Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread Forum
- fidesverita
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
So far it looks like regular splitters are doing pretty well with the T10 (high lsat, low GPAs).
Hopefully there's good news for us reverse splitters after the holidays...
Hopefully there's good news for us reverse splitters after the holidays...
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:55 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Hopefully. What do you think of Davis / Hastings?nickc8 wrote:I wouldn't worry...it would be odd if you didn't get into Santa Clara. Best of luck with your cycle!azukibeanlove wrote:Oh wow, I almost have the same stats as you - 3.89/158nickc8 wrote:3.89/157
So far...
In at: UCincy, Santa Clara, and McGeorge
Held for further review at: Ohio State (first choice)
Rejected at: Illinois
I haven't heard back from Santa Clara though. :/
- nickc8
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:32 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I didn't even bother with Hastings. If you are a URM, you might stand a chance there. Davis is a crapshoot...I'm not expecting much, but maybe a waitlist. I think, for us, it comes down to our softs/personal statement to differentiate from the crowd.azukibeanlove wrote:
Hopefully. What do you think of Davis / Hastings?
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:55 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Yeah I'm not a URM but I did apply to LEOP. Ugh Davis is pissing me off because I submitted my application on Nov. 6, but it's STILL awaiting evaluation. WTF?!nickc8 wrote:I didn't even bother with Hastings. If you are a URM, you might stand a chance there. Davis is a crapshoot...I'm not expecting much, but maybe a waitlist. I think, for us, it comes down to our softs/personal statement to differentiate from the crowd.azukibeanlove wrote:
Hopefully. What do you think of Davis / Hastings?
- 1armedscissor
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
3.9 / 163 / strong softs (prestigious natl scholarship)
In at Penn RD
Good luck guys
In at Penn RD
Good luck guys
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:15 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
158/ 3.77
In at George Mason- RD full time
was not expecting this at all
In at George Mason- RD full time
was not expecting this at all
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:05 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
163/3.84.
So far my big acceptances have been Illinois, Iowa, Ohio State, and Wisconsin. Rejected at GULC, waitlisted at Notre Dame and Virginia (actually excited that I was even waitlisted there).
So far my big acceptances have been Illinois, Iowa, Ohio State, and Wisconsin. Rejected at GULC, waitlisted at Notre Dame and Virginia (actually excited that I was even waitlisted there).
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:16 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
159/3.74 with unusual, but not necessarily strong, softs. I'm very happy about being accepted to Minnesota and Iowa. When I posted my naive "What are my chances?" thread, a few folks told me to not bother with even with T1. Anyhow, good luck to all my fellow high GPA splitters.
- Cosmo Kramer
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:11 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
starchinkilt wrote:3.71/158 here
applying to buffalo, maine, and penn st.
you can ride in my boat if you want (3.70/158) applying to pitt, temple, fordham, IU, etc. Anyone else thinking about a retake in February after applying this cycle?
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:18 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
158/3.75
Accepted:
Buffalo w/$$
Cincy (Don't know about $$)
Quinnipiac (Don't know about $$)
Rejected:
Illinois
On hold:
Iowa
Accepted:
Buffalo w/$$
Cincy (Don't know about $$)
Quinnipiac (Don't know about $$)
Rejected:
Illinois
On hold:
Iowa
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Wow - wish I had found this site earlier. I've really got a substantial reverse splitter problem. 3.9 from a top 10 school with an MA, 3 years of work experience, great recs, but a 155 on the LSAT. I do have a history of standardized tests not predicting my success in school all along which I have included in an addendum. Just to confirm my suspicions, do I have a chance at Tulane or UMD? Does anyone have any success stories with being a real reverse splitter and a non-URM that still frequents these boards?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:19 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
155/166 3.8
IN
minnesota $
BU
Northwestern ED
Go reverse splitters!
IN
minnesota $
BU
Northwestern ED
Go reverse splitters!
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:00 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Glad I found my home, I'm a 3.8//157.
