Optimistic, but perhaps irrationally so. Been complete since late October.imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
UCLA? Forum
- Hopefullawstudent
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:35 pm
Re: UCLA?
- Veritas
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: UCLA?
complete since 11/3, but they haven't done a round of rejections yet, so I'm nervous being a borderline applicant.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Optimistic, but perhaps irrationally so. Been complete since late October.imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:11 am
Re: UCLA?
In the same boat and irrational in the sense that getting into Texas made me excited for UCLA. That's in my heart. In my head i know i'd have a better chance at predicting law school acceptances by flinging water balloons at a dart board.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Optimistic, but perhaps irrationally so. Been complete since late October.imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: UCLA?
there are rejections on lsn. have they done a big round of non-auto-admitted RD acceptances yet? I heard on this board and seen on LSN that they have done at least a small round of RD WL'sVeritas wrote:complete since 11/3, but they haven't done a round of rejections yet, so I'm nervous being a borderline applicant.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Optimistic, but perhaps irrationally so. Been complete since late October.imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
and yes getting into UT made me optimistic too but it seems that UCLA is considerably harder to get into
- jay115
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: UCLA?
Eh I think UCLA just takes longer to respond, but isn't necessarily harder to get into. On LSN, if you compare the UTX and UCLA graphs, they're essentially the same - this cycle, UTX has even been rejecting a lot of peeps with superstar stats.imisscollege wrote:there are rejections on lsn. have they done a big round of non-auto-admitted RD acceptances yet? I heard on this board and seen on LSN that they have done at least a small round of RD WL'sVeritas wrote:complete since 11/3, but they haven't done a round of rejections yet, so I'm nervous being a borderline applicant.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Optimistic, but perhaps irrationally so. Been complete since late October.imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
and yes getting into UT made me optimistic too but it seems that UCLA is considerably harder to get into
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Veritas
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: UCLA?
IIRC those are ED rejections, not RD.imisscollege wrote:there are rejections on lsn. have they done a big round of non-auto-admitted RD acceptances yet? I heard on this board and seen on LSN that they have done at least a small round of RD WL'sVeritas wrote:complete since 11/3, but they haven't done a round of rejections yet, so I'm nervous being a borderline applicant.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Optimistic, but perhaps irrationally so. Been complete since late October.imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
and yes getting into UT made me optimistic too but it seems that UCLA is considerably harder to get into
- Hopefullawstudent
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:35 pm
Re: UCLA?
UCLA has done ED rejections. Have they done any RD rejections yet?
I was held over at Texas in November. A bad sign for UCLA?
I was held over at Texas in November. A bad sign for UCLA?
- Slansky
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:40 pm
Re: UCLA?
Agree. It's making me very insecure about my app. And UCLA is my top choice, so I am seriously invested in this oneparker09 wrote:Unsure about my optimism/pessimism ratio, but Really Pissed About Not Hearing Back Yet. Not that I'm feeling entitled to a quick decision, but it's certainly frustrating when other people with or below my numbers AND who submitted later have already gotten a decision. I didn't even want them that badly until it became apparent that they're not dying to have meSlansky wrote:I'm not!imisscollege wrote:so what about those of us who have been RD and nothing since October? are we optimistic or not
SRSLY, UCLA. COME ONNNNN!
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm
Re: UCLA?
WL via email yesterday, will not be sticking around. Good luck everyone. LSN in profile.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: UCLA?
I know you weren't asking me, but my GPA is a 3.45+ (LSAT's in profile).rw2264 wrote:what is your mediocre gpa? i'm also the 98th percentile and also consider my GPA to be mediocre.ughOSU wrote:WL via email. 98%ile LSAT and mediocre GPA.
Fuck law school.
- ruleser
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:41 am
Re: UCLA?
Holy Mother of Mary's Mother - they waitlisted you with that LSAT - yeah, I know, GPA, but... guess I should start assessing what clothes I'll need for colder climates...oneforship wrote:WL via email yesterday, will not be sticking around. Good luck everyone. LSN in profile.
