CorrectAmelie wrote:Which is April 30th, right? I'm afraid I'm going to mix up some of these deadlinesstarstruck393 wrote:Regular seat deposit. You don't have to formally accept it, if you enroll, it gets automatically applied.hykang wrote:Is there any deadline by which you need to accept a dean's scholarship? Or is it just the regular seat deposit deadline?
michigan 2010 applicants Forum
-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:19 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:33 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Sweet, thanks!starstruck393 wrote:CorrectAmelie wrote:Which is April 30th, right? I'm afraid I'm going to mix up some of these deadlinesstarstruck393 wrote:Regular seat deposit. You don't have to formally accept it, if you enroll, it gets automatically applied.hykang wrote:Is there any deadline by which you need to accept a dean's scholarship? Or is it just the regular seat deposit deadline?
- holybartender
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Admissions office scared the shit out of me with their response to my updated resume + loci. The gmail preview was "Congratulations on your ..." Open the email, finishes with "new position!"
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
That is sort of ... awfulholybartender wrote:Admissions office scared the shit out of me with their response to my updated resume + loci. The gmail preview was "Congratulations on your ..." Open the email, finishes with "new position!"
- holybartender
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Ann Arbor is trolling me. Dean Zearfoss is wise in the ways of the interwebs.r6_philly wrote:That is sort of ... awfulholybartender wrote:Admissions office scared the shit out of me with their response to my updated resume + loci. The gmail preview was "Congratulations on your ..." Open the email, finishes with "new position!"
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Except for the fact that they can't get a working waitlist survey system, and send cryptic emails in the middle of January to scare people. I guess they focus their attention on people they accepted, just like every other law school.holybartender wrote:Ann Arbor is trolling me. Dean Zearfoss is wise in the ways of the interwebs.r6_philly wrote:That is sort of ... awfulholybartender wrote:Admissions office scared the shit out of me with their response to my updated resume + loci. The gmail preview was "Congratulations on your ..." Open the email, finishes with "new position!"
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
It is taking them just about as long to answer my questions now than before. They are nice, but seem to be really busy.Jericwithers wrote:Except for the fact that they can't get a working waitlist survey system, and send cryptic emails in the middle of January to scare people. I guess they focus their attention on people they accepted, just like every other law school.holybartender wrote:Ann Arbor is trolling me. Dean Zearfoss is wise in the ways of the interwebs.r6_philly wrote:That is sort of ... awfulholybartender wrote:Admissions office scared the shit out of me with their response to my updated resume + loci. The gmail preview was "Congratulations on your ..." Open the email, finishes with "new position!"
- Kiersten1985
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry 2010 applicants
So how easy is it to get around Ann Arbor? I'm staying at the Candlewood Suites hotel, which is apparently like 3-4 miles from campus. Is it easy to hail cabs on campus? Do I need to print out some bus routes?
Also, if anyone's visiting 4/8 - 4/11 PLEASE PM ME! I don't want to wander around like a complete loser and I would enjoy checking out some nightlife.
Also, if anyone's visiting 4/8 - 4/11 PLEASE PM ME! I don't want to wander around like a complete loser and I would enjoy checking out some nightlife.
- beesknees
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:46 am
Re: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry 2010 applicants
.
Last edited by beesknees on Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:19 pm
Re: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry 2010 applicants
You'd really have to call one of the services; they're not frequent enough to hail
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry 2010 applicants
i sent a loci, via snail mail, 1.5 weeks ago, but haven't heard a thing. should i expect to receive confirmation (in any form) that mich received it? i wasn't expecting this, but i think i remember someone saying they had received a confirmation email. i would appreciate your input!
-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:19 pm
Re: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry 2010 applicants
I want to say the only time I got a confirmation was when I sent via email; nothing when I mailed hard copies. You can always shoot them a quick email to make sure they got it, and I'm sure they'll respond to that...roger8219 wrote:i sent a loci, via snail mail, 1.5 weeks ago, but haven't heard a thing. should i expect to receive confirmation (in any form) that mich received it? i wasn't expecting this, but i think i remember someone saying they had received a confirmation email. i would appreciate your input!
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry 2010 applicants
not to be a debbie downer...but there are over 200 WL's (out of about 900 UM apps) on LSN alone. i'm sure the ratio is somewhat skewed since it's not a representative sample, but they've gotten over 6,500 apps this year (they said a 20% increase from last year, which had 5,600 apps). even if you're an optimist and quarter the ratio on LSN, extrapolation still yields >350 people on the WL. i guess there's a little comfort in the fact that the number doesn't account for the masses of people who withdrew/are uninterested and de facto withdraw...(i'm on the WL, too...sob)...starstruck393 wrote:At least last year, they had said that traditionally the number was in that range.At it's peak I'd say it's in the 100-200 range, but certainly a number either don't accept, withdraw fairly quickly, or put in no effort (which is like a silent withdraw)dreamweaver87 wrote:Waitlisted today. 3.57, 170 LSAT. I applied really late, so I was expecting a rejection off the bat.
They said they accept 35-40 people off the waitlist? I wonder how many people they put on it...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
just got the waitlist e-mail
someone put me out of my misery, this cycle has been horrific
someone put me out of my misery, this cycle has been horrific
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Michigan has superiority issues. I think the 'Hoggwarts' reference here went to their head. So sorry to point this out but you might end up going to the same school as melos blancos wrote:just got the waitlist e-mail
someone put me out of my misery, this cycle has been horrific
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
If I hadn't gotten into Duke, I think this WL would have prompted me to dive headfirst out of a window.Jericwithers wrote:Michigan has superiority issues. I think the 'Hoggwarts' reference here went to their head. So sorry to point this out but you might end up going to the same school as melos blancos wrote:just got the waitlist e-mail
someone put me out of my misery, this cycle has been horrific
I already wrote what I felt was a fairly compelling Why Mich, I have no idea how I'm going to write them a LOCI.
