UCLA?

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
SaraT
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:08 am

Re: UCLA?

Postby SaraT » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:14 pm

savesthedayajb wrote:Still not complete, submitted 12/22. How long does this usually take?

i submitted 10/26 and went complete 11/3. im guessing yours will take longer because of the holidays that were in between.

User avatar
summerschooled
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby summerschooled » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:35 pm

savesthedayajb wrote:Still not complete, submitted 12/22. How long does this usually take?

I went complete so long ago that I almost forgot I'd applied -- I've been waiting since October and still haven't heard anything.

User avatar
wackjickham
Posts: 458
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby wackjickham » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:47 pm

WL'd on 1/5 with what I thought were Auto-Numbers for UCLA. I guess my GPA was a little low for them, and I'm not too worried about it because I dont think I actually would have attended, but it is a little unnerving because I think it might say something about the quality of my softs.

pinkhearts
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:19 am

Re: UCLA?

Postby pinkhearts » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:01 pm

got a call yesterday night from the dean, how exciting/weird!

i went complete in early nov if that is helpful info.

User avatar
tintin
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am

Re: UCLA?

Postby tintin » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:22 pm

summerschooled wrote:I went complete so long ago that I almost forgot I'd applied -- I've been waiting since October and still haven't heard anything.


+1 :roll:

User avatar
GobiasIndustries
Posts: 358
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby GobiasIndustries » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:25 pm

tintin wrote:
summerschooled wrote:I went complete so long ago that I almost forgot I'd applied -- I've been waiting since October and still haven't heard anything.


+1 :roll:


+2 :roll: :roll:

wired
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby wired » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:27 pm

GobiasIndustries wrote:
tintin wrote:
summerschooled wrote:I went complete so long ago that I almost forgot I'd applied -- I've been waiting since October and still haven't heard anything.


+1 :roll:


+2 :roll: :roll:


+3. :D I am a fringe applicant. The longer I don't hear back, the more I think they have accepted me.

User avatar
Mroberts3
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:10 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby Mroberts3 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:46 pm

3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.

I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.

Good luck to everyone else!

User avatar
Faesha
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 3:03 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby Faesha » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:52 pm

Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.

I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.

Good luck to everyone else!


I mean this in the kindest possible way... But I really would have thought you'd have gotten at least a waitlist with those numbers. I'm sorry to hear this!

bconly
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby bconly » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:03 pm

Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.

I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.

Good luck to everyone else!


I just got the bad news too. I was hoping for the WL, but I guess it is hypercompetitive this year. 166/3.5

User avatar
SanBun
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby SanBun » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:22 pm

bconly wrote:
Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.

I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.

Good luck to everyone else!


I just got the bad news too. I was hoping for the WL, but I guess it is hypercompetitive this year. 166/3.5


damn, UCLA is super competitive this year. Sorry to hear that, I hope you guys get your other schools.
when did you two go complete, if you don't mind me asking?

is it reasonable to assume that as a borderline applicant having gone complete 11/03, the longer I don't hear back the better?

User avatar
Slansky
Posts: 142
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:40 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby Slansky » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:53 pm

I went complete on 10/23, FYI (accepted yesterday).

Just to revive the question...did you scholly admits hear about money in the phone call or did that come in the letter?

:mrgreen:

User avatar
Veritas
Posts: 2722
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby Veritas » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:59 pm

I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.

User avatar
calicocat
Posts: 1099
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby calicocat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:01 pm

Veritas wrote:I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.

BUTTERS! :( I'm sad. No news from anywhere and Berk faculty review emails went out (did not get one).

User avatar
Veritas
Posts: 2722
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby Veritas » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:04 pm

Oli wrote:
Veritas wrote:I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.

BUTTERS! :( I'm sad. No news from anywhere and Berk faculty review emails went out (did not get one).

Oli, I didn't receive one either! :(

Sometimes, no news is good news (maybe not for berk, but for other schools). Keep your chin up, it's going to work out great.

User avatar
Vegas_Rebel
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:18 am

Re: UCLA?

Postby Vegas_Rebel » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:07 pm

Veritas wrote:
Oli wrote:
Veritas wrote:I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.

BUTTERS! :( I'm sad. No news from anywhere and Berk faculty review emails went out (did not get one).

