BC Law 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
DCLawGW
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:04 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby DCLawGW » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:15 pm

For those that have received letters, can you confirm whether it was sent to your permanent or present address?

User avatar
Katerina
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:54 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Katerina » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:15 pm

I'm in!!!

171, 3.2 (I was part of the 12/7 crowd for the weird status change).

Clair1331
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:23 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Clair1331 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:17 pm

DCLawGW wrote:For those that have received letters, can you confirm whether it was sent to your permanent or present address?


And what state that is? I might ask my husband to check before I get home from work if any one in NYC got a letter today.

tram988
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tram988 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:26 pm

Katerina wrote:I'm in!!!

171, 3.2 (I was part of the 12/7 crowd for the weird status change).

Hopefully thats a good sign-- Im 12/7 as well :)

Elysium09
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:19 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Elysium09 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:28 pm

Anyone with a 12/10 status update hear yet?

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:32 pm

tram988 wrote:
Katerina wrote:I'm in!!!

171, 3.2 (I was part of the 12/7 crowd for the weird status change).

Hopefully thats a good sign-- Im 12/7 as well :)



YEAH TRAM!!! 12/7'S ARE ACCEPTANCES!!!

chrisokc
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby chrisokc » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:38 pm

killuminati wrote:
tram988 wrote:
Katerina wrote:I'm in!!!

171, 3.2 (I was part of the 12/7 crowd for the weird status change).

Hopefully thats a good sign-- Im 12/7 as well :)



YEAH TRAM!!! 12/7'S ARE ACCEPTANCES!!!

I love the theory - 12/7 here.

chrisokc
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby chrisokc » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:40 pm

Tram, can you give an idea of your #s?

dakatz
Posts: 2460
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby dakatz » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:42 pm

Anyone with a 12/11 date get anything?

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:44 pm

chrisokc wrote:
killuminati wrote:
tram988 wrote:
Katerina wrote:I'm in!!!

171, 3.2 (I was part of the 12/7 crowd for the weird status change).

Hopefully thats a good sign-- Im 12/7 as well :)



YEAH TRAM!!! 12/7'S ARE ACCEPTANCES!!!

I love the theory - 12/7 here.


haha what's up chris! I'm all but guaranteeing it, but listen when we get to Boston...you 12/7's owe me a drink! make that 12 like my buddy finalaspects says...on the rocks.

deadlinguo
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:47 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby deadlinguo » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:47 pm

Anyone in California get their letter yet? Trying to figure out if I should make a trip to my permanent address today or not.

I'm 12/7 too and I really hope you guys are right lol

chrisokc
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby chrisokc » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:48 pm

YEAH TRAM!!! 12/7'S ARE ACCEPTANCES!!![/quote]
I love the theory - 12/7 here.[/quote]

haha what's up chris! I'm all but guaranteeing it, but listen when we get to Boston...you 12/7's owe me a drink! make that 12 like my buddy finalaspects says...on the rocks.[/quote]
That's a done deal.

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:50 pm

deadlinguo wrote:Anyone in California get their letter yet? Trying to figure out if I should make a trip to my permanent address today or not.

I'm 12/7 too and I really hope you guys are right lol


I'm 12/7 in Cali as well, I will let you know the minute my mail arrives! Oh wait...I have to teach at a learning center at 3pm...hmmm...after? =)

User avatar
utcris410
Posts: 469
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby utcris410 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:51 pm

tram988 wrote:
Katerina wrote:I'm in!!!

171, 3.2 (I was part of the 12/7 crowd for the weird status change).

Hopefully thats a good sign-- Im 12/7 as well :)

I don't think tram was saying they're in. . .correct me if I'm wrong.

chrisokc
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby chrisokc » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:52 pm

killuminati wrote:
deadlinguo wrote:Anyone in California get their letter yet? Trying to figure out if I should make a trip to my permanent address today or not.

