Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
Mardou
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:33 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby Mardou » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:06 pm

chicoalto0649 wrote:
sibley wrote:
megster_29 wrote:So I already posted this, but I am not on the list.

UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23
164/3.89

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.


sorry... either missed you or had issues finding your stats



3.3 163 urm with an update today.


Update today as well (from 3/9, my first under review date), URM with similar stats as chicoalto

sibley
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby sibley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:18 pm

megster_29 wrote:So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.

I like this analysis, mostly because it makes me feel like I have a little bit better chance than a snowball in hell.

Another update, just because if we're going to keep track of this it's easier to do it excessively... sorry if I'm spamming you.

Ok y'all... here's what we're going to do. Post your most recent UR date, along with your stats. Let's see if we can see some sort of pattern. Anyone not listed add... or update!

3/16 170/3.34 Sibley DR 3/24
2/17 167/3.4 pollaclc
3/16 167/3.6 SaintClarence27
2/19 (complete date) with 174/3.64. Held for Feb Score. chutzpah
3/16 3.6, 169 cardinalandgold
3/16 168/3.3 flowerpot
2/12 170/3.0 shadow.
3/23 170/2.8 taw856
3/24 PT 163, 3.2 DeSilentio2728
3/23 164/3.4 heyzeus
3/23 164/3.89 megster_29UR
3/24 3.3 163 urm chicoalto0649
3/24 ~3.3 ~163 URM Mardou
3/23 167/3.41 Schnauzerlover
Last edited by sibley on Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:07 pm, edited 4 times in total.

schnauzerlover
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:42 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby schnauzerlover » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:26 pm

sibley wrote:
megster_29 wrote:So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.

I like this analysis, mostly because it makes me feel like I have a little bit better chance than a snowball in hell.

Another update, just because if we're going to keep track of this it's easier to do it excessively... sorry if I'm spamming you.

Ok y'all... here's what we're going to do. Post your most recent UR date, along with your stats. Let's see if we can see some sort of pattern. Anyone not listed add... or update!

    3/16 - 170/3.34
    2/17 167/3.4
3/16 - 170/3.34
pollaclc wrote:good idea!
2/17 167/3.4 (LSP weak consider)

SaintClarence27 wrote:3/16 167/3.6

chutzpah wrote:COMPLETE 2/19 with 174/3.64. Held for Feb Score.

cardinalandgold wrote:3/16 3.6, 169

flowerpot wrote:3/16, 168/3.3

chicoalto0649 wrote:Just updated from 2/12 to 3-23-weird that it changed on the 24th

shadow. wrote:Complete 1/13, UR 2/12, no further changes 170/3.0

taw856 wrote:UR 2/17 --> UR 3/23. 170/2.8

DeSilentio2728 wrote:UR 3/9, UR 3/24 PT 163, 3.2

heyzeus wrote:UR 2/5 UR 2/19 --- UR 3/23 164/3.4

megster_29 wrote:UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23 164/3.89

chicoalto0649 wrote:3/24 3.3 163 urm

Mardou wrote: 3/9-->3/24 ~3.3 ~163 URM


UR 3/23 167/3.41

megster_29
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:16 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby megster_29 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:28 pm

sibley wrote:
megster_29 wrote:So I already posted this, but I am not on the list.

UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23
164/3.89

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.



I meant to write that those of us in this group are EITHER low LSAT splitters OR people who have both stats at or below the 25th, not that all of us have both LSATs and GPAs below the 25th. Also, it seems like a few of those with lower numbers are URM's... so that changes things a bit as well. I really don't know what to think.

User avatar
cyh
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 7:19 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby cyh » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:29 pm

megster_29 wrote:
sibley wrote:
megster_29 wrote:So I already posted this, but I am not on the list.

UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23
164/3.89

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.



I meant to write that those of us in this group are EITHER low LSAT splitters OR people who have both stats at or below the 25th, not that all of us have both LSATs and GPAs below the 25th. Also, it seems like a few of those with lower numbers are URM's... so that changes things a bit as well. I really don't know what to think.



+1

megster_29
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:16 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby megster_29 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:30 pm

Also interesting is that scarletlady did not get a DR before her ding, which is putting me even more on edge.

jman77
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:33 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby jman77 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:33 pm

Just changed to UR 3/24 from previous 3/9 (this was the first UR date). Stats in profile.

sibley
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby sibley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:34 pm

megster_29 wrote:Also interesting is that scarletlady did not get a DR before her ding, which is putting me even more on edge.


she didn't? I was leaving her off the list bc I guess it doesn't really apply to what we're trying to figure out.. but her info is definitely good to keep in mind.

sibley
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby sibley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:41 pm

Anyone not listed add... or update!

