UCLA?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 4:57 pm
Re: UCLA?
man...you all have this law school thing down to a science!
- weee
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:34 pm
Re: UCLA?
There's still movement
http://ucla.lawschoolnumbers.com/applic ... order=desc
just not so much reported on TLS I suppose
http://ucla.lawschoolnumbers.com/applic ... order=desc
just not so much reported on TLS I suppose
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:18 am
- lawschoolmike
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:21 pm
Re: UCLA?
went complete late January. No word other than the "complete email." Is it possible they have not even looked at my file? Or do they run a preliminary scan through all files for auto admits and rejections?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:45 pm
Re: UCLA?
They don't use pure rolling admissions, so there has to be some sorting and preliminary reviewing going on. My guess is that not having received a decision by now probably indicates a de-facto hold.
What exactly does this mean? I've been complete since January and haven't heard back either, and probably have WL numbers. Do they not want to stick you on a WL because they're considering admitting you? I don't see it being a flat out rejection, as I got WLed with a lower LSAT in last year's cycle.
- autarkh
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Re: UCLA?
siaynoqq wrote:They don't use pure rolling admissions, so there has to be some sorting and preliminary reviewing going on. My guess is that not having received a decision by now probably indicates a de-facto hold.
What exactly does this mean? I've been complete since January and haven't heard back either, and probably have WL numbers. Do they not want to stick you on a WL because they're considering admitting you? I don't see it being a flat out rejection, as I got WLed with a lower LSAT in last year's cycle.
That's my chosen interpretation. Self-serving and hopelessly naive as it may be.

-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:45 pm
Re: UCLA?
autarkh wrote:siaynoqq wrote:They don't use pure rolling admissions, so there has to be some sorting and preliminary reviewing going on. My guess is that not having received a decision by now probably indicates a de-facto hold.
What exactly does this mean? I've been complete since January and haven't heard back either, and probably have WL numbers. Do they not want to stick you on a WL because they're considering admitting you? I don't see it being a flat out rejection, as I got WLed with a lower LSAT in last year's cycle.
That's my chosen interpretation. Self-serving and hopelessly naive as it may be.
Would you mind sharing your numbers? You can PM me if you'd like.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:12 pm
Re: UCLA?
roundabout wrote:Jericwithers wrote:roundabout wrote:I know this is seriously annoying, but I can't find it elsewhere in the thread or searching- can anyone explain or link me to info about the tuition increases? Only thing I could find was a 2007 article. Thanks in advance!
http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/regents/regmeet/nov09/f2.pdf
Great, thanks very much.
So I was just looking at the state residency requirements- here, under the "intent" to settle in CA section, it lists licensing for professional practice in CA. Does that mean you'd have to take the bar in CA?
--LinkRemoved--
This is late, but I'm wondering the same thing.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:48 pm
Re: UCLA?
OMG!!!!!! I JUST GOT THE CALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I GOT IN. I did not expect this in a million years. I already accepted another school because I did not expect this at all.
And I found out today that I am valedictorian.
And I am on my way to stagecoach.
TODAY IS CRAZY!!!!!
And I found out today that I am valedictorian.
And I am on my way to stagecoach.
TODAY IS CRAZY!!!!!
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:07 pm
Re: UCLA?
Kase Law wrote:OMG!!!!!! I JUST GOT THE CALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I GOT IN. I did not expect this in a million years. I already accepted another school because I did not expect this at all.
And I found out today that I am valedictorian.
And I am on my way to stagecoach.
TODAY IS CRAZY!!!!!
Hey congratulations!!! So... are you coming to UCLA??
edit: Kase: I replied to your PM, but it is sitting in my outbox... did you get it?
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:48 pm
Re: UCLA?
SaraLA wrote:Kase Law wrote:OMG!!!!!! I JUST GOT THE CALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I GOT IN. I did not expect this in a million years. I already accepted another school because I did not expect this at all.
And I found out today that I am valedictorian.
And I am on my way to stagecoach.
TODAY IS CRAZY!!!!!
Hey congratulations!!! So... are you coming to UCLA??
edit: Kase: I replied to your PM, but it is sitting in my outbox... did you get it?
yes I did


- NervousInKC
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:45 pm
Re: UCLA?
Kase Law wrote:OMG!!!!!! I JUST GOT THE CALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I GOT IN. I did not expect this in a million years. I already accepted another school because I did not expect this at all.
And I found out today that I am valedictorian.
And I am on my way to stagecoach.
TODAY IS CRAZY!!!!!
Congrats!! Sorry if you've already said this, but what are your stats and when did you go complete?
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:48 pm
Re: UCLA?
NervousInKC wrote:Kase Law wrote:OMG!!!!!! I JUST GOT THE CALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I GOT IN. I did not expect this in a million years. I already accepted another school because I did not expect this at all.
And I found out today that I am valedictorian.
And I am on my way to stagecoach.
TODAY IS CRAZY!!!!!
Congrats!! Sorry if you've already said this, but what are your stats and when did you go complete?
Thanks

- mmmadeli
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:54 pm
Re: UCLA?
Kase Law wrote:NervousInKC wrote:Kase Law wrote:OMG!!!!!! I JUST GOT THE CALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I GOT IN. I did not expect this in a million years. I already accepted another school because I did not expect this at all.
And I found out today that I am valedictorian.
And I am on my way to stagecoach.
TODAY IS CRAZY!!!!!
Congrats!! Sorry if you've already said this, but what are your stats and when did you go complete?
ThanksComplete 1/29, and stats: 4.0/165
holy splitter, batman. That's awesome!
- legalease9
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: UCLA?
Some of you may want to call UCLA. I called them on Friday, and they said that the decision was made early in the week but that they forgot to email me. So they will email me on Monday.
-
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:33 pm
Re: UCLA?
legalease9 wrote:Some of you may want to call UCLA. I called them on Friday, and they said that the decision was made early in the week but that they forgot to email me. So they will email me on Monday.
Not to be a party pooper... but doesn't e-mail typically mean bad news, i.e., WL/reject?
- legalease9
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: UCLA?
jman77 wrote:legalease9 wrote:Some of you may want to call UCLA. I called them on Friday, and they said that the decision was made early in the week but that they forgot to email me. So they will email me on Monday.
Not to be a party pooper... but doesn't e-mail typically mean bad news, i.e., WL/reject?
Lol, yeah I posted a question about this and that's what someone else told me.

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists