Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
It had to be done...
This thread is the new home for those of us that sport a 3.75+ GPA and an LSAT score from 164 down.
Discuss school lists, splitter-like questions, acceptances/rejections, etc.
It's OK to be a reverse-splitter on TLS. You belong, too. I promise.
This thread is the new home for those of us that sport a 3.75+ GPA and an LSAT score from 164 down.
Discuss school lists, splitter-like questions, acceptances/rejections, etc.
It's OK to be a reverse-splitter on TLS. You belong, too. I promise.
Last edited by ViP on Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:18 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
158/3.75
I'm going nowhere.
I'm going nowhere.
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
But you found your way to this thread and it's your new home, so you have that going for you.Mparty7441 wrote:158/3.75
I'm going nowhere.
Really, though.
You're fine. You have a shot at plenty of first tier schools... The only reason you should be depressed is if you were initially banking on a T14.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:18 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I wasn't, so I'm ok. I'm not really worried. I'm a NYSter, so I'd be pretty content going to Buffalo which I'm a shoe-in for.ViP wrote:But you found your way to this thread and it's your new home, so you have that going for you.Mparty7441 wrote:158/3.75
I'm going nowhere.
Really, though.
You're fine. You have a shot at plenty of first tier schools... The only reason you should be depressed is if you were initially banking on a T14.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:42 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- panadera
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:36 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I don't fit in any splitter category. I'm not 170+ or below 164. Sad day for being left out!
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Haha I was thinking about that...kpd-m wrote:I don't fit in any splitter category. I'm not 170+ or below 164. Sad day for being left out!
All I know is that a 165+ can't possibly qualify as a low score, unless you're applying T10.
If you have a 165+ and a relatively low GPA (<3.2 or so), you should definitely have a place in the traditional splitters thread.
Then again, there are plenty of applicants that aren't splitters at all.
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
That is mean...ViP wrote:But you found your way to this thread and it's your new home, so you have that going for you.Mparty7441 wrote:158/3.75
I'm going nowhere.
Really, though.
You're fine. You have a shot at plenty of first tier schools... The only reason you should be depressed is if you were initially banking on a T14.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:34 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I'm 3.97/161
Not sure if I'm retaking in Dec. or not. Thinking about just applying with this score, so I'm interested to see where people in the same position are looking.
Not sure if I'm retaking in Dec. or not. Thinking about just applying with this score, so I'm interested to see where people in the same position are looking.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:18 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I actually didn't take it as mean at all. lol. I was expecting someone to say "don't waste your money and your life on law if you don't have a 170." So I was happy to see a half sarcastic response along with a serious response attached. (I expect the next poster in this thread to say that however)Miracle wrote:That is mean...ViP wrote:But you found your way to this thread and it's your new home, so you have that going for you.Mparty7441 wrote:158/3.75
I'm going nowhere.
Really, though.
You're fine. You have a shot at plenty of first tier schools... The only reason you should be depressed is if you were initially banking on a T14.
- nickc8
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:32 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I belong here!
3.89/157
Hopefully I can get into a Tier 1...but I don't feel too confident at this point.
3.89/157
Hopefully I can get into a Tier 1...but I don't feel too confident at this point.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:23 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I'm 3.94/161. Pretty much expecting to be in waitlist city for a while.
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
In what universeMiracle wrote:That is mean...ViP wrote:But you found your way to this thread and it's your new home, so you have that going for you.Mparty7441 wrote:158/3.75
I'm going nowhere.
Really, though.
You're fine. You have a shot at plenty of first tier schools... The only reason you should be depressed is if you were initially banking on a T14.
I didn't intend to be mean at all... I'm trying to make light of the situation and show the poster that he/she should have some confidence and optimism.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:48 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
LSAT 161 GPA 3.76
Planning to apply to
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Iowa
William Mitchell
St. Thomas
Hamline
American
perhaps: BU or BC
Probably looking to stay in midwest, think i'll throw in American and BU or BC though just for the heck of it. My number 1 choice is Minnesota but would be fairly happy with Wisconsin or Iowa.
Planning to apply to
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Iowa
William Mitchell
St. Thomas
Hamline
American
perhaps: BU or BC
Probably looking to stay in midwest, think i'll throw in American and BU or BC though just for the heck of it. My number 1 choice is Minnesota but would be fairly happy with Wisconsin or Iowa.
