BC Law 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
jbarl1
Posts: 563
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:40 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby jbarl1 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:25 pm

tram988 wrote:
jbarl1 wrote:
lawyerlover wrote:has anyone who was DR 1/11 or 1/12 received there letter/package yet?


I went DR on 1/12 and received my letter today. I live in central NY state.


IN??


No I was rejected.

tram988
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tram988 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:27 pm

jbarl1 wrote:
tram988 wrote:
jbarl1 wrote:
lawyerlover wrote:has anyone who was DR 1/11 or 1/12 received there letter/package yet?


I went DR on 1/12 and received my letter today. I live in central NY state.


IN??


No I was rejected.


Sorry I thought you were someone new! My bad asking twice lol

User avatar
Matypete
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Matypete » Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:47 pm

IN at BC 3.84/163

tram988
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tram988 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:51 pm

Matypete wrote:IN at BC 3.84/163

Yesss a fellow 163er!!

ecohen14
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:55 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby ecohen14 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:51 pm

when did you go complete?

User avatar
Matypete
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Matypete » Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:11 pm

ecohen14 wrote:when did you go complete?


Current Status: Your application has been completed.
Current Status Date: 11/16/2009
Decision Status: Decision Rendered
Decision Status Date: 1/12/2010

User avatar
Katerina
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:54 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Katerina » Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 pm

Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?

User avatar
GobiasIndustries
Posts: 358
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby GobiasIndustries » Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:18 pm

Katerina wrote:Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?


I was wondering the same thing. I know they consider everyone throughout the cycle and send you info when they've decided, but I have no sense of timeframe.

sand87632
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:25 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sand87632 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:20 pm

Katerina wrote:Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?


No! I wish...it would make my decision much easier if I knew. I called them and asked about it and they said merit awards are usually offered in January.

Geist13
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby Geist13 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:58 pm

Rejected. 167/3.09. Wasn't expecting to get in, but still sucks.

User avatar
BC2010
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby BC2010 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:05 pm

Katerina wrote:Has anyone received any scholarship information yet?


I haven't. Has anyone filled out the forms on needaccess.org? I've heard BC gives out a lot more need based money then merit, anyone else heard anything to this extent?

doopwooper
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:15 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby doopwooper » Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:55 am

Waitlisted...

167/3.9

I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.

moonmaster3
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:56 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby moonmaster3 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:01 am

doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...

167/3.9

I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.


Holy shit dude....how is that possible?

User avatar
sirchristaylor
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:33 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sirchristaylor » Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:44 am

In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

law_lover
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 12:02 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby law_lover » Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:25 am

sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Congrats!!!

User avatar
sirchristaylor
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:33 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sirchristaylor » Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:43 am

law_lover wrote:
sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Congrats!!!


Thanks!

sand87632
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:25 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sand87632 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:06 pm

doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...

167/3.9

I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.


Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!

MissLucky
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby MissLucky » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:16 pm

sand87632 wrote:
doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...

167/3.9

I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.


Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!


it's a clear YP i believe

dakatz
Posts: 2460
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby dakatz » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:19 pm

MissLucky wrote:
sand87632 wrote:
doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...

167/3.9

I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.


Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!


it's a clear YP i believe


His numbers aren't high enough to be YP. I know people with numbers right around his, and higher who got in. I think people on here rely a bit too heavily on numbers. Obviously numbers are important, but schools get too many high-numbers applicants to accept every single one. Inevitably they need to reject some people who are boring applicants, have application typos, come off as arrogant in the PS, don't have any extracurricular experience, didn't challenge themselves in school, etc. Don't be so amazed when someone with numbers above the medians gets rejected, because he could be guilty of any of the above, or any number of different things that could get a high-number applicant rejected.

tram988
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tram988 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:54 pm

dakatz wrote:
MissLucky wrote:
sand87632 wrote:
doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...

167/3.9

I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.


Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!


it's a clear YP i believe


His numbers aren't high enough to be YP. I know people with numbers right around his, and higher who got in. I think people on here rely a bit too heavily on numbers. Obviously numbers are important, but schools get too many high-numbers applicants to accept every single one. Inevitably they need to reject some people who are boring applicants, have application typos, come off as arrogant in the PS, don't have any extracurricular experience, didn't challenge themselves in school, etc. Don't be so amazed when someone with numbers above the medians gets rejected, because he could be guilty of any of the above, or any number of different things that could get a high-number applicant rejected.


+1,000,000

sand87632
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:25 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sand87632 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:30 pm

dakatz wrote:
MissLucky wrote:
sand87632 wrote:
doopwooper wrote:Waitlisted...

167/3.9

I'm a little surprised by this... I'm probably going to withdraw.


Whoa dude, that is crazy. Did you get your app in late? Do you think there was some major typos or grammatical errors. That is very odd. So sorry!


it's a clear YP i believe


His numbers aren't high enough to be YP. I know people with numbers right around his, and higher who got in. I think people on here rely a bit too heavily on numbers. Obviously numbers are important, but schools get too many high-numbers applicants to accept every single one. Inevitably they need to reject some people who are boring applicants, have application typos, come off as arrogant in the PS, don't have any extracurricular experience, didn't challenge themselves in school, etc. Don't be so amazed when someone with numbers above the medians gets rejected, because he could be guilty of any of the above, or any number of different things that could get a high-number applicant rejected.



What do you think it was doopwooper?

User avatar
sayruss11
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:47 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby sayruss11 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:59 pm

sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You give me hope!
161/3.92 and still waiting...

ExcitedBlutterance
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:11 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby ExcitedBlutterance » Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:50 pm

sayruss11 wrote:
sirchristaylor wrote:In with a 161, 3.95, non URM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You give me hope!
161/3.92 and still waiting...


What is your avatar?

User avatar
TWoodWil
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:19 am

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby TWoodWil » Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:57 pm

REJECTED

At best I was expected a WL, so it's no big loss. Plus, for me it was one of those "Well that's nice" not a heart-set-on-it school.

tram988
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm

Re: BC Law 2010

Postby tram988 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:09 pm

TWoodWil wrote:REJECTED

At best I was expected a WL, so it's no big loss. Plus, for me it was one of those "Well that's nice" not a heart-set-on-it school.

wow #'s?? Sorry man




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Houzy and 6 guests