Do you mean current students or admitted students? Admitted student numbers are what we are concerned about.ConMan345 wrote:There was a good number--I think they're the largest minority group at SLS, if I'm not mistaken.Illijah wrote:How many AA's did you guys see>
Stanford ASW 2010 Forum
- hiromoto45
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
Well, official figures put Asian-Americans as the most numerous at 13%. As for AA, I'd say 10%ishhiromoto45 wrote:Do you mean current students or admitted students? Admitted student numbers are what we are concerned about.ConMan345 wrote:There was a good number--I think they're the largest minority group at SLS, if I'm not mistaken.Illijah wrote:How many AA's did you guys see>
-
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:42 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
yes I'm concerned with the number of admitted AA's, not current. Last year there was only 17 (10%) so i'm not sure what a "good number" is this year.hiromoto45 wrote:Do you mean current students or admitted students? Admitted student numbers are what we are concerned about.ConMan345 wrote:There was a good number--I think they're the largest minority group at SLS, if I'm not mistaken.Illijah wrote:How many AA's did you guys see>
- hiromoto45
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
We meant African American not Asian American.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:37 am
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
If you're interested in a version of Kramer's remarks, check out the short piece he wrote for the fall issue of SLS's alumni magazine, available here: http://stanfordlawyer.law.stanford.edu/ ... he-dean-2/BioEBear2010 wrote:Yes, please shareamputatedbrain wrote:No, when was this?!?! And what did he say? Feel free to PM me if you wantBioEBear2010 wrote:
The ASW was awesome! I had to leave early because I was (and still am) feeling pretty under the weather, but I had a wonderful time meeting the faculty and my fellow admits. My Cousin Vinny and bowling + beer were especially fun
I was pretty impressed with the ASW too. Where you there when Dean Kramer gave his epic answer to the kid who asked if he planned on gaming the rankings to try to get to #1?
Dean Kramer is hilarious, by the way.
These remarks, which contrasted starkly with the reactions of other law school deans to the current legal economy, was one of the things that first really impressed me about SLS. His presence at ASW (along with a lot of other cool things) have just about convinced me that it'd be the best place for me to go to school -- and it sounds like I'm not the only one.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
Don't forget two things about the question to Dean Kramer on whether Stanford aspired to be #1 in USNEWS:
1) This was the very first question asked during the Q&A.
2) Dean Kramer said that deciding where to go based on rankings a shitty way to decide. (Yes, he said shit to a room full of admits. It was a riot.)
1) This was the very first question asked during the Q&A.
2) Dean Kramer said that deciding where to go based on rankings a shitty way to decide. (Yes, he said shit to a room full of admits. It was a riot.)
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
I didn't go to the Q&A, but that is embarrassing.WhiskeyGuy wrote:Don't forget two things about the question to Dean Kramer on whether Stanford aspired to be #1 in USNEWS:
1) This was the very first question asked during the Q&A.
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
The admit who asked it seemed quite pleased with himself.crackberry wrote:I didn't go to the Q&A, but that is embarrassing.WhiskeyGuy wrote:Don't forget two things about the question to Dean Kramer on whether Stanford aspired to be #1 in USNEWS:
1) This was the very first question asked during the Q&A.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
For all our sakes I hope he doesn't come to Stanford.WhiskeyGuy wrote:The admit who asked it seemed quite pleased with himself.crackberry wrote:I didn't go to the Q&A, but that is embarrassing.WhiskeyGuy wrote:Don't forget two things about the question to Dean Kramer on whether Stanford aspired to be #1 in USNEWS:
1) This was the very first question asked during the Q&A.
- ndnlawdc
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
A popular prof dropped the f-bomb during the first day of orientation to all the 1Ls. Hey, it's Stanford.WhiskeyGuy wrote: 2) Dean Kramer said that deciding where to go based on rankings a shitty way to decide. (Yes, he said shit to a room full of admits. It was a riot.)
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
Hmm...I have my guesses. Perhaps a rumored SCOTUS short list member?ndnlawdc wrote:A popular prof dropped the f-bomb during the first day of orientation to all the 1Ls. Hey, it's Stanford.WhiskeyGuy wrote: 2) Dean Kramer said that deciding where to go based on rankings a shitty way to decide. (Yes, he said shit to a room full of admits. It was a riot.)
- ndnlawdc
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
Nope. The prof is less insanely accomplished and well-known than just popular among the students.WhiskeyGuy wrote: Hmm...I have my guesses. Perhaps a rumored SCOTUS short list member?
- Billy Blanks
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
Would it have been a long-haired, earring-wearing male?ndnlawdc wrote:Nope. The prof is less insanely accomplished and well-known than just popular among the students.WhiskeyGuy wrote: Hmm...I have my guesses. Perhaps a rumored SCOTUS short list member?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ndnlawdc
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford ASW 2010
Nah, but I would expect it from that guy as well.Billy Blanks wrote:Would it have been a long-haired, earring-wearing male?ndnlawdc wrote:Nope. The prof is less insanely accomplished and well-known than just popular among the students.WhiskeyGuy wrote: Hmm...I have my guesses. Perhaps a rumored SCOTUS short list member?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login