get your lsat up, girlll" would be appreciated. I realize that I could get the score up as I have a little under two months to study. I just want to prepare myself and be realistic. I'm also graduating a year early so everything seems confusing and extremely rushed. Don't know if schools would look favorably on the fact that i did undergrad in 3 years. This is also why my extracurriculars are not phenomenal. I honestly just wasn't given the time. Sorry for rambling.
Unless you're underrepresented minority or something and write a compelling personal statement, you probably have to get the LSAT score up for USC/UCLA. Being first generation doesn't hurt, either, but I would put that into an addendum if there's a good story behind it.johnstonad wrote:How am I looking for schools on the west coast? Specifically USC and UCLA. Worked all 4 years undergrad and usual softs. First generation.
I was going to graduate early as well until I went to the LSAC Forum and every representative over there recommended I stay the 4 years to build up a resume and to have time to study for the LSAT. I had so many credits that I had to quadruple major with 2 bachelors and a certificate, but it did help me by giving me more time to get myself together. I was under the impression that showing them I can do in 3 years something that takes most people over 4 years would be beneficial, but nope, not the case. Just kill the LSAT and you're all set with that GPA. Take it in december if you feel you still have room for improvement and apply next year. That's probably what I'm gonna do, I'm not too confident with taking the LSAT in October.shanshan333 wrote:Did you really get into Emory with those stats? Right now I have a 3.98 GPA and I'm taking the LSAT in October. So far I'm scoring low 160s on the practice test, I'm trying to get it up to at least 163. I've been wondering what schools would be realistic. I'm also concerned about my extracurricular, they're good just not great. I'm interested in BC, Emory, Brooklyn Law, Cardozo, Tulane, Villanova, Fordham, etc. I'm thinking of applying to St. John's and Loyola Marymount as safeties. Any recommendations- aside from general comments like 'get your lsat up, girlll" would be appreciated. I realize that I could get the score up as I have a little under two months to study. I just want to prepare myself and be realistic. I'm also graduating a year early so everything seems confusing and extremely rushed. Don't know if schools would look favorably on the fact that i did undergrad in 3 years. This is also why my extracurriculars are not phenomenal. I honestly just wasn't given the time. Sorry for rambling.