UCLA? Forum
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:33 pm
Re: UCLA?
wow...it's 100% go and read back through all the quotes. And even if that's not what it meant and it was a "high probability" I will take that instead of a low one. Gluck in LS you're going to need it.finalaspects wrote:Yes, but that inference wasn't necessarily 100%. High probability but not 100%.Every1Needs2Chill wrote: It's called making inferences, he posted that and has been calling me a "flamer" a rude degrading homosexual insult that should not be tolerated by any student pursuing a law degree. If you failed to make inferences on the LSAT that's your problem, and based off this small sample, I see that it's a possibility.
and you manged to avoid my question on why you came back, after stating that you wouldn't?
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:33 pm
Re: UCLA?
Yes Butters, Yes.Veritas wrote:did you make an alt?
- MC Southstar
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: UCLA?
LAWL GL at LIFe bro! Can't even let your own flaming go! However are you gonna deal with reality?Every1Needs2Chill wrote:wow...it's 100% go and read back through all the quotes. And even if that's not what it meant and it was a "high probability" I will take that instead of a low one. Gluck in LS you're going to need it.finalaspects wrote:Yes, but that inference wasn't necessarily 100%. High probability but not 100%.Every1Needs2Chill wrote: It's called making inferences, he posted that and has been calling me a "flamer" a rude degrading homosexual insult that should not be tolerated by any student pursuing a law degree. If you failed to make inferences on the LSAT that's your problem, and based off this small sample, I see that it's a possibility.
and you manged to avoid my question on why you came back, after stating that you wouldn't?
- Jacques
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:59 pm
Re: UCLA?
Every1Needs2Chill, for what it's worth, I have no problem with you -- if I had some sweet acceptances like that, I'd be proud of them too. How you choose to express that pride is your own choice.
This being said, for what it's worth, this thread is designed for updates to status, admission, waitlist, denial, etc. In future years, applicants will call this thread up to look at it as a resource, to compare their own numbers, etc. with those that were reported here (much as I have done, myself, with previous year's threads).
They're not going to want to wade through a dozen pages of flame wars, trust me. I'm very happy for you, and that you've been accepted to UCLA. I hope to be accepted as well. Now that you've reported your acceptance, your role here is over, much as mine will be once I have a final result from the school, positive or negative.
There are quite literally hundreds of OT threads on this website, places that you can go and talk yourself up, compare results with others, heck, make your own thread about how awesome it is to get two acceptances into two top 20 schools this early in the game.
The UCLA acceptance thread, and for that matter, any acceptance thread, just isn't the place to do it; please, go explore the rest of the site and have yourself a ball.
This being said, for what it's worth, this thread is designed for updates to status, admission, waitlist, denial, etc. In future years, applicants will call this thread up to look at it as a resource, to compare their own numbers, etc. with those that were reported here (much as I have done, myself, with previous year's threads).
They're not going to want to wade through a dozen pages of flame wars, trust me. I'm very happy for you, and that you've been accepted to UCLA. I hope to be accepted as well. Now that you've reported your acceptance, your role here is over, much as mine will be once I have a final result from the school, positive or negative.
There are quite literally hundreds of OT threads on this website, places that you can go and talk yourself up, compare results with others, heck, make your own thread about how awesome it is to get two acceptances into two top 20 schools this early in the game.
The UCLA acceptance thread, and for that matter, any acceptance thread, just isn't the place to do it; please, go explore the rest of the site and have yourself a ball.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: UCLA?
Sun came up everyday for the last 1000 years. You cannot make a 100% inference that it will still come up tomorrow. I understand your point about taking your chances with the high probability though.Every1Needs2Chill wrote:wow...it's 100% go and read back through all the quotes. And even if that's not what it meant and it was a "high probability" I will take that instead of a low one. Gluck in LS you're going to need it.finalaspects wrote:Yes, but that inference wasn't necessarily 100%. High probability but not 100%.Every1Needs2Chill wrote: It's called making inferences, he posted that and has been calling me a "flamer" a rude degrading homosexual insult that should not be tolerated by any student pursuing a law degree. If you failed to make inferences on the LSAT that's your problem, and based off this small sample, I see that it's a possibility.
and you manged to avoid my question on why you came back, after stating that you wouldn't?
And if you still think it was 100%, its no wonder that i scored higher than you on the LSAT.
And you manged to avoid my question again. Nice.
- rondemarino
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:29 am
Re: UCLA?
I thought you were a mod?Veritas wrote:oh good, that's against the rules.Every1Needs2Chill wrote:Yes Butters, Yes.Veritas wrote:did you make an alt?
reported.
- jgulia45
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:03 am
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: UCLA?
Taken care of.Jacques wrote:Thank you. Any way to lock down an IP addy?Helmholtz wrote:Banned for eternity. Jesus, I don't want to deal with these morons today.Every1Needs2Chill wrote:Yes Butters, Yes.Veritas wrote:did you make an alt?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bighead715
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:02 am
Re: UCLA?
BUT HELMMMHelmholtz wrote:Banned for eternity. Jesus, I don't want to deal with these morons today.Every1Needs2Chill wrote:Yes Butters, Yes.Veritas wrote:did you make an alt?
i was so going to throw more logs under that fire! you could of left him around for another 15 minutes or so i could jump into the fray...
- panadera
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:36 pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TooHot4TLS
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:13 pm
Re: UCLA?
wow you boys sure do have a lot of time on your hands
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: UCLA?
Oh boy, are you really back?TooHot4TLS wrote:wow you boys sure do have a lot of time on your hands
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: UCLA?
Sorry. My apologies. The fact that it was your first post raised a red flag.TooHot4TLS wrote:?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login