GULC 2010 WL'ers

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
gobears09
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby gobears09 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:16 pm

beef wellington wrote:
gobears09 wrote:
beef wellington wrote::shock: just went UR 3/31

171 3.2

Check yr status!


ME TOO!! AGH!

....Do you think were getting in? What does this mean?! I might have a heart attack.

I like our chances. Did you apply FT/PT?


Just FT. Im afraid to speculate.

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby tommytahoe » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:02 pm

Are y'all SPWLers? I am a PWL, and my status hasn't changed. I imagine you are all the March 22nd folks.

User avatar
Holly Golightly
Posts: 4618
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby Holly Golightly » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:13 pm

SPWL, no update. If I don't get in in the next round, I'm depositing at NU...

gobears09
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby gobears09 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:46 pm

tommytahoe wrote:Are y'all SPWLers? I am a PWL, and my status hasn't changed. I imagine you are all the March 22nd folks.


Yes I am SPWL, and I was DR 3/22 originally

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby r6_philly » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:54 pm

gobears09 wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:Are y'all SPWLers? I am a PWL, and my status hasn't changed. I imagine you are all the March 22nd folks.


Yes I am SPWL, and I was DR 3/22 originally


Did you send a LOCI? That was after a bunch of 3/19's. You must be getting in.

gobears09
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby gobears09 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:30 pm

r6_philly wrote:
gobears09 wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:Are y'all SPWLers? I am a PWL, and my status hasn't changed. I imagine you are all the March 22nd folks.


Yes I am SPWL, and I was DR 3/22 originally


Did you send a LOCI? That was after a bunch of 3/19's. You must be getting in.



Dont get me too excited now... but I just read back several pages through the thread and am feeling incredibly optimistic for BeefWellington and myself.

I sent an LOCI on 3/25 and received a same day response.

GoNU
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:14 am

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby GoNU » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:43 pm

gobears09 wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
gobears09 wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:Are y'all SPWLers? I am a PWL, and my status hasn't changed. I imagine you are all the March 22nd folks.


Yes I am SPWL, and I was DR 3/22 originally


Did you send a LOCI? That was after a bunch of 3/19's. You must be getting in.



Dont get me too excited now... but I just read back several pages through the thread and am feeling incredibly optimistic for BeefWellington and myself.

I sent an LOCI on 3/25 and received a same day response.

So your spwl letter said mid april like mine and they just gave u another decision?

dk8
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:39 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby dk8 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:44 pm

congrats dudes. i'm jealous as hell. hopefully there will be more of this as people start withdrawing.

User avatar
Xizenta
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:53 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby Xizenta » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:45 pm

gobears09 wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
gobears09 wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:Are y'all SPWLers? I am a PWL, and my status hasn't changed. I imagine you are all the March 22nd folks.


Yes I am SPWL, and I was DR 3/22 originally


Did you send a LOCI? That was after a bunch of 3/19's. You must be getting in.



Dont get me too excited now... but I just read back several pages through the thread and am feeling incredibly optimistic for BeefWellington and myself.

I sent an LOCI on 3/25 and received a same day response.


How was their response? also, you sent it by e-mail or what?

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby r6_philly » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:51 pm

Congrats! I didn't write a LOCI and it makes sense you guys are going UR before me and other 3/19. I am waiting for aid info from Michigan but I don't think I can get anything from gtown anyway. So there will probably be 1 less competitor off the SPWL. They will probably just defer me to regular PWL anyway without a LOCI.

gobears09
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: GULC 2010 WL'ers

Postby gobears09 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:52 pm

Xizenta wrote: How was their response? also, you sent it by e-mail or what?

Emailed to my direct contact, their response said basically "Thanks for you email and continued interest and updates to your app, for now theres nothing else you need to do, contact me if you need too."

GoNU wrote:So your spwl letter said mid april like mine and they just gave u another decision?

My original SPWL email said I would be updated no later than mid April, and I dont have another decision, just went back UR 3/31.

dk8 wrote:congrats dudes. i'm jealous as hell. hopefully there will be more of this as people start withdrawing.

Thank you :) It seems like this has been happening for some time going back several pages through the thread, however, it hasnt actually happened to me yet!

purell2
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 2:23 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby purell2 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:46 am

why did the subject of this thread change?...

MissLucky
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby MissLucky » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:48 am

hey, for additionally letters of rec - how should the recommender send them? to LSAC just like with the original letters of rec or does GT have a specific protocal for after the wait list? thanks!

memaha
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 am

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby memaha » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:51 am

purell2 wrote:why did the subject of this thread change?...


check your calendar :)

purell2
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 2:23 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby purell2 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:45 am

haha :) ah.... i see

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby tommytahoe » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:03 am

MissLucky wrote:hey, for additionally letters of rec - how should the recommender send them? to LSAC just like with the original letters of rec or does GT have a specific protocol for after the wait list? thanks!


I want to know the answer to this as well. It's important to note that GULC has a max of 4 LORs on the LSAC website, so any of you eager enough to send them 4 in your application may need a way around this. That particular snafu may happen to me with another school down the road, so I'm curious how one would get around that.

Also, if I'm sending them a supplementary LOR as well as an updated transcript and resume, how do I ensure that LSAC knows to send them all as a new packet of info.?

