BC Law 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:03 pm

Veritas wrote:Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?


Veritas you're 12/8? Man 12/8's looking downright sexy right now!

smiley
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:05 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby smiley » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:04 pm

yeah let's not freak out too much, i was just wondering. we've seen ONE 12/7 get in, so let's not celebrate until we see a trend. i would love for it to be true though, as i'm a 12/7.

User avatar
GobiasIndustries
Posts: 358
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby GobiasIndustries » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:05 pm

dakatz wrote:
GobiasIndustries wrote:On behalf of the 12/11s, I am nervous.


I'm 12/11 and not particularly nervous at all. In fact, I feel pretty confident that it will be good news tomorrow. I'm 167, 3.5x URM, and I went to visit BC and chat with the admissions staff a few weeks ago. They made me feel even more confident in my chances given my numbers and circumstances. I feel like BU and BC are very similar with regard to rank, selectivity, etc. And I'm in at BU with a 75K scholarship, so logic would make me assume that I'd at least get into BC, even if its not with such a nice scholarship. So no, I don't think all 12/11's should be worried just by virtue of their decision date.


Good to hear it! I really don't think the decisions influence date completely, just adding fuel to our fire :P I'm 163/3.6x/URM so my fingers are crossed.

Here's to tomorrow being a huge day of acceptance packets!

User avatar
BC2010
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby BC2010 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:06 pm

Im in.

168 - 3.65 - 12/9 Status date - Permanent address is an hour away from BC

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:06 pm

I'm part of the group that thinks dates are relevant, and all the early status changes I believe are a positive sign. You guys all have amazing numbers and I'd be surprised if we weren't part of the first wave of acceptances. All of us according to TLS, LSN seem to have a very good chance of getting in. Best of luck on the rest of your cycle, I personally think BC's in the bag.

User avatar
Veritas
Posts: 2722
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Veritas » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:08 pm

killuminati wrote:
Veritas wrote:Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?


Veritas you're 12/8? Man 12/8's looking downright sexy right now!

are just making this stuff up?

autumn80
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby autumn80 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:08 pm

Veritas wrote:Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?


I was 12/8. No worries, I don't think the date means anything.

smiley
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:05 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby smiley » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:08 pm

killuminati wrote:I'm part of the group that thinks dates are relevant, and all the early status changes I believe are a positive sign. You guys all have amazing numbers and I'd be surprised if we weren't part of the first wave of acceptances. All of us according to TLS, LSN seem to have a very good chance of getting in. Best of luck on the rest of your cycle, I personally think BC's in the bag.


glad to hear you're confident, but i for one have an ugly lsat, so i'm not celebrating until a big letter comes.

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:09 pm

Veritas wrote:
killuminati wrote:
Veritas wrote:Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?


Veritas you're 12/8? Man 12/8's looking downright sexy right now!

are just making this stuff up?


? haha you have great numbers and you're in at BU already Veritas. I'm referring to the fact that early status changes so far have really strong numbers, and I don't think it's just a coincidence.

User avatar
Veritas
Posts: 2722
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Veritas » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:09 pm

autumn80 wrote:
Veritas wrote:Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?


I was 12/8. No worries, I don't think the date means anything.

great! we have similar stats too, I'll just be patient!

User avatar
Veritas
Posts: 2722
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Veritas » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:10 pm

killuminati wrote:
Veritas wrote:
killuminati wrote:
Veritas wrote:Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?


Veritas you're 12/8? Man 12/8's looking downright sexy right now!

are just making this stuff up?


? haha you have great numbers and you're in at BU already Veritas. I'm referring to the fact that early status changes so far have really strong numbers, and I don't think it's just a coincidence.

<3 your enthusiasm.

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:10 pm

Veritas wrote:
autumn80 wrote:
Veritas wrote:Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?


I was 12/8. No worries, I don't think the date means anything.

great! we have similar stats too, I'll just be patient!


haha when have we ever been patient? but brownie points for the effort!