1/12 PT 163/4.0 savesthedayajb
2/12 170/3.0 shadow.
2/17 167/3.4 pollaclc
2/19 (complete date) 174/3.64. Held for Feb Score. chutzpah
3/16 170/3.34 sibley
3/16 167/3.6 SaintClarence27
3/16 169/3.6 cardinalandgold
3/16 168/3.3 flowerpot
3/23 170/2.8 taw856
3/23 164/3.4 heyzeus
3/23 164/3.89 megster_29
3/23 167/3.41 Schnauzerlover
3/23 167/3.67 madforsadness
3/24 PT 163/3.2 DeSilentio2728
3/24 3.3 163 urm chicoalto0649
3/24 ~3.3 ~163 URM Mardou
3/24 167/3.9 (late app) jman77
Last edited by sibley on Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm, edited 5 times in total.

madforsadness
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:36 am

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby madforsadness » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:48 pm

I'm in the 3/23 group as well, updated from 2/19. 167, international (so unofficial) 3.67.

User avatar
chutzpah
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:16 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby chutzpah » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:50 pm

I dont think my situation will fit into any discernable pattern. There are applicants with similar numbers who went complete in early March and have already heard decisions. I am an outlier, an exception, a "which one of these doesn't belong". ugh

As for the splitters, it certainly makes sense that they're holding onto your applications until they have a good sense of where they are in relation to the medians.

sibley
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby sibley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:51 pm

chutzpah wrote:I dont think my situation will fit into any discernable pattern. There are applicants with similar numbers who went complete in early March and have already heard decisions. I am an outlier, an exception, a "which one of these doesn't belong". ugh

As for the splitters, it certainly makes sense that they're holding onto your applications until they have a good sense of where they are in relation to the medians.


you're sure they still have your app?
maybe they're waiting to see where else you get in. if you get (edit) columbia or something like that they probably won't want to mess with you
Last edited by sibley on Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

savesthedayajb
Posts: 528
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:21 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby savesthedayajb » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:53 pm

UR 1/12 163/4.0 PT

User avatar
chutzpah
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:16 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby chutzpah » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

sibley wrote:
chutzpah wrote:I dont think my situation will fit into any discernable pattern. There are applicants with similar numbers who went complete in early March and have already heard decisions. I am an outlier, an exception, a "which one of these doesn't belong". ugh

As for the splitters, it certainly makes sense that they're holding onto your applications until they have a good sense of where they are in relation to the medians.


you're sure they still have your app?
maybe they're waiting to see where else you get in. if you get (edit) columbia or something like that they probably won't want to mess with you


Yup, I have an ongoing correspondence with a lady in admissions who most recently told me that it can take up to 6-8 weeks for an application to go from "complete" to "under review". I indicated that my application was originally complete on DECEMBER 3RD.

eaters333
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:50 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby eaters333 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:05 pm

so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?

sibley
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby sibley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:06 pm

eaters333 wrote:so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?


oh FUCK mine says that now too. let's hope not.

User avatar
SaintClarence27
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:48 am

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby SaintClarence27 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:07 pm

.
Last edited by SaintClarence27 on Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jman77
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:33 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby jman77 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:07 pm

sibley wrote:
eaters333 wrote:so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?


oh FUCK mine says that now too. let's hope not.


Try logging into the admitted students website.

sibley
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby sibley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:07 pm

eaters333 wrote:so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?


were you previously 3/16?

User avatar
Kim617
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby Kim617 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:07 pm

sibley wrote:
megster_29 wrote:Also interesting is that scarletlady did not get a DR before her ding, which is putting me even more on edge.


she didn't? I was leaving her off the list bc I guess it doesn't really apply to what we're trying to figure out.. but her info is definitely good to keep in mind.

i'm not sure i ever went DR either. i checked about a week before i received my letter, and it still said complete 12/9. so in less than a week i guess it could've went Complete->UR->DR but would all that have happened in time for me to receive the letter? weird. i guess maybe i should've been more obsessive about my status checker.

User avatar
chutzpah
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:16 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby chutzpah » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:08 pm

Good news comes via postal mail, bad and WL news comes via email. It might take a few days.

eaters333
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:50 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby eaters333 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:08 pm

sibley wrote:
eaters333 wrote:so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?


were you previously 3/16?




ya

User avatar
cardinalandgold
Posts: 554
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:00 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby cardinalandgold » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:09 pm

Also just went DR...GULP :?

sibley
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby sibley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:09 pm

chutzpah wrote:Good news comes via postal mail, bad and WL news comes via email. It might take a few days.



ughhhh why not immediate. this can't be good news. if it was good news they would have held onto us longer. right?

User avatar
SaintClarence27
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:48 am

Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)

Postby SaintClarence27 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:09 pm

.
Last edited by SaintClarence27 on Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”