I put in my apps to a scattering of a couple of T30s (ha not holding my breath), a bunch between 50-100, and a couple safeties. Hopefully I'll hear back before too long.
I put in my apps to a scattering of a couple of T30s (ha not holding my breath), a bunch between 50-100, and a couple safeties. Hopefully I'll hear back before too long.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MBZags
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:21 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
3.88/163/(December score?)
In at:
Cincinnati with $$
Washington & Lee
And I'm waiting on a bunch of schools.
In at:
Cincinnati with $$
Washington & Lee
And I'm waiting on a bunch of schools.
- chango
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Hello, comrades.
157/3.95
Kinda crazy, because I was in the top 5% for SAT and GRE. I really didn't expect a 157. Had my heart set on USC, but oh well. Can always transfer out after my first year if my grades are good enough and my heart is still set.
And to preempt, I don't want to retake. If I put law school off a year, I'll chicken out.
Have to stay in SoCal, so that really only leaves me Loyola and Southwestern. (Pepperdine and Chapman aren't exactly the best environments for a gay man).
Loyola would be great (I think), and I'm starting to warm to Southwestern.
157/3.95
Kinda crazy, because I was in the top 5% for SAT and GRE. I really didn't expect a 157. Had my heart set on USC, but oh well. Can always transfer out after my first year if my grades are good enough and my heart is still set.
And to preempt, I don't want to retake. If I put law school off a year, I'll chicken out.
Have to stay in SoCal, so that really only leaves me Loyola and Southwestern. (Pepperdine and Chapman aren't exactly the best environments for a gay man).
Loyola would be great (I think), and I'm starting to warm to Southwestern.
Last edited by chango on Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:44 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
chango wrote:Hello, comrades.
157/3.95
Kinda crazy, because I was in the top 5% for SAT and GRE. I really didn't expect a 157. Had my heart set on USC, but oh well. Can always transfer out after my first year if my grades are good enough and my heart is still set.
And to preempt, I don't want to retake. If I put law school off a year, I'll chicken out.
Have to stay in SoCal, so that really only leaves me Loyola and Southwestern. (Pepperdine and Chapman aren't exactly the best environments for a gay man).
Loyola would be great (I think), and I'm starting to warm to Southwestern.
Loyola >>>>>Southwestern Be smart about this.
- chango
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
care to elucidate?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:21 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I chose Chapman with a full ride over Loyola with a decent scholarship, and I would do it again, but it depends on what you're looking for. I wasn't aiming for biglaw and want to work in Orange County, so it made sense. Plus I just felt like Chapman was a better fit, which is more important than 0L's tend to think.savesthedayajb wrote:Loyola >>>>>Southwestern Be smart about this.chango wrote:Hello, comrades.
157/3.95
Kinda crazy, because I was in the top 5% for SAT and GRE. I really didn't expect a 157. Had my heart set on USC, but oh well. Can always transfer out after my first year if my grades are good enough and my heart is still set.
And to preempt, I don't want to retake. If I put law school off a year, I'll chicken out.
Have to stay in SoCal, so that really only leaves me Loyola and Southwestern. (Pepperdine and Chapman aren't exactly the best environments for a gay man).
Loyola would be great (I think), and I'm starting to warm to Southwestern.
As for Chapman not being a good environment for a gay man, I'm curious what makes you think that. While Dean Eastman is conservative, I wouldn't call it a conservative school. Both the students and faculty are pretty well distributed across the political spectrum.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Splitter too..so glad I'm not the only one!
3.8/157 Funny how one test means more than 3 years of work.
In at U of Kentucky as an out of state resident, so if you consider top 100 as T1, then there is hope for everyone.
3.8/157 Funny how one test means more than 3 years of work.
In at U of Kentucky as an out of state resident, so if you consider top 100 as T1, then there is hope for everyone.
