Nope.noxhil wrote:I have a question for people who are WL'd/Held
Do the 3/22 and your WL/Hold email show up under the mailings section of status checker?
For WUSTL Applicants Forum
- ticklememauve
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:12 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
- kswiss
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:58 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
It probably doesn't matter either way for me, since my GPA is on the low side, though my LSAT is on the high side for WUSTL. I guess with a GPA<25% and an LSAT>75%, it comes down to softs anyway, so all someone really needs is a 168 to not affect 75%. I'm thinking because high LSATs are getting less rare, some schools might make a run at their LSAT #s this cycle. Here's to hoping I guess. Sent a LOCI, we'll see if it makes any difference whatsover. I told them straight up that they'd get my deposit the day I am accepted if accepted, but with tons of other candidates with better numbers than me I doubt it will make a difference.JCougar wrote:kswiss, I do think your opinions are sound, even though I am in the same boat as you bias-wise. The fact that people are applying to more schools this year means there physically has to be a lower yield rate this year, unless all extra applications were expended on reach schools where no one got in. I seriously doubt that is the case.
The one mitigating factor is that higher LSAT scores are becoming increasingly less rare due to more people retaking the test. Also, the percentile curve of the actual LSAT seems to be shifting a bit and more of the bell curve seems to be hitting the higher scores. This increase is very small every year, but coupled with the extra retakes fueled by the new policy of most schools taking your highest score, more applicants will have a 167+ to report each year, even if they scored in the 70th percentile the first two times they took the test. Also, there's the simple increase in applicants period, which is up 4% this year. So eventually, these splitter-friendly schools will either be upping their medians or have the opportunity to be more selective with splitters in the future. Perhaps that future is now.
- najumobi
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
only school's medians matter. and wustl is one of the easiest places to predict acceptance or rejection based on applicants' numbers. according to lsn of 145 applicants with lsat score of at least a 167 and a gpa below median (3.7) who have received an decision of accepted, rejected, or waitlisted, 134 were accepted, 1 was rejected, and 10 were waitlisted.kswiss wrote:It probably doesn't matter either way for me, since my GPA is on the low side, though my LSAT is on the high side for WUSTL. I guess with a GPA<25% and an LSAT>75%, it comes down to softs anyway, so all someone really needs is a 168 to not affect 75%. I'm thinking because high LSATs are getting less rare, some schools might make a run at their LSAT #s this cycle. Here's to hoping I guess. Sent a LOCI, we'll see if it makes any difference whatsover. I told them straight up that they'd get my deposit the day I am accepted if accepted, but with tons of other candidates with better numbers than me I doubt it will make a difference.
wustl seems to pluck off just high lsat, low gpa splitters off their waitlist so you're not in a bad position.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:11 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
You mean the personalized stationery my mom sent with me to sleep-away camp?fl0w wrote:print it on official letterheard.MissLucky wrote:do they prefer LOCIs via snail mail or email?kswiss wrote:Has anyone sent a LOCI via email? Know who to send it to? I don't want to just send it to the blanket admissions email, but if thats the correct one, then so be it.
This is my last hope in the T20, I'm going to write the LOCI of a lifetime. I've got my rhetorical wrangling shirt on. And theres a good shot that none of it will matter.
sign it with a pen.
scan it.
PDF it.
email it.
- kswiss
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:58 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Dude you got a killer scholly. Congrats.najumobi wrote:only school's medians matter. and wustl is one of the easiest places to predict acceptance or rejection based on applicants' numbers. according to lsn of 145 applicants with lsat score of at least a 167 and a gpa below median (3.7) who have received an decision of accepted, rejected, or waitlisted, 134 were accepted, 1 was rejected, and 10 were waitlisted.kswiss wrote:It probably doesn't matter either way for me, since my GPA is on the low side, though my LSAT is on the high side for WUSTL. I guess with a GPA<25% and an LSAT>75%, it comes down to softs anyway, so all someone really needs is a 168 to not affect 75%. I'm thinking because high LSATs are getting less rare, some schools might make a run at their LSAT #s this cycle. Here's to hoping I guess. Sent a LOCI, we'll see if it makes any difference whatsover. I told them straight up that they'd get my deposit the day I am accepted if accepted, but with tons of other candidates with better numbers than me I doubt it will make a difference.
wustl seems to pluck off just high lsat, low gpa splitters off their waitlist so you're not in a bad position.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- najumobi
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
thankskswiss wrote:Dude you got a killer scholly. Congrats.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Boy, this thread is quiet today.
Right now, WUSTL is quietly calculating our fates now that their first seat deposit data is final. They're seeing if they need to fortify their medians any more, or if they have the leeway to pivot and focus more on filling the class based on other factors, whatever they may be (work experience, writing ability, 25th %iles, more diversity, yield rate, etc.).
Right now, WUSTL is quietly calculating our fates now that their first seat deposit data is final. They're seeing if they need to fortify their medians any more, or if they have the leeway to pivot and focus more on filling the class based on other factors, whatever they may be (work experience, writing ability, 25th %iles, more diversity, yield rate, etc.).
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
i like to think of it as only 2 categories. numbers vs. softs. if they need the numbers they'll pull from the held list. if they don't need the numbers then they'll go for softs (which i consider diversity, work experience, cowboys, etc). with the latter having the chance of accepting people with both numbers below medians and non-urm.JCougar wrote:Boy, this thread is quiet today.