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
With that monster of a GPA, you shouldn't lose hope on the first tier.nickc8 wrote:I belong here!
3.89/157
Hopefully I can get into a Tier 1...but I don't feel too confident at this point.
Of course, a 157 is low by Tier-1 standards, but you're undoubtedly an anomaly with that T14 GPA.
As long as you're somewhat realistic with your expectations, your cycle may happily surprise you.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:18 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Don't worry man. I got ya.ViP wrote:In what universeMiracle wrote:That is mean...ViP wrote:But you found your way to this thread and it's your new home, so you have that going for you.Mparty7441 wrote:158/3.75
I'm going nowhere.
Really, though.
You're fine. You have a shot at plenty of first tier schools... The only reason you should be depressed is if you were initially banking on a T14.
I didn't intend to be mean at all... I'm trying to make light of the situation and show the poster that he/she should have some confidence and optimism.
- nucklm05
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:42 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
3.92/165, so I technically don't meet your criteria, but I am facing the same issues as the rest of you are.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- nickc8
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:32 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Thanks. I plan to blanket schools between 30-50 range and see what I have to work with.ViP wrote:With that monster of a GPA, you shouldn't lose hope on the first tier.nickc8 wrote:I belong here!
3.89/157
Hopefully I can get into a Tier 1...but I don't feel too confident at this point.
Of course, a 157 is low by Tier-1 standards, but you're undoubtedly an anomaly with that T14 GPA.
As long as you're somewhat realistic with your expectations, your cycle may happily surprise you.
When I put my numbers in LSP, I get nearly all "Considers" in that range...so I'm keeping my fingers crossed!
Are you applying anywhere else in T14? Seems like you have a shot at a few.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:00 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Yep I belong in here too! 160/3.88.
Because of my lower than expected LSAT I'm in the process of building a new list of schools to apply to. The ones I'm hoping for now are SMU, George Mason, UNC, and American maybe? I'm still looking. I just hope I'm not overestimating my chances. Where are you guys looking?
Because of my lower than expected LSAT I'm in the process of building a new list of schools to apply to. The ones I'm hoping for now are SMU, George Mason, UNC, and American maybe? I'm still looking. I just hope I'm not overestimating my chances. Where are you guys looking?
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
nickc8 wrote:Thanks. I plan to blanket schools between 30-50 range and see what I have to work with.ViP wrote:With that monster of a GPA, you shouldn't lose hope on the first tier.nickc8 wrote:I belong here!
3.89/157
Hopefully I can get into a Tier 1...but I don't feel too confident at this point.
Of course, a 157 is low by Tier-1 standards, but you're undoubtedly an anomaly with that T14 GPA.
As long as you're somewhat realistic with your expectations, your cycle may happily surprise you.
When I put my numbers in LSP, I get nearly all "Considers" in that range...so I'm keeping my fingers crossed!
Are you applying anywhere else in T14? Seems like you have a shot at a few.
Last edited by ViP on Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:18 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I'm applying to a load of schools. I was gonna apply to 10, but I've gotten a lot of waivers so after tomorrow I'll be at 16. You can check me out on LSN, same name as here.ConnArk wrote:Yep I belong in here too! 160/3.88.
Because of my lower than expected LSAT I'm in the process of building a new list of schools to apply to. The ones I'm hoping for now are SMU, George Mason, UNC, and American maybe? I'm still looking. I just hope I'm not overestimating my chances. Where are you guys looking?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:50 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
deleted
Last edited by jmhallah on Fri Feb 10, 2017 2:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Your numbers are fine. That GPA will take you farther than you think.jmhallah wrote:3.9 / 158
depressed.. hoping to get into Indiana-Bloomington as I'm an Indiana resident..
I actually like your chances at Bloomington. LSAT is above the 25th %, and your GPA is above the 75th %.
Make sure you apply EARLY, take your PS seriously, and look to write "optional" essays that express your personal interest in the school.
-
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:43 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
.
Last edited by hellokitty on Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:51 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I wish I were in your shoes.
LSAT ....you can retake...but you can't redo your undergrad..
my undergrad GPA is TRAGIC i tell you..TRAGIC...
LSAT ....you can retake...but you can't redo your undergrad..
my undergrad GPA is TRAGIC i tell you..TRAGIC...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login