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UCLA?
Congrats on Michigan. And second congrats on having the good sense to withdraw from UCLA. Now that in-state tuition is on par with private counterparts, (high CoL + limited job mobility + weak CA legal market) makes UCLA so not worth the risk for people with 170+s.Helmholtz wrote:I know you weren't asking me, but my GPA is a 3.45+ (LSAT's in profile).rw2264 wrote:what is your mediocre gpa? i'm also the 98th percentile and also consider my GPA to be mediocre.ughOSU wrote:WL via email. 98%ile LSAT and mediocre GPA.
Fuck law school.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jay115
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: UCLA?
I think Epstein applicants are going to have to wait longer than usual bc admissions decisions are made primarily by one person (dean schwartz) but Epstein scholar decisions are made by the Epstein program faculty, so I'm sure there's a lot more discussion involved.calgal17 wrote:msch0i wrote:Has anyone applied to the Epstein program and heard anything? (even an "application received" e-mail?)
No, I haven't heard anything for Epstein. Or anything since the regular app complete email for that matter...
-
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: UCLA?
+1 Dream SchoolVeritas wrote:UCLA, please accept me!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- michstudent10
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:49 pm
Re: UCLA?
Can you get into UCLA and not get into the Epstein program if you applied? I really want to go into Public Interest & I applied to the Epstein program but I really want UCLA regardless & I'm worried that applying to the program may have been risky with my numbers. My PS and my LORs all addressed my interest in PI so I just applied them to the Epstein program (i.e wrote down my original recommenders' names). Now I'm worried! Any thoughts?
- ruleser
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:41 am
Re: UCLA?
With people expressing sentiment like this, I wonder if there will be extra WL movement this year/lower matriculation...Space_Cowboy wrote:Congrats on Michigan. And second congrats on having the good sense to withdraw from UCLA. Now that in-state tuition is on par with private counterparts, (high CoL + limited job mobility + weak CA legal market) makes UCLA so not worth the risk for people with 170+s.Helmholtz wrote:I know you weren't asking me, but my GPA is a 3.45+ (LSAT's in profile).rw2264 wrote:what is your mediocre gpa? i'm also the 98th percentile and also consider my GPA to be mediocre.ughOSU wrote:WL via email. 98%ile LSAT and mediocre GPA.
Fuck law school.
- Hopefullawstudent
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:35 pm
Re: UCLA?
Sample size is a little low, but I share your optimism.ruleser wrote: With people expressing sentiment like this, I wonder if there will be extra WL movement this year/lower matriculation...
- ruleser
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:41 am
Re: UCLA?
Yes, you read my thinking...Hopefullawstudent wrote:Sample size is a little low, but I share your optimism.ruleser wrote: With people expressing sentiment like this, I wonder if there will be extra WL movement this year/lower matriculation...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UCLA?
CA economy blows. I wouldn't get my hopes up based on the rantings of a disgruntled splitter from California.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Sample size is a little low, but I share your optimism.ruleser wrote: With people expressing sentiment like this, I wonder if there will be extra WL movement this year/lower matriculation...
EDIT: Although, I have to say, with the projected tuition hikes and CoL, I'm not sure UCLA would have been a top choice even if my GPA didn't blow.
- msch0i
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:55 pm
Re: UCLA?
They have a completely separate admissions program, meaning the decisions are independent of each other. The only thing is that, if you're rejected from UCLA's general application pool but the Epstein adcom admits you, then you're in at UCLA.michstudent10 wrote:Can you get into UCLA and not get into the Epstein program if you applied? I really want to go into Public Interest & I applied to the Epstein program but I really want UCLA regardless & I'm worried that applying to the program may have been risky with my numbers. My PS and my LORs all addressed my interest in PI so I just applied them to the Epstein program (i.e wrote down my original recommenders' names). Now I'm worried! Any thoughts?
On another note...has anyone sent a LOCI yet? (I guess this is more for WLers..) I sent one via mail because it seems more formal than e-mail but don't know which method they actually prefer...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login