BC Law 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tommytahoe » Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:15 pm

I see. Oh, and, apropos of nothing, anybody have any idea why BC Law's student profile consists of a 59%-41% male-female distribution? Always wondered about that.

Ben2010
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Ben2010 » Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 pm

DR 4/20.

I'll try not to get too excited.

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tommytahoe » Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:12 pm

Do we have a general profile of the DR 04/20 folks?
I'm 163/3.80. I expect a WL at best.

darklighter13
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:01 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby darklighter13 » Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:15 pm

DR 4/19. 173/2.46.

Ben2010
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Ben2010 » Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:15 pm

tommytahoe wrote:Do we have a general profile of the DR 04/20 folks?
I'm 163/3.80. I expect a WL at best.


166/3.7. Median LSAT/>75th GPA, but it's so late in the cycle, I feel like it's going to have to be a WL.

User avatar
BC2010
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby BC2010 » Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:57 pm

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tommytahoe » Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:23 pm

pmomnie wrote:--ImageRemoved--

??

User avatar
NU_Jet55
Posts: 977
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:54 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby NU_Jet55 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:56 pm

tommytahoe wrote:Do we have a general profile of the DR 04/20 folks?
I'm 163/3.80. I expect a WL at best.


Rejected last week with a 164/3.9

missinglink
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:49 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby missinglink » Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:51 pm

I'd forgotten I applied to BC. It wasn't really on my radar anymore, but rejected via snail mail with 3.8 / 163.

User avatar
Not-A-Teabagger
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:01 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Not-A-Teabagger » Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:53 pm

missinglink wrote:I'd forgotten I applied to BC. It wasn't really on my radar anymore, but rejected via snail mail with 3.8 / 163.


If you don't mind my asking, when did your status checker change to DM? Was it this week?

missinglink
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:49 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby missinglink » Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:59 pm

Not-A-Teabagger wrote:
missinglink wrote:I'd forgotten I applied to BC. It wasn't really on my radar anymore, but rejected via snail mail with 3.8 / 163.


If you don't mind my asking, when did your status checker change to DM? Was it this week?

It says Decision Rendered 4/17/10. I didn't check the status checker until Monday, though, and I received the letter on Tuesday.

User avatar
tommytahoe
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tommytahoe » Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:38 pm

missinglink wrote:I'd forgotten I applied to BC. It wasn't really on my radar anymore, but rejected via snail mail with 3.8 / 163.

Those are my numbers exactly. I had a decision rendered 04/20, and today's mail (2 days later) has nothing in it. I am in Northern CA, however.
This late in the game, I expect a rejection, outside chance at WL.

lawschool82
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:12 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby lawschool82 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:33 pm

Hey guys,

Have any of you received an email thanking you for visiting the school? If so were you Accepted, Waitlisted, or rejected? I just received that email and I just went decision rendered a few days ago so I do not know my decision yet. Trying to figure out if it was sent to everyone or only sent to people accepted and/or waitlisted... Thanks!

User avatar
nowinGA
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:06 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby nowinGA » Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:31 pm

lawschool82 wrote:Hey guys,

Have any of you received an email thanking you for visiting the school? If so were you Accepted, Waitlisted, or rejected? I just received that email and I just went decision rendered a few days ago so I do not know my decision yet. Trying to figure out if it was sent to everyone or only sent to people accepted and/or waitlisted... Thanks!


Well, did you visit the school?? ;)

I got it...and I was accepted...so, good luck!

sullidop
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sullidop » Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:35 pm

nowinGA wrote:
lawschool82 wrote:Hey guys,

Have any of you received an email thanking you for visiting the school? If so were you Accepted, Waitlisted, or rejected? I just received that email and I just went decision rendered a few days ago so I do not know my decision yet. Trying to figure out if it was sent to everyone or only sent to people accepted and/or waitlisted... Thanks!


Well, did you visit the school?? ;)

I got it...and I was accepted...so, good luck!


The woman who coordinates the visits sends them out to everyone. But in your case I'm sure it means that you're in.

lawschool82
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:12 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby lawschool82 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:31 pm

sullidop wrote:
nowinGA wrote:
lawschool82 wrote:Hey guys,

Have any of you received an email thanking you for visiting the school? If so were you Accepted, Waitlisted, or rejected? I just received that email and I just went decision rendered a few days ago so I do not know my decision yet. Trying to figure out if it was sent to everyone or only sent to people accepted and/or waitlisted... Thanks!


Well, did you visit the school?? ;)

I got it...and I was accepted...so, good luck!


The woman who coordinates the visits sends them out to everyone. But in your case I'm sure it means that you're in.


Alright I am trying not to get my hopes up too much! But yes I visited a few weeks ago. So my (wishful) thinking was that they held off on sending out that email until I was accepted. I went DR on the 18th so maybe tomorrow is the big day

Ben2010
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Ben2010 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:39 pm

DM 4/20. 166/3.7. Rejected.

:cry:

sullidop
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sullidop » Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:55 pm

Ben2010 wrote:DM 4/20. 166/3.7. Rejected.

:cry:


Damn that's surprising. Good thing I applied last cycle.

User avatar
Gymnast0206
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:16 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Gymnast0206 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:28 pm

DR 4/23 . . . we'll see what that letter says.

User avatar
gatorlion
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:23 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby gatorlion » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:00 pm

DR 4/18 = Rejection via snail mail

autoding
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:51 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby autoding » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:26 pm

Gymnast0206 wrote:DR 4/23 . . . we'll see what that letter says.




I'm DR 4/23 as well.........expecting another ding.

lawschool82
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:12 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby lawschool82 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:57 pm

gatorlion wrote:DR 4/18 = Rejection via snail mail


o no! I am sorry.

Do you know if they send out notices in "batches?"

ie. are all DR 4/18 rejections?!

ms.ballerina
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby ms.ballerina » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:35 pm

DM 4/20: Waitlist 164/3.3

User avatar
kalede
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:59 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby kalede » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:12 pm

DR 4/20 and I got the rejection letter yesterday. :( 3.4/166

southernlaw
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby southernlaw » Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:20 pm

for those wait listed, I just received a confirmation email regarding the wait list form - one that I sent in nearly a month ago.

Similar experiences, anyone?




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: canafsa, cocozhang9950, finaciardi, Google Adsense [Bot], rikkebukh and 5 guests