Re: "Fratty" Law Schools
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:04 pm
We could argue about tiers all day long, but it's a waste of time.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=102487
LSU has moved into Tier I, and it is dumping a ton of money into keep thattarheel87 wrote:Stupid as this is I am throwing in my two cents on big schools (best as I can tell). This is pretty general, take it as you will. I left out anything not worth really mentioning:jeeptiger09 wrote:This is pretty accurate, I'd probably take SC out of Tier I for Tier II. I don't know about LSU being Tier 2, lots of corndog loving wierdos, although Baton Rouge is a pretty decent city. I'd take UF out of Tier III too (Jort capital of the world), maybe throw in Kentucky and Charleston into Tier 3.deadpanic wrote:I was a greek at Ole Miss and would like to throw in my biased, but knowledgeable opinion.
In no particular order within the tiers:
Tier I
Ole Miss
USC (South Carolina, that is)
UGA
Bama
Tier II
LSU
UT (Tennessee)
UNC
Samford
Mercer
Loyola-New Orleans
W&L
Tier III
FSU
Tulane
Wake
UVA
SMU
Arkansas
UF
Texas
Memphis
Campbell
Agreed about Wofford. Furman is frat too.
And whoever brought up frat vs. bro, what the hell are you talking about?
Tier I: Ole Miss, Bama, UGA, LSU (not really sure)
Tier II: Auburn, South Carolina, Clemson, Texas
Tier III: UNC, Tennesee, UVA, W&L, Wofford
Tier IV: SMU, Vanderbilt, Wake Forest, Florida, Arkansas, Oklahoma, FSU
LSU is dumping a bunch of money to be fratty?JessicaTiger wrote: LSU has moved into Tier I, and it is dumping a ton of money into keep that
No, to be a Tier One schoolStringer Bell wrote:LSU is dumping a bunch of money to be fratty?JessicaTiger wrote: LSU has moved into Tier I, and it is dumping a ton of money into keep that
tarheel87 wrote:Stupid as this is I am throwing in my two cents on big schools (best as I can tell). This is pretty general, take it as you will. I left out anything not worth really mentioning:jeeptiger09 wrote:This is pretty accurate, I'd probably take SC out of Tier I for Tier II. I don't know about LSU being Tier 2, lots of corndog loving wierdos, although Baton Rouge is a pretty decent city. I'd take UF out of Tier III too (Jort capital of the world), maybe throw in Kentucky and Charleston into Tier 3.deadpanic wrote:I was a greek at Ole Miss and would like to throw in my biased, but knowledgeable opinion.
In no particular order within the tiers:
Tier I
Ole Miss
USC (South Carolina, that is)
UGA
Bama
Tier II
LSU
UT (Tennessee)
UNC
Samford
Mercer
Loyola-New Orleans
W&L
Tier III
FSU
Tulane
Wake
UVA
SMU
Arkansas
UF
Texas
Memphis
Campbell
Agreed about Wofford. Furman is frat too.
And whoever brought up frat vs. bro, what the hell are you talking about?
Tier I: Ole Miss, Bama, UGA, LSU (not really sure)
Tier II: Auburn, South Carolina, Texas
Tier III: UNC, Tennesee, UVA, W&L, Vanderbilt
Tier IV: SMU, Wake Forest, Florida, Arkansas, Oklahoma, FSU
EDIT: To remove Clemson and Wofford since they don't have law schools
lol...you're at a 10 when you need to be at a 2.flcath wrote:Fratty people are such douchebags; they are visually repelling.
I'm sorry, I don't think you understand it. Ask ANY other SEC school, Florida is the anti-frat. And South Florida money is exactly why.Lonagan wrote:UF fits the bill. Greeks all over place, and while the school and town are more liberal than conservative, there is tons of south Florida money running around there.
South Florida is not frat. South Florida is probably the least fratty location outside of NY/NJ.Lonagan wrote:there is tons of south Florida money running around there.
utexas2010 wrote:UT-Austin is your place without a doubt. I can't buy a cup of coffee without running into 10 of these guys. You forgot to mention hologram sunglasses with a strap connected to it, fishing shirts, nice comb-overs and for some reason Styrofoam cups are big this year. If that is your crowd then you will love UT...but personally I am ready to get away from these types of people, they dress like my 50 year old dad haha but to each his own.
jeeptiger09 wrote:You mean carry? I don't know about Vera Bradley or whatnot because I'm a guy, but I thought it was just handbags and purses, etc. I guess I may be in the dark on this stuff, but most girls on my campus are sporting these bags or sorority/Vineyard Vines bags.
clsballer1 wrote:There are differences between fratty and bro
1. Don't have to be in a frat to be a bro. Being in a frat does not make you a bro. An unusually high percentage of bros are in frats due to the fact that the frat lifestyle is conducive to bro'ing.
2. Being a bro is not about what you wear. Most bro's naturally wear brolo due to its stylishness and comfort. Wannabees equate clothing with brohood because it the only way they can pretend to be bro's.
3. Bro's usually don't really give f*ck about anything. However, they are generally smart and can get good grades, plagued by the itis, prone to crushing brews, slaying sorority chicks(whether in a frat or not), possessing a general unexplained swagger.
4. Fratstars are bro's
edit. fratstars go on month long benders, drink, smoke, and bang more girls than the everyone. Yet they seem content doing these things without advertising them to the world via douchey clothing etc.
It's not a requirement to live in the south, promise Speaking from nearly 23 years of experience... Most girls just use them as luggage. It's kind of um "dorky" to carry as a purse, for lack of a better word.Trifles wrote:jeeptiger09 wrote:You mean carry? I don't know about Vera Bradley or whatnot because I'm a guy, but I thought it was just handbags and purses, etc. I guess I may be in the dark on this stuff, but most girls on my campus are sporting these bags or sorority/Vineyard Vines bags.
I'm a northern girl, and I had to google Vera Bradley. I am sooo not cut out for a southern school, those bags are effin hideous.