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:11 pm

hmm no conspiracy theories about 12/9 yet. interesting.

chrisokc
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby chrisokc » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:12 pm

I have a feeling that the 12/7s are the group that BC feels will be the most physically attractive.

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:13 pm

chrisokc wrote:I have a feeling that the 12/7s are the group that BC feels will be the most physically attractive.


Yes! +1 Chris! We're bringing sexy back...YUP!

smiley
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:05 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby smiley » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:15 pm

now THAT is the truth.

chrisokc
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby chrisokc » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:15 pm

killuminati wrote:
chrisokc wrote:I have a feeling that the 12/7s are the group that BC feels will be the most physically attractive.


Yes! +1 Chris! We're bringing sexy back...YUP!

They may want us to get to Boston early so we can pose for the 2011 brochure.

User avatar
GobiasIndustries
Posts: 358
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby GobiasIndustries » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:16 pm

killuminati wrote:? haha you have great numbers and you're in at BU already Veritas. I'm referring to the fact that early status changes so far have really strong numbers, and I don't think it's just a coincidence.


None of us can obviously say what the date changes mean, but this could be correct. If the status changes actually correspond to when they entered your decision into the system, it makes sense that the ones they were most sure about (either accept or reject, to be fair) would get entered first. Maybe us 12/11s onward gave them more of a challenge?

However, this only makes sense if we believe that they made all their decisions in the week leading up to the 15th. It's much more likely that they made decisions since November and used this week to update their database.

So my point is that nothing makes sense and we have no idea what's going on. Or, at least, I don't. :P

LiveFree
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:14 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby LiveFree » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:17 pm

I'm 12/8 (163, 3.5 - pretty decent softs). I'm worried for the 12/8s as BC was a real reach for me. What do you guys think!?

acecrusher06
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:27 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby acecrusher06 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:17 pm

for those who were deferred, how big are the envelopes?

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:18 pm

GobiasIndustries wrote:
killuminati wrote:? haha you have great numbers and you're in at BU already Veritas. I'm referring to the fact that early status changes so far have really strong numbers, and I don't think it's just a coincidence.


None of us can obviously say what the date changes mean, but this could be correct. If the status changes actually correspond to when they entered your decision into the system, it makes sense that the ones they were most sure about (either accept or reject, to be fair) would get entered first. Maybe us 12/11s onward gave them more of a challenge?

However, this only makes sense if we believe that they made all their decisions in the week leading up to the 15th. It's much more likely that they made decisions since November and used this week to update their database.

So my point is that nothing makes sense and we have no idea what's going on. Or, at least, I don't. :P


haha I know, that's very true. But I'm trying to pull a Babe Ruth here...You know points to the outfield and then homerun. I can see the ball coming and I'm already envisioning all of us knocking it out of the park.

chrisokc
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby chrisokc » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:18 pm

GobiasIndustries wrote:
killuminati wrote:? haha you have great numbers and you're in at BU already Veritas. I'm referring to the fact that early status changes so far have really strong numbers, and I don't think it's just a coincidence.


None of us can obviously say what the date changes mean, but this could be correct. If the status changes actually correspond to when they entered your decision into the system, it makes sense that the ones they were most sure about (either accept or reject, to be fair) would get entered first. Maybe us 12/11s onward gave them more of a challenge?

However, this only makes sense if we believe that they made all their decisions in the week leading up to the 15th. It's much more likely that they made decisions since November and used this week to update their database.

So my point is that nothing makes sense and we have no idea what's going on. Or, at least, I don't. :P

I agree. When those status checkers change, "something" is happening. It ain't random. Whether it's good or bad is another story.

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:19 pm

the perfect anniversary date for decisions?


Image

LiveFree
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:14 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby LiveFree » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:20 pm

Has anyone gotten in with a 12/8 decision status date?

User avatar
Katerina
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:54 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Katerina » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:25 pm

chrisokc wrote:I have a feeling that the 12/7s are the group that BC feels will be the most physically attractive.


I dig it.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Christinabruin, Google Adsense [Bot], JazzyMac, jyzhao3, nahmjun and 10 guests