Re: Fordham Waiting Room
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:39 pm
Columbia Law wrote:Wow guys. What is going on with Fordham this year? This is rough.
Brother: 164/ 3.89; PT Waitlisted
Friend: 166/ 3.3x; PT Waitlisted
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=93652
Columbia Law wrote:Wow guys. What is going on with Fordham this year? This is rough.
Brother: 164/ 3.89; PT Waitlisted
Friend: 166/ 3.3x; PT Waitlisted
WHAT?! That's crazy, I'm sorrylawschoollll wrote:WL'ed just now.
172/3.53.
Possible, but I got the 172 on a February retake, so I don't think any of my apps went complete until that score came back (so like 3/1). I'm pretty sure I'm just in for a rough cycle. I have a job and I'll just reapply next September. Oh well!Kim617 wrote:WHAT?! That's crazy, I'm sorrylawschoollll wrote:WL'ed just now.
172/3.53.
It could be YP. And I say this because I really think they might assume you'd go somewhere else. I think I only avoided the WL because I tormented them day and night, so they figured I'd obviously have interest. I can't imagine any other reason they'd WL a 172. I know they say it's more than numbers, but a 172 is pretty awesome.
How did you find this out?chutzpah wrote:So it turns out they didn't count my second score. They are reevaluating now.
So sorry about the WL.lawschoollll wrote:WL'ed just now.
172/3.53.
YAYchutzpah wrote:So it turns out they didn't count my second score. They are reevaluating now.
Wow! That's a terror! How did your friend/brother find out? Email, snail or status?goosey wrote:Columbia Law wrote:Wow guys. What is going on with Fordham this year? This is rough.
Brother: 164/ 3.89; PT Waitlisted
Friend: 166/ 3.3x; PT Waitlisted
no, fordham does not close on the many holidays. but i heard that the classes on those days are ALWAYS recorded and made available to the jews who miss them.sibley wrote:ooohhh that was so cool! does Fordham do that too? Jews have SO many holidays it's great!hannah87 wrote:
i like the no-school-on-jewish-holidays bit.
what was your first?chutzpah wrote:So it turns out they didn't count my second score. They are reevaluating now.
165 then 174sibley wrote:what was your first?chutzpah wrote:So it turns out they didn't count my second score. They are reevaluating now.
nice! and lucky, bc they had both my scores =(chutzpah wrote:165 then 174sibley wrote:what was your first?chutzpah wrote:So it turns out they didn't count my second score. They are reevaluating now.
thanks... but I might still get WL.sibley wrote:nice! and lucky, bc they had both my scores =(chutzpah wrote:165 then 174sibley wrote:what was your first?chutzpah wrote:So it turns out they didn't count my second score. They are reevaluating now.
if you do then we know the world is on its head and the rest of us do not need to feel bad... nor should you, bc it's nuts. like your name.chutzpah wrote:thanks... but I might still get WL.sibley wrote:nice! and lucky, bc they had both my scores =(chutzpah wrote:165 then 174sibley wrote: what was your first?
All three via status checker.France121069 wrote:Wow! That's a terror! How did your friend/brother find out? Email, snail or status?goosey wrote:Columbia Law wrote:Wow guys. What is going on with Fordham this year? This is rough.
Brother: 164/ 3.89; PT Waitlisted
Friend: 166/ 3.3x; PT Waitlisted
nice! and lucky, bc they had both my scores =([/quote]dakatz wrote:165 then 174
Yikes, my PT chances are Fordham may not be as decent (ha?) as I thought they might be. Ack.Columbia Law wrote:All three via status checker.France121069 wrote:Wow! That's a terror! How did your friend/brother find out? Email, snail or status?goosey wrote:Columbia Law wrote:Wow guys. What is going on with Fordham this year? This is rough.
Brother: 164/ 3.89; PT Waitlisted
Friend: 166/ 3.3x; PT Waitlisted
ooh! i haven't decided what i'm wearing yet. i love the designer collections for target!!sibley wrote:
Hannah, I got a cute shirt at target! I may wear it on the 18th.
I don't have any pants yet to wear, as all my jeans are very holy (and may be worn anyway), so I would have preferred a dress but I didn't like theirs... and I'm cheap. and I was in target already.hannah87 wrote:ooh! i haven't decided what i'm wearing yet. i love the designer collections for target!!sibley wrote:
Hannah, I got a cute shirt at target! I may wear it on the 18th.