i think everyone forgets that 50% of people fall below any law school's median, and it's quite the assumption that all the numbers below the 50% line are splitters. i just happened to hear earlier from a bunch of schools than most people with my numbers.Burger in a can wrote:Looking at your acceptance record and you numbers, I'd be surprised if you didn't.jay115 wrote:
in at BC! jeez, i wish i had political connections...
BC Law 2010 Forum
- jay115
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I didn't mean to insult you, or suggest that you don't deserve your acceptances. I was just taking a cheap shot at you. Sorry!jay115 wrote:i think everyone forgets that 50% of people fall below any law school's median, and it's quite the assumption that all the numbers below the 50% line are splitters. i just happened to hear earlier from a bunch of schools than most people with my numbers.Burger in a can wrote:Looking at your acceptance record and you numbers, I'd be surprised if you didn't.jay115 wrote:
in at BC! jeez, i wish i had political connections...
- lateforthesky16
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:05 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
i thought you already got in ED at UCLA?jay115 wrote: in at BC! jeez, i wish i had political connections...
- jay115
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
yeah - i will formally withdraw from all other schools once i receive written confirmation of my acceptance via snail maillateforthesky16 wrote:i thought you already got in ED at UCLA?jay115 wrote: in at BC! jeez, i wish i had political connections...
- BC2010
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Great point, and I guess I was really only thinking in that context...BUT then again who reads forums on TLS that doesn't really want BIGLaw?MissLucky wrote:I feel like this applies to BIGLaw only...no?
One could and many do. But I dont.danidancer wrote:One could also argue that Vandy, UCLA, and to an extent Texas, are "national" as well...
Unfortunately I think this is the case. But sometimes one needs to ask oneself..."Do I really want to watch baseball in a dome for the rest of my life?"FreddyBigShot wrote:All kidding aside, from what I've read in other forums the 3Ls at Minny have a brighter future (at least in the shirt-term) than their counterparts at BC.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
pmomnie wrote:Great point, and I guess I was really only thinking in that context...BUT then again who reads forums on TLS that doesn't really want BIGLaw?MissLucky wrote:I feel like this applies to BIGLaw only...no?
<<<<<< This guy.
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 6:44 pm
- Cupidity
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I want to clerk for the USSC. Too bad I'm not going to yale
- Hopefullawstudent
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:35 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
At Yale they call it SCOTUS.Cupidity wrote:I want to clerk for the USSC. Too bad I'm not going to yale
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: BC Law 2010
pmomnie wrote:Great point, and I guess I was really only thinking in that context...BUT then again who reads forums on TLS that doesn't really want BIGLaw?MissLucky wrote:I feel like this applies to BIGLaw only...no?
Me.
-
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
hahaha me too.kalvano wrote:pmomnie wrote:Great point, and I guess I was really only thinking in that context...BUT then again who reads forums on TLS that doesn't really want BIGLaw?MissLucky wrote:I feel like this applies to BIGLaw only...no?
Me.
- bonnieblue
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:56 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
rejected 166 3.5...ouch i wasn't expecting that
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Yikes! Sorry to hear that. They are really, REALLY hard to predict this cycle, eh?bonnieblue wrote:rejected 166 3.5...ouch i wasn't expecting that
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: BC Law 2010
bonnieblue wrote:rejected 166 3.5...ouch i wasn't expecting that
Wow, that's usually WL territory at worst.
They are being quite odd this cycle.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:14 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
rejected 172 3.25...bonnieblue wrote:rejected 166 3.5...ouch i wasn't expecting that
- Kiersten1985
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I would say YP with that one.jess86 wrote:rejected 172 3.25...bonnieblue wrote:rejected 166 3.5...ouch i wasn't expecting that
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I thought YP necessitated a waitlist?Kiersten1985 wrote:I would say YP with that one.jess86 wrote:rejected 172 3.25...bonnieblue wrote:rejected 166 3.5...ouch i wasn't expecting that
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:06 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
In!
158/3.84. Vietnamese female, decent softs and recs
158/3.84. Vietnamese female, decent softs and recs
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:19 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Has BC started accepting non-EA applicants yet?
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Yeah a ding is not YP.Burger in a can wrote:I thought YP necessitated a waitlist?Kiersten1985 wrote:I would say YP with that one.jess86 wrote:rejected 172 3.25...bonnieblue wrote:rejected 166 3.5...ouch i wasn't expecting that
-
- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
First post? HMM. BC hasnt accepted many 158's! You should be proud.I_love_mopeds wrote:In!
158/3.84. Vietnamese female, decent softs and recs
BTW I dont think they have begun accepting non-EA's. I think moped is a flame.
IF in fact this isnt a flame then congrats!!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:06 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I applied EA but I was studying abroad in London this semester. Just arrived home (Texas) to find the BC envelope waiting for me..it was sent on Dec 15th.
-
- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Then congrats! Is BC a top choice?I_love_mopeds wrote:I applied EA but I was studying abroad in London this semester. Just arrived home (Texas) to find the BC envelope waiting for me..it was sent on Dec 15th.
-
- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
anyone check this site out? http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index. ... Accept/avg It seemed pretty interesting.
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Yeah, that's where I got all the numbers for my "lowest-rated law schools" thread that everyone wanted to kill me for starting. So be careful with that site.tram988 wrote:anyone check this site out? http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index. ... Accept/avg It seemed pretty interesting.
P.S. There are a lot of unexpected results for that column! Rutgers-Camden has a higher selectivity rate than NYU, Duke, and Fordham! That makes me feel special! And UConn is WAY up there too. They were listed on Princeton Review's 'hardest schools to get in to' list, and that must be why!
Last edited by Burger in a can on Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login