EDIT: OK, that was some clever web editing, folks. I type GULC, out comes The Caboose of the T13 on the other side... as evidenced by this edit as well. :)

MissLucky
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby MissLucky » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:09 am

tommytahoe wrote:
MissLucky wrote:hey, for additionally letters of rec - how should the recommender send them? to LSAC just like with the original letters of rec or does GT have a specific protocol for after the wait list? thanks!


I want to know the answer to this as well. It's important to note that The Caboose of the T13 has a max of 4 LORs on the LSAC website, so any of you eager enough to send them 4 in your application may need a way around this. That particular snafu may happen to me with another school down the road, so I'm curious how one would get around that.

Also, if I'm sending them a supplementary LOR as well as an updated transcript and resume, how do I ensure that LSAC knows to send them all as a new packet of info.?

EDIT: OK, that was some clever web editing, folks. I type The Caboose of the T13, out comes The Caboose of the T13 on the other side... as evidenced by this edit as well. :)


hey I called and I did send in 4 through LSAC - i'm just having my recommender send it directly to the admissions office

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby tommytahoe » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:16 am

MissLucky wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:
MissLucky wrote:hey, for additionally letters of rec - how should the recommender send them? to LSAC just like with the original letters of rec or does GT have a specific protocol for after the wait list? thanks!


I want to know the answer to this as well. It's important to note that The Caboose of the T13 has a max of 4 LORs on the LSAC website, so any of you eager enough to send them 4 in your application may need a way around this. That particular snafu may happen to me with another school down the road, so I'm curious how one would get around that.

Also, if I'm sending them a supplementary LOR as well as an updated transcript and resume, how do I ensure that LSAC knows to send them all as a new packet of info.?

EDIT: OK, that was some clever web editing, folks. I type The Caboose of the T13, out comes The Caboose of the T13 on the other side... as evidenced by this edit as well. :)


hey I called and I did send in 4 through LSAC - i'm just having my recommender send it directly to the admissions office


You called "said law school?" Or you called LSAC?

MissLucky
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby MissLucky » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:16 am

tommytahoe wrote:
MissLucky wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:
MissLucky wrote:hey, for additionally letters of rec - how should the recommender send them? to LSAC just like with the original letters of rec or does GT have a specific protocol for after the wait list? thanks!


I want to know the answer to this as well. It's important to note that The Caboose of the T13 has a max of 4 LORs on the LSAC website, so any of you eager enough to send them 4 in your application may need a way around this. That particular snafu may happen to me with another school down the road, so I'm curious how one would get around that.

Also, if I'm sending them a supplementary LOR as well as an updated transcript and resume, how do I ensure that LSAC knows to send them all as a new packet of info.?

EDIT: OK, that was some clever web editing, folks. I type The Caboose of the T13, out comes The Caboose of the T13 on the other side... as evidenced by this edit as well. :)


hey I called and I did send in 4 through LSAC - i'm just having my recommender send it directly to the admissions office


You called "said lawl skool?" Or you called LSAC?


called GT

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby tommytahoe » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:34 am

MissLucky wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:
MissLucky wrote:
tommytahoe wrote:I want to know the answer to this as well. It's important to note that The Caboose of the T13 has a max of 4 LORs on the LSAC website, so any of you eager enough to send them 4 in your application may need a way around this. That particular snafu may happen to me with another school down the road, so I'm curious how one would get around that.

Also, if I'm sending them a supplementary LOR as well as an updated transcript and resume, how do I ensure that LSAC knows to send them all as a new packet of info.?

EDIT: OK, that was some clever web editing, folks. I type The Caboose of the T13, out comes The Caboose of the T13 on the other side... as evidenced by this edit as well. :)


hey I called and I did send in 4 through LSAC - i'm just having my recommender send it directly to the admissions office


You called "said lawl skool?" Or you called LSAC?


called GT


Wow, I stumbled into more April Fools.

newyorklaw23
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:52 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby newyorklaw23 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:36 am

Good to see some other PWLers, so does it seem like we'll really be waiting until May for any sort of movement?

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby tommytahoe » Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:31 pm

newyorklaw23 wrote:Good to see some other PWLers, so does it seem like we'll really be waiting until May for any sort of movement?

Yeah, I suspect that for most PWLers, any news before May is probably bad news.

dk8
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:39 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby dk8 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:34 pm

newyorklaw23 wrote:Good to see some other PWLers, so does it seem like we'll really be waiting until May for any sort of movement?


after that imo. still alot of people on the SPWL and who knows if all of us will get off. I think a good percentage will.


tommytahoe wrote:
newyorklaw23 wrote:Good to see some other PWLers, so does it seem like we'll really be waiting until May for any sort of movement?

Yeah, I suspect that for most PWLers, any news before May is probably bad news.


There's no way they'll reject you any of you before May. There's just no reason to. Most schools don't start cutting their waitlists until around August if at all.

User avatar
daagermy1
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:00 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby daagermy1 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:11 pm

On LSN, seeing a solid trend over the last week of what seems to be acceptance and WL withdraws. Hopefully good news for us all going into April!

gobears09
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: The Caboose of the T13 2010 WL'ers

Postby gobears09 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 4:52 pm

DR 3/22 (SPWL) --> UR 3/31 --> DR 4/1 :shock:

I hope this isnt an april fools joke.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”