rondemarino wrote:shadowfrost000 wrote:rondemarino wrote:ruleser wrote:Especially with the tuition increase, I don't think so - but with the larger ap pool, I think they are going to try - which is why the person was just WL'd and not dinged.
Duke and Michigan haven't handed out too many ED acceptances at their 2009 medians - 169. I'd imagine UCLA shares their optimism.
Also, UCLA WLs everyone and their uncle.
I see us getting WL. Am I correct in thinking if LSAT medians are the target, that either the schools would collectively all aim slightly higher than their usual numbers, or that splitters might be increasingly appealing since they aren't guaranteed better admission? Wishful thinking maybe.
You're spot on. If schools are targeting higher medians, you can't let go of the splitters have limited options. Look at Penn and UVA who last year were more generous to high LSATs with 3.0ish GPAs than those with 3.5ish GPAs.
Engineers with 75th percentile numbers committed via ED? I'm almost sure we're both in.
You make my wildest dreams come true, especially since I know you're good at math.