Re: Pitt 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:12 pm
jack, are you going to pitt?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=96420
In other words, we're rejected?burvowski wrote:I have a feeling a lot of people who are waiting to hear back from Pitt will start doing so once the April 1st deposit deadline passes.
This is the same for me. Well, except that I actually got through but they said I'm still under review. Crazy though, because I should have been a shoe in.smartin wrote:I applied in early January and went complete not long after. I got an email in early February saying that my application was under review and I haven't heard a peep since thing. I've tried calling a few times this week to check on the status and it just rings and rings and rings until voice mail kicks in. I left one voice mail and haven't heard back. Anyone else experience this?
I'm at the 75th% LSAT and above the 25% GPA by more than a tenth of a point.
I've tried (412) 648-1413 and (412) 648-1805
no no no no, i didn't mean it like that and i'm sorry if that's how it came across. I don't really know how the whole admissions things work but I just assumed that they would wait and see from the folks currently admitted to see who paid their deposits and how much room they had and then send out more acceptances.b.j. wrote:In other words, we're rejected?burvowski wrote:I have a feeling a lot of people who are waiting to hear back from Pitt will start doing so once the April 1st deposit deadline passes.
Oh, okay. (Even if you meant it like that, it's not the end of the world. I imagine that, as an eventual lawyer, people will be saying much worse things to me.)burvowski wrote:no no no no, i didn't mean it like that and i'm sorry if that's how it came across. I don't really know how the whole admissions things work but I just assumed that they would wait and see from the folks currently admitted to see who paid their deposits and how much room they had and then send out more acceptances.b.j. wrote:In other words, we're rejected?burvowski wrote:I have a feeling a lot of people who are waiting to hear back from Pitt will start doing so once the April 1st deposit deadline passes.
Always good to hear...jack duluoz wrote:Thanks to Spaceman Spiff in another thread...pretty good shout out.
Spaceman Spiff wrote:I was reading a blog and came across this article written by the chairman and global managing partner of K&L Gates. The article is a long complaint regarding the USNWR rankings. However, there is substantial discussion of Pitt Law (and schools like it).
From the article:
"I am a graduate of Yale Law School. It was and is a great place -- but it's no Pitt Law. Yale Law is the same tiny size it was 50 years ago -- about 165 students per class. The 50 largest law firms in the country now employ about 65,000 lawyers. Yale Law today, sad to say, is quantitatively beside the point to most of the country's leading law firms. And, of course, 'Yale Law' is merely a metaphor that embraces Harvard, Stanford, Chicago and the other "designer" law schools whose entering class sizes are frozen in time like the fetching smile of a prom date you haven't seen in 40 years.
"Consider the impact of the real Pitt Law on my firm. We have 29 partners and 60 lawyers overall who are graduates of Pitt Law. It has supplied us with a global development partner, a global general counsel, a global head of litigation and the managing partner of one of our largest offices. It trains great leaders as well as great lawyers not only because ideas matter there, but also because emotional intelligence and analytical intelligence go hand in hand. It doesn't sit well with me when Pitt Law is unfairly maligned."
The rest of the article is interesting as well. I particularly like this quote:
"If you are a beleaguered law school dean, know that this customer pays not a damn bit of attention to the U.S. News ranking -- nor should your applicant pool. "
Reminding us all that the only numbers that matter are employment stats.
http://www.law.com/jsp/law/careercenter ... s=newswire
What exactly would I say that wouldn't be asking for a decision over e-mail? I already received an e-mail three weeks ago telling me was I was under review. And then when sent another one asking whether I would be notified when a decision has been made, I was told all decisions would mailed to me, which come to think of it really doesn't answer my question.Compaq1984 wrote:To B.J. and "Snowpeach"....
For an update on your status, try sending an e-mail to Charmaine McCall or someone else in the admissions department. I have always had quick responses (<24hrs) whenever I had questions... GL!
I usually just made up an excuse to bother them...whether it was a random question about a LOR or just something about my application. Then I would nonchalantly ask how long it may be until I will get a decision... Something along those lines.... Worth a shot to calm your nerves...b.j. wrote:What exactly would I say that wouldn't be asking for a decision over e-mail? I already received an e-mail three weeks ago telling me was I was under review. And then when sent another one asking whether I would be notified when a decision has been made, I was told all decisions would mailed to me, which come to think of it really doesn't answer my question.Compaq1984 wrote:To B.J. and "Snowpeach"....
For an update on your status, try sending an e-mail to Charmaine McCall or someone else in the admissions department. I have always had quick responses (<24hrs) whenever I had questions... GL!
b.j. wrote:What exactly would I say that wouldn't be asking for a decision over e-mail? I already received an e-mail three weeks ago telling me was I was under review. And then when sent another one asking whether I would be notified when a decision has been made, I was told all decisions would mailed to me, which come to think of it really doesn't answer my question.Compaq1984 wrote:To B.J. and "Snowpeach"....