Right now, WUSTL is quietly calculating our fates now that their first seat deposit data is final. They're seeing if they need to fortify their medians any more, or if they have the leeway to pivot and focus more on filling the class based on other factors, whatever they may be (work experience, writing ability, 25th %iles, more diversity, yield rate, etc.).
-
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
County Crows' Omaha just told me not to go to WashU.
- chicoalto0649
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:34 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
sibley wrote:County Crows' Omaha just told me not to go to WashU.
Who/what?
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
you haven't heard from count crows' omaha? that's a bad sign man...chicoalto0649 wrote:sibley wrote:County Crows' Omaha just told me not to go to WashU.
Who/what?
- NU_Jet55
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I'm opposed to...I mean +1chicoalto0649 wrote:Who/what?
- nowinGA
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:06 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
You definitely should not go to the school if you will be unhappy, and from what you have stated here and elsewhere on TLS, you really are not interested in being in St. Louis. Law school is going to be challenging enough and you need to be somewhere where you will be able to focus on your studies and not on what or who is missing. It really is okay to not want to go to WashU...though most here probably wont agree because most here really want to go there.sibley wrote:County Crows' Omaha just told me not to go to WashU.
Go with your gut...it IS, in fact, okay to base your decision on something other than rankings. It truly is. I realize that fact is not always clear in TLS land...but it is okay, and, in your situation, probably preferable. I have heard many, many, many differing views from people all over the legal community. And many of those people would tell you take the greater scholarship money and comfort of being around those you love.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mazzini
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:16 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
chicoalto0649 wrote:sibley wrote:County Crows' Omaha just told me not to go to WashU.
Who/what?
I think she means the song by the CountING Crows. But it's best not to listen to them anyways =P
-
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I did mean counting... and come on, they're okay once in a while =)mazzini wrote:chicoalto0649 wrote:sibley wrote:County Crows' Omaha just told me not to go to WashU.
Who/what?
I think she means the song by the CountING Crows. But it's best not to listen to them anyways =P
nowinGA, I appreciate your continued support and kindly advice. I'm experiencing dissonance about the whole situation and am going to have to figure it out pretty darn soon. my best friend is going through the same thing (yale or ut-something, to be near her boyfriend at Baylor... both are far from her hawiian home) so we're absolutely useless to one another. I haven't talked to the boy about it lately... it's something I need to figure out mostly on my own... and he'll tell me to go to the best school. but maybe I should ask my mother. she's been taking our relationship seriously lately, telling me every single thing he does that she doesn't like. she's always been politely neutral in the past.
Last edited by sibley on Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- chicoalto0649
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:34 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
JUST GOT THE CALL!!!! IN OFF THE WAITLIST!!!!!!!!!11
for a class I really wanted at my UG
for a class I really wanted at my UG
-
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
chicoalto0649 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!! IN OFF THE WAITLIST!!!!!!!!!11
for a class I really wanted at my UG
1) congrats... I think! see 2).
2) whatttt?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
u killin me chicoaltochicoalto0649 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!! IN OFF THE WAITLIST!!!!!!!!!11
for a class I really wanted at my UG
- nowinGA
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:06 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
A call? really?chicoalto0649 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!! IN OFF THE WAITLIST!!!!!!!!!11
for a class I really wanted at my UG
CONGRATS!
- FunkyJD
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:38 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
FML. Good thing I withdrew yesterday.
Probably was a little hasty with that.
Probably was a little hasty with that.
- nowinGA
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:06 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I will say that I made a grad school decision in the past, based on a significant other, that I still regret. It was different and involved leaving school to be closer to him...I was young and dumb and regret it. That said...I am now old(er) and still probably just as dumb in terms of following my heart, so I appreciate your conundrum. I do not think I would do anything different if I could go back, even though I regret what I missed by making the choice. If that makes sense.sibley wrote:
nowinGA, I appreciate your continued support and kindly advice. I'm experiencing dissonance about the whole situation and am going to have to figure it out pretty darn soon. my best friend is going through the same thing (yale or ut-something, to be near her boyfriend at Baylor... both are far from her hawiian home) so we're absolutely useless to one another. I haven't talked to the boy about it lately... it's something I need to figure out mostly on my own... and he'll tell me to go to the best school. but maybe I should ask my mother. she's been taking our relationship seriously lately, telling me every single thing he does that she doesn't like. she's always been politely neutral in the past.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kswiss
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:58 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
He's messing with us.... he just got off the waitlist for a class he really wanted at his UG.chicoalto0649 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!! IN OFF THE WAITLIST!!!!!!!!!11
for a class I really wanted at my UG
My heart jumped for half a second and I was green with envy for a moment longer when I read the first part, then I relaxed and sighed at your shrewd use of small text.
- FunkyJD
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:38 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Damn you, chicoalto ... DAMN YOUUUUU!!!!
Don't take advantage of those of us with four eyes. (That be me.)
Don't take advantage of those of us with four eyes. (That be me.)
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
the part that got me all tripped out was that that he got a phone call. thought WUSTL didn't do that so at first i thought they were changing it up.kswiss wrote:He's messing with us.... he just got off the waitlist for a class he really wanted at his UG.chicoalto0649 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!! IN OFF THE WAITLIST!!!!!!!!!11
for a class I really wanted at my UG
My heart jumped for half a second and I was green with envy for a moment longer when I read the first part, then I relaxed and sighed at your shrewd use of small text.
that and hold list first!!!!!!!! (sorry waitlisters)
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:11 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Getting close to "that time of day"!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login