.

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
User avatar
ArchRoark
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:53 pm

.

Postby ArchRoark » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:15 pm

.
Last edited by ArchRoark on Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jmhendri
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby jmhendri » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:17 pm

Do you suffer from low self esteem?

User avatar
ArchRoark
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby ArchRoark » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:20 pm

jmhendri wrote:Do you suffer from low self esteem?



not in the least -- : )

An on topic response would be helpful.

User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby rayiner » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:21 pm

Your targets should be MVPDNCG.

User avatar
jmhendri
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby jmhendri » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:22 pm

Tiva wrote:
jmhendri wrote:Do you suffer from low self esteem?



not in the least -- : )

An on topic response would be helpful.


Don't bother thinking outside T20.

User avatar
ArchRoark
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby ArchRoark » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:30 pm

rayiner wrote:Your targets should be MVPDNCG.

jmhendri wrote:Don't bother thinking outside T20.


Thanks. I appreciate the replies. For some reason I was under the impression that my GPA would put me out of contention for most of those schools.

Anyone have any thoughts on my addendum... should I include it? There is a fine-line between making excuses and giving context. I don't want to end up on the wrong side of that line.

User avatar
TommyK
Posts: 1309
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:08 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby TommyK » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:34 pm

Your gpa is rough, but fortunately law schools tend to weigh the value of the LSAT as much as 4x as heavily*

Congrats on rocking the LSAT.

*the specific weight varies from school to school, but since the LSAT is about the only normalized aspect of the application process, they tend to value it more than the GPA.

User avatar
bgdddymtty
Posts: 697
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:59 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby bgdddymtty » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:41 pm

Tiva wrote:
rayiner wrote:Your targets should be MVPDNCG.

jmhendri wrote:Don't bother thinking outside T20.


Thanks. I appreciate the replies. For some reason I was under the impression that my GPA would put me out of contention for most of those schools.

Anyone have any thoughts on my addendum... should I include it? There is a fine-line between making excuses and giving context. I don't want to end up on the wrong side of that line.

Absolutely include the addendum or, if it works appropriately, work it into your PS. You will receive T14 acceptances.

User avatar
pinkzeppelin
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby pinkzeppelin » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:51 pm

I would even throw an app at HYS, as a URM with a 177, you never know who might bite.

User avatar
jmhendri
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby jmhendri » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:52 pm

pinkzeppelin wrote:I would even throw an app at HYS, as a URM with a 177, you never know who might bite.


srsly.

User avatar
Na_Swatch
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby Na_Swatch » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:29 pm

I would say apply to Columbia and on down... 177 is an awesome score + URM status, but there have literally been like 1 or 2 acceptances by HYS with a GPA <2.9 in the past several years. I'd save my money there, and but take my chances in that one of CCN might bite.

User avatar
Thirteen
Posts: 23852
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby Thirteen » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:47 pm

jmhendri wrote:
pinkzeppelin wrote:I would even throw an app at HYS, as a URM with a 177, you never know who might bite.


srsly.

User avatar
mallard
Posts: 1092
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:45 am

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby mallard » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:47 pm

HYS won't take that GPA, but everywhere else is worth an application, and you'll be getting fee waivers.

User avatar
merichard87
Posts: 751
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:31 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby merichard87 » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:09 pm

Also, look heavily at Northwestern who loves your kind of splitter even without URM status.

User avatar
captainculpepper
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:58 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby captainculpepper » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:12 pm

merichard87 wrote:Also, look heavily at Northwestern who loves your kind of splitter even without URM status.

Plus he has WE

User avatar
ArchRoark
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby ArchRoark » Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:34 pm

I appreciate all the responses. About fee-waivers, I have been getting a few by email since taking the June LSAT but none from schools I would like to attend. When the upcoming admission cycle gets closer should I just call/email the schools I plan to app to and ask about possible fee-waivers?