- rupert.pupkin
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:07 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
.
Last edited by rupert.pupkin on Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Looking at LSN, looks like I'd have had a better shot if I answered 3 less questions right on the LSAT. Oh well.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
From the impression I got, I was one of the last, if not the last outright acceptances they were giving out. I don't think it is about you rather than they have reached the end of the acceptances. They use a mathematical formula that the stats people derived so I think once it's the end, it's the end. I wouldn't expect any more acceptances to come out until after seat deposits. But if your score is high, you stand a better chance, I think they have been conservative with their acceptances while expecting the yield to be lower.los blancos wrote:Looking at LSN, looks like I'd have had a better shot if I answered 3 less questions right on the LSAT. Oh well.
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
+1. During the ASW, I actually met a (hot female) statistics grad student who helped analyze the data to help predict yield rates and develop the formula.r6_philly wrote:From the impression I got, I was one of the last, if not the last outright acceptances they were giving out. I don't think it is about you rather than they have reached the end of the acceptances. They use a mathematical formula that the stats people derived so I think once it's the end, it's the end. I wouldn't expect any more acceptances to come out until after seat deposits. But if your score is high, you stand a better chance, I think they have been conservative with their acceptances while expecting the yield to be lower.los blancos wrote:Looking at LSN, looks like I'd have had a better shot if I answered 3 less questions right on the LSAT. Oh well.
- holydonkey
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Anyone going to DC reception on Wednesday?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Fair enough, and this is why I hate rolling admissions. It wasn't my choice to apply in early January, and yet it has absolutely murdered my cycle.r6_philly wrote:From the impression I got, I was one of the last, if not the last outright acceptances they were giving out. I don't think it is about you rather than they have reached the end of the acceptances. They use a mathematical formula that the stats people derived so I think once it's the end, it's the end. I wouldn't expect any more acceptances to come out until after seat deposits. But if your score is high, you stand a better chance, I think they have been conservative with their acceptances while expecting the yield to be lower.los blancos wrote:Looking at LSN, looks like I'd have had a better shot if I answered 3 less questions right on the LSAT. Oh well.
A lot of people are expecting a lot of WL action this year basically everywhere. But I'm probably going to withdraw because even if I do get in, they're not going to give me the $$ that Duke gave me.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
los blancos wrote:Fair enough, and this is why I hate rolling admissions. It wasn't my choice to apply in early January, and yet it has absolutely murdered my cycle.r6_philly wrote:From the impression I got, I was one of the last, if not the last outright acceptances they were giving out. I don't think it is about you rather than they have reached the end of the acceptances. They use a mathematical formula that the stats people derived so I think once it's the end, it's the end. I wouldn't expect any more acceptances to come out until after seat deposits. But if your score is high, you stand a better chance, I think they have been conservative with their acceptances while expecting the yield to be lower.los blancos wrote:Looking at LSN, looks like I'd have had a better shot if I answered 3 less questions right on the LSAT. Oh well.
A lot of people are expecting a lot of WL action this year basically everywhere. But I'm probably going to withdraw because even if I do get in, they're not going to give me the $$ that Duke gave me.
Probably not, looks like you need my numbers to get what I got, it's in line with LSN figures. Now I wish Duke will actually take a look at my file... This whole process is comical how it works.
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
+1 If small, private schools' undergrad admissions can get through 25k apps and pick 1600 without the use of rolling admissions, I don't see why law schools are unable to get through 10k apps and pick 1,000 without it. Granted I'm a splitter, but this cycle seems to have been ridiculous for lots of people.los blancos wrote:Fair enough, and this is why I hate rolling admissions. It wasn't my choice to apply in early January, and yet it has absolutely murdered my cycle.r6_philly wrote:From the impression I got, I was one of the last, if not the last outright acceptances they were giving out. I don't think it is about you rather than they have reached the end of the acceptances. They use a mathematical formula that the stats people derived so I think once it's the end, it's the end. I wouldn't expect any more acceptances to come out until after seat deposits. But if your score is high, you stand a better chance, I think they have been conservative with their acceptances while expecting the yield to be lower.los blancos wrote:Looking at LSN, looks like I'd have had a better shot if I answered 3 less questions right on the LSAT. Oh well.
A lot of people are expecting a lot of WL action this year basically everywhere. But I'm probably going to withdraw because even if I do get in, they're not going to give me the $$ that Duke gave me.
- Aeon
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:46 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I suspect that this is the case because the top law schools can afford to do so. People tend to pick higher-ranked schools above those that are ranked lower. Thus, there is a downward-wave effect as you move down the rankings: as individuals accept offers at the top schools, they free up spaces at the lower-ranked schools. If you are in charge of admissions at a lower-ranked school, it is to your school's advantage to not have rolling admissions, because you are likely to see greater perambulations in your candidate pool as some accept offers at higher-ranked schools and others accept greater scholarship offers from schools ranked lower than yours.stratocophic wrote:+1 If small, private schools' undergrad admissions can get through 25k apps and pick 1600 without the use of rolling admissions, I don't see why law schools are unable to get through 10k apps and pick 1,000 without it. Granted I'm a splitter, but this cycle seems to have been ridiculous for lots of people.
Also, rolling admissions has the side-effect of allowing schools to more effectively gauge the relative interest of applicants. Someone who submits an application within the first week that it is available is likely to be more interested in the school or is at least a highly-motivated individual. Regardless, chances are that the school would like to capture as many of these applicants as they can, assuming that these applicants meet the school's baseline requirements (such as with GPA/LSAT, not having a history of offenses, etc.). In this way, applying early in a cycle is like having a decent soft factor.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login