Oli, I didn't receive one either! :(

Sometimes, no news is good news (maybe not for berk, but for other schools). Keep your chin up, it's going to work out great.


That's three of us.

Likely dinged at Mich, no Berk Email, and I'm banking on a UCLA ding given the numbers of some who have already been dinged. Bloodbath day.

User avatar
SanBun
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby SanBun » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:08 pm

Vegas_Rebel wrote:That's three of us.

Likely dinged at Mich, no Berk Email, and I'm banking on a UCLA ding given the numbers of some who have already been dinged. Bloodbath day.


yeah same. fuck law school.

User avatar
calicocat
Posts: 1099
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby calicocat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:09 pm

Veritas wrote:
Oli wrote:
Veritas wrote:I was expecting a ding in my mail box today. Quite relieved it was not there.

BUTTERS! :( I'm sad. No news from anywhere and Berk faculty review emails went out (did not get one).

Oli, I didn't receive one either! :(

Sometimes, no news is good news (maybe not for berk, but for other schools). Keep your chin up, it's going to work out great.

I hope so...getting pretty discouraged though...

User avatar
calicocat
Posts: 1099
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby calicocat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:10 pm

SanBun wrote:
Vegas_Rebel wrote:That's three of us.

Likely dinged at Mich, no Berk Email, and I'm banking on a UCLA ding given the numbers of some who have already been dinged. Bloodbath day.


yeah same. fuck law school.

+1 I kind of know how people felt while waiting for the guillotine.

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby 02082010 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:01 am

Dinged via snail mail. 172 2.71 AA male, OOS. Not too concerned. I only applied bc my ex lives in LA now and I thought it'd be fun to go visit her during ASW and ditch all the planned events.

User avatar
Mroberts3
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:10 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby Mroberts3 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:07 am

SanBun wrote:
bconly wrote:
Mroberts3 wrote:3.66/167 just got dinged via snail mail today.

I wasn't banking on UCLA, but looking at LSN I kinda thought I would at least get a WL. Oh well, that's what happens when 200,000 people take the LSAT in one year. Also, stupid me for going to an undergrad with no grade inflation...3.9/167 would probably have been an acceptance.

Good luck to everyone else!


I just got the bad news too. I was hoping for the WL, but I guess it is hypercompetitive this year. 166/3.5


damn, UCLA is super competitive this year. Sorry to hear that, I hope you guys get your other schools.
when did you two go complete, if you don't mind me asking?

is it reasonable to assume that as a borderline applicant having gone complete 11/03, the longer I don't hear back the better?


I went complete in mid November. I'm not sure whether a lack of info is good or bad. Looking at LSN, there doesn't seem to be a correlations...rejections WL and acceptances have all been rolling in since dec.

FWIW I'm one of those applicants for whom the stats are a pretty good indicator (not splitter, white male, 1-2 out of UG, good UG, no negative softs but nothing special either)

User avatar
Veritas
Posts: 2722
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby Veritas » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:36 am

complete since 11/3, but no word. I'm in San Diego, so I would have gotten the most recent decisions sent out.

I really wish I was in the adcomms heads!

User avatar
Gwen
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:54 am

Re: UCLA?

Postby Gwen » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:38 am

Veritas wrote:complete since 11/3, but no word. I'm in San Diego, so I would have gotten the most recent decisions sent out.

I really wish I was in the adcomms heads!

Congrats on San Diego!

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby 02082010 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:42 am

caliborn wrote:
Veritas wrote:complete since 11/3, but no word. I'm in San Diego, so I would have gotten the most recent decisions sent out.

I really wish I was in the adcomms heads!

Congrats on San Diego!


He lives in San Deigo.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: UCLA?

Postby CardinalRules » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:44 am

hopefulundergrad wrote:
caliborn wrote:
Veritas wrote:complete since 11/3, but no word. I'm in San Diego, so I would have gotten the most recent decisions sent out.

I really wish I was in the adcomms heads!

Congrats on San Diego!


He lives in San Deigo.


Living there deserves congratulations too. Not everyone gets to go to heaven before they die. :D




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: arthrod, dala77, Google Adsense [Bot], siyuanff and 3 guests