I'm 12/7 too and I really hope you guys are right lol


I'm 12/7 in Cali as well, I will let you know the minute my mail arrives! Oh wait...I have to teach at a learning center at 3pm...hmmm...after? =)

I'll let you know when the mail hits big Oklahoma. I'll be sitting on top of my mailbox, as usual.

User avatar
JayTal
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:15 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby JayTal » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:53 pm

12/11 Here - Anyone hear anything yet?

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:54 pm

lol Chrisokc, this is going to be a great weekend. I'm really excited for the 12/7 group and their impressive numbers (excluding myself, I have a terrible gpa). I hope you're all rooting for BC when they play USC for a non-BCS bowl game lol...I love football.

haha i know utcris I was just saying, I'm pretty sure 12/7's are in, Tram just said it was a good sign.

User avatar
utcris410
Posts: 469
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby utcris410 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:55 pm

killuminati wrote:lol Chrisokc, this is going to be a great weekend. I'm really excited for the 12/7 group and their impressive numbers (excluding myself, I have a terrible gpa). I hope you're all rooting for BC when they play USC for a non-BCS bowl game lol...I love football.

haha i know utcris I was just saying, I'm pretty sure 12/7's are in, Tram just said it was a good sign.

sending good vibes.... 8)

User avatar
GobiasIndustries
Posts: 358
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby GobiasIndustries » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:57 pm

On behalf of the 12/11s, I am nervous.

Clair1331
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:23 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Clair1331 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:57 pm

GobiasIndustries wrote:On behalf of the 12/11s, I am nervous.


+1 and the 12/9's

dakatz
Posts: 2460
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby dakatz » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:59 pm

GobiasIndustries wrote:On behalf of the 12/11s, I am nervous.


I'm 12/11 and not particularly nervous at all. In fact, I feel pretty confident that it will be good news tomorrow. I'm 167, 3.5x URM, and I went to visit BC and chat with the admissions staff a few weeks ago. They made me feel even more confident in my chances given my numbers and circumstances. I feel like BU and BC are very similar with regard to rank, selectivity, etc. And I'm in at BU with a 75K scholarship, so logic would make me assume that I'd at least get into BC, even if its not with such a nice scholarship. So no, I don't think all 12/11's should be worried just by virtue of their decision date.

User avatar
mikcou
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:23 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby mikcou » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:01 pm

Clair1331 wrote:
GobiasIndustries wrote:On behalf of the 12/11s, I am nervous.


+1 and the 12/9's


I was a 12/9 and im now officially on hold. Id be surprised if the date has that much relevance, honestly.

User avatar
Veritas
Posts: 2722
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Veritas » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:02 pm

Just because I love hysteria, anything for 12/8?

killuminati
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby killuminati » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:02 pm

dakatz wrote:
GobiasIndustries wrote:On behalf of the 12/11s, I am nervous.


I'm 12/11 and not particularly nervous at all. In fact, I feel pretty confident that it will be good news tomorrow. I'm 167, 3.5x URM, and I went to visit BC and chat with the admissions staff a few weeks ago. They made me feel even more confident in my chances given my numbers and circumstances. I feel like BU and BC are very similar with regard to rank, selectivity, etc. And I'm in at BU with a 75K scholarship, so logic would make me assume that I'd at least get into BC, even if its not with such a nice scholarship. So no, I don't think all 12/11's should be worried just by virtue of their decision date.


I'm in at BU as well...BC's average income is 124K pretty much 125k and BU is 135K so it's pretty much the same. For it will come down to scholarships, you can check the stats of average income at princetonreview.com, as well as the other schools. Surprisingly UCLA and USC average income is 125k but cost of living here is MUCH CHEAPER...1800 for a 2 bedroom in boston WTF! Show me the $$$.

Lauren2255
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:33 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Lauren2255 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:02 pm

No mail in CT. But I am a 12/7 so I'm hoping for an acceptance tomorrow!!


(although I doubt the dates do have anything to do with the decisions).




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baby Gaga, Baidu [Spider], BastianPC, bleakchimera2, Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash, eageragnostic, fountainja, katthegreat11, Tennisgirl20, tlsfan13, trueblue92 and 27 guests