- chango
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Well, for one thing, http://www.lsac.org/SpecialInterests/lgbt-chart.aspJOE! wrote:I chose Chapman with a full ride over Loyola with a decent scholarship, and I would do it again, but it depends on what you're looking for. I wasn't aiming for biglaw and want to work in Orange County, so it made sense. Plus I just felt like Chapman was a better fit, which is more important than 0L's tend to think.savesthedayajb wrote:Loyola >>>>>Southwestern Be smart about this.chango wrote:Hello, comrades.
157/3.95
Kinda crazy, because I was in the top 5% for SAT and GRE. I really didn't expect a 157. Had my heart set on USC, but oh well. Can always transfer out after my first year if my grades are good enough and my heart is still set.
And to preempt, I don't want to retake. If I put law school off a year, I'll chicken out.
Have to stay in SoCal, so that really only leaves me Loyola and Southwestern. (Pepperdine and Chapman aren't exactly the best environments for a gay man).
Loyola would be great (I think), and I'm starting to warm to Southwestern.
As for Chapman not being a good environment for a gay man, I'm curious what makes you think that. While Dean Eastman is conservative, I wouldn't call it a conservative school. Both the students and faculty are pretty well distributed across the political spectrum.
One out of five is pretty abysmal.
I'm curious, do you know any LGBT students at Chapman, Joe?
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:21 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Hmm... LSAC's information is definitely incorrect. I don't know about LGBT faculty and administration, but there definitely is an LGBT student organization called Outlaw: http://www.chapman.edu/law/students/outlaw/. I do know a couple LGBT students
There's also at least 1 LGBT specific course. You can browse the course descriptions here: http://www.chapman.edu/law/programs/courses.asp. The only course that seems directly LGBT specific is Sexuality, Gender Identification, and the Law, although some other courses probably address the same issues (like Law and Social Sciences).
I'm biased in pushing Chapman, but I'd urge you to contact someone from Outlaw; they could probably address your concerns a lot more specifically. Or feel free to PM me with any questions.
There's also at least 1 LGBT specific course. You can browse the course descriptions here: http://www.chapman.edu/law/programs/courses.asp. The only course that seems directly LGBT specific is Sexuality, Gender Identification, and the Law, although some other courses probably address the same issues (like Law and Social Sciences).
I'm biased in pushing Chapman, but I'd urge you to contact someone from Outlaw; they could probably address your concerns a lot more specifically. Or feel free to PM me with any questions.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:19 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
what do you think the threshold is on the lsat here for the splitting? i have 3.84/167 and based on the medians it looks like a split. any experience with those stats out there? i'm asian/haupa so i am not getting any URM traction either.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:34 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
3.97/161, In at the University of MN!
It can happen, everyone told me it was quite the long-shot!
It can happen, everyone told me it was quite the long-shot!
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Your numbers should be competitive for Cornell, Michigan, and Northwestern (with WE).pinkhearts wrote:what do you think the threshold is on the lsat here for the splitting? i have 3.84/167 and based on the medians it looks like a split. any experience with those stats out there? i'm asian/haupa so i am not getting any URM traction either.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:55 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Hey everyone,
My numbers are 3.9/158 - not an impressive LSAT score, but got into UC Hastings on Jan. 7th (yes, I'm that person on LSN). I remember someone telling me to not bother with Hastings or Davis with my score, but I applied anyway - I have nothing to lose, right? I applied to Hastings' LEOP, but I got in through first cycle without LEOP, meaning that LSAT SCORE ISN'T EVERYTHING, AND GPA DOES COUNT. So to all my fellow reverse splitters - have faith!! Our hard work will pay off
Good luck to everyone's cycles!
My numbers are 3.9/158 - not an impressive LSAT score, but got into UC Hastings on Jan. 7th (yes, I'm that person on LSN). I remember someone telling me to not bother with Hastings or Davis with my score, but I applied anyway - I have nothing to lose, right? I applied to Hastings' LEOP, but I got in through first cycle without LEOP, meaning that LSAT SCORE ISN'T EVERYTHING, AND GPA DOES COUNT. So to all my fellow reverse splitters - have faith!! Our hard work will pay off
Good luck to everyone's cycles!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login