For an update on your status, try sending an e-mail to Charmaine McCall or someone else in the admissions department. I have always had quick responses (<24hrs) whenever I had questions... GL!
This.Scurredsitless1 wrote:b.j. wrote:What exactly would I say that wouldn't be asking for a decision over e-mail? I already received an e-mail three weeks ago telling me was I was under review. And then when sent another one asking whether I would be notified when a decision has been made, I was told all decisions would mailed to me, which come to think of it really doesn't answer my question.Compaq1984 wrote:To B.J. and "Snowpeach"....
For an update on your status, try sending an e-mail to Charmaine McCall or someone else in the admissions department. I have always had quick responses (<24hrs) whenever I had questions... GL!
I would ask if a decision has been made. As deposit deadlines approach, you would like to know if you should plan on submitting a deposit elsewhere.
It's an administrative question, I wouldn't worry about it changing an admission decision. Lawyers have to ask a lot of hard questions to people they don't know, and may be intimidated by. Think of this as practice.
Good Luck!
That makes sense.Scurredsitless1 wrote:b.j. wrote:What exactly would I say that wouldn't be asking for a decision over e-mail? I already received an e-mail three weeks ago telling me was I was under review. And then when sent another one asking whether I would be notified when a decision has been made, I was told all decisions would mailed to me, which come to think of it really doesn't answer my question.Compaq1984 wrote:To B.J. and "Snowpeach"....
For an update on your status, try sending an e-mail to Charmaine McCall or someone else in the admissions department. I have always had quick responses (<24hrs) whenever I had questions... GL!
I would ask if a decision has been made. As deposit deadlines approach, you would like to know if you should plan on submitting a deposit elsewhere.
It's an administrative question, I wouldn't worry about it changing an admission decision. Lawyers have to ask a lot of hard questions to people they don't know, and may be intimidated by. Think of this as practice.
Good Luck!
Nice! Congrats.keg411 wrote:Pitt is extremely random. I didn't even get an "in review" e-mail and came home one day to an acceptance letter. So if you have heard nothing, don't worry much!
I can spare you the suspense on Question #7...nooyyllib wrote:with my visit set next weekend i have a few questions about Pitt law
1. How competitive are students?
2. How are the professors? Are they easily accessible outside of class? Are they "evil"?
3. Do they tend to throw curveballs on the exams?
4. How is the curve?
5. Any specifics on job prospects for firms like KL Gates, Reed Smith, Jones Day ?(Please spare me the ITE talk)
6. I saw some university owned housing in North oakland, are those furnished? How "nice" are they? Are they easy to get? Is it first come first serve?
7. How is the weather there?
8. Any asian students?
9. If you are a 1L at Pitt and if you don't mind me asking, how well did you do? How much did you study?
Thanks.
I got a response. They just told me I was still under review. For over a month.Compaq1984 wrote:To B.J. and "Snowpeach"....
For an update on your status, try sending an e-mail to Charmaine McCall or someone else in the admissions department. I have always had quick responses (<24hrs) whenever I had questions... GL!
snowpeach06 wrote:I got a response. They just told me I was still under review. For over a month.Compaq1984 wrote:To B.J. and "Snowpeach"....
For an update on your status, try sending an e-mail to Charmaine McCall or someone else in the admissions department. I have always had quick responses (<24hrs) whenever I had questions... GL!
This was back a few months ago, but thanks . I'm kind of disappointed that I have to skip out early on ASD because I have to see Rutgers-Camden the next day and trek across and back the state of PA . Still, I'm looking forward to the visit next weekend.FunkyJD wrote:Nice! Congrats.keg411 wrote:Pitt is extremely random. I didn't even get an "in review" e-mail and came home one day to an acceptance letter. So if you have heard nothing, don't worry much!
Alot of this has been discussed in this thread. Go back a few pages.nooyyllib wrote:with my visit set next weekend i have a few questions about Pitt law
1. How competitive are students?
2. How are the professors? Are they easily accessible outside of class? Are they "evil"?
3. Do they tend to throw curveballs on the exams?
4. How is the curve?
5. Any specifics on job prospects for firms like KL Gates, Reed Smith, Jones Day ?(Please spare me the ITE talk)
6. I saw some university owned housing in North oakland, are those furnished? How "nice" are they? Are they easy to get? Is it first come first serve?
7. How is the weather there?
8. Any asian students?
9. If you are a 1L at Pitt and if you don't mind me asking, how well did you do? How much did you study?
Thanks.