User avatar
kalvano
Posts: 11720
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby kalvano » Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:42 pm

Tiva wrote:I appreciate all the responses. About fee-waivers, I have been getting a few by email since taking the June LSAT but none from schools I would like to attend. When the upcoming admission cycle gets closer should I just call/email the schools I plan to app to and ask about possible fee-waivers?



Yes. Email is best. You should have great success with it. Be brief and to the point.

"I'm applying to law school, I'd like to be considered for a fee waiver. I am interested in XYZ School of Law. I'd appreciate any financial assistance you can provide."

Tiva
LSAC#
LSAT
GPA

User avatar
iShotFirst
Posts: 460
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:13 am

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby iShotFirst » Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:44 pm

Yes definitely call or email. Schools give out those things like crazy if you just ask, and the worst that can happen is they say no! With that LSAT you should be able to get a ton of em, good luck!

User avatar
mbw
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:56 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby mbw » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:02 am

OP, my GPA was only .05 higher than yours, and I hit bank with three of the T14 with a much lower LSAT. However, that said, I know people who have numbers somewhere between ours who haven't seen such results. My recommendation is to target heavily the T14, but then apply to those schools 15-40 where you really would like to attend, particularly if well-funded. That way, you cover your bases.

Good luck.

User avatar
Dr. Strangelove
Posts: 557
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby Dr. Strangelove » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:58 pm

Being a URM is going to help you a lot, despite the low GPA.
I think you can get into any non T14 and have a shot at the lower T14 (except for HYSCCN, Berkeley, Penn).

User avatar
lennonist
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:38 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby lennonist » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:21 pm

Depends on your major, too.

I know an engineer with about the same GPA as you and a 175 who got into UCLA Law.

keg411
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby keg411 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:30 pm

Enjoy Northwestern :).

Norlan
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:45 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby Norlan » Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:39 pm

mbw wrote:OP, my GPA was only .05 higher than yours, and I hit bank with three of the T14 with a much lower LSAT. However, that said, I know people who have numbers somewhere between ours who haven't seen such results. My recommendation is to target heavily the T14, but then apply to those schools 15-40 where you really would like to attend, particularly if well-funded. That way, you cover your bases.

Good luck.


Are you a URM? According to lawschoolpredictor.com, I put in 2.82 gpa and 175(assumed) for lsat and you only get 3 "Consider"s and 4 "Weak Consider"s for T14. Being a URM certainly gives you some boost and results show better than the above, but I'm always unsure whether I should shoot for the mediocre "Consider"s (ones in yellow)

User avatar
mbw
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:56 pm

Re: 2.77 - 177

Postby mbw » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:11 pm

Norlan wrote:
mbw wrote:OP, my GPA was only .05 higher than yours, and I hit bank with three of the T14 with a much lower LSAT. However, that said, I know people who have numbers somewhere between ours who haven't seen such results. My recommendation is to target heavily the T14, but then apply to those schools 15-40 where you really would like to attend, particularly if well-funded. That way, you cover your bases.

Good luck.


Are you a URM? According to lawschoolpredictor.com, I put in 2.82 gpa and 175(assumed) for lsat and you only get 3 "Consider"s and 4 "Weak Consider"s for T14. Being a URM certainly gives you some boost and results show better than the above, but I'm always unsure whether I should shoot for the mediocre "Consider"s (ones in yellow)


Yes, I'm AI with strong cultural affiliation. I had a 165, but I also had some pretty strong other softs (PhD, published, work and political experience, etc.) If the OP can write a strong explanation for your GPA (sounds like the OP can -- I had a kid during UG, and I wrote about how that effected my grades,) and get good LoRs to testify to hard work and character, then I expect some T14s will take a chance on him. But make sure to add some "safeties" to the list. Just in case.

And lawschoolpredictor is just a program -- it can't actually take into consideration all the factors that go into URM admissions. I wouldn't bother using it. I think it predicted I wouldn't make it higher than a T40.




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ajw431, NorCalOldGuy, zoetroposcope and 2 guests