Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Advice to everyone in this thread:
Retake.
Retake.
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I'm heeding your advice... 3.89/164, retaking in December.whymeohgodno wrote:Advice to everyone in this thread:
Retake.
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:16 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Generally sound advice, but be aware that a tiny increase of one point may not outweigh the disadvantage of having a late review of your application.atresia wrote:I'm heeding your advice... 3.89/164, retaking in December.whymeohgodno wrote:Advice to everyone in this thread:
Retake.
- queenlizzie13
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:30 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
If I'm not happy with my cycle, I will be retaking again in June...JOThompson wrote:Generally sound advice, but be aware that a tiny increase of one point may not outweigh the disadvantage of having a late review of your application.atresia wrote:I'm heeding your advice... 3.89/164, retaking in December.whymeohgodno wrote:Advice to everyone in this thread:
Retake.
That way applications will be reviewed early once again. Otherwise, if I get into places I really want to go then I will be going next fall. If not, I will wait one more year and hope I rock the LSAT (3rd time's the charm maybe?)
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:39 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Just wanted to stop by and say helloooooo It's taken me many months to let go of the fact that my LSAT is not what I planned on... and I don't think I'm totally over it yet. It's been over a year now! Let's all support each other <3
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
True, but I'm going to raise my score past 165 for sure. I fucked up a LG that held me back from a 168. If I improve a little on everything, 170 is in play.JOThompson wrote:Generally sound advice, but be aware that a tiny increase of one point may not outweigh the disadvantage of having a late review of your application.
-
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I'm checking in, 4.01/162.
If I'm not satisfied with this cycle, I'll be re-taking in June and wondering what to do with myself for a year while I wait. Get into *really* good shape, I guess. Lots of pilates and spinning time...
If I'm not satisfied with this cycle, I'll be re-taking in June and wondering what to do with myself for a year while I wait. Get into *really* good shape, I guess. Lots of pilates and spinning time...
- swimmergirl1303
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:26 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Have faith! I was worried about the same thing but I'm already into a T15. Just be patient! Some schools give us reverse splitters more credit (esp with challenging course load/academic institution/good softs!)Aggiegrad2011 wrote:I'm checking in, 4.01/162.
If I'm not satisfied with this cycle, I'll be re-taking in June and wondering what to do with myself for a year while I wait. Get into *really* good shape, I guess. Lots of pilates and spinning time...
- queenlizzie13
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:30 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Swimmergirl, since you got into UT at Austin, may I ask what undergraduate institution you attended, and what major you were?swimmergirl1303 wrote:Have faith! I was worried about the same thing but I'm already into a T15. Just be patient! Some schools give us reverse splitters more credit (esp with challenging course load/academic institution/good softs!)Aggiegrad2011 wrote:I'm checking in, 4.01/162.
If I'm not satisfied with this cycle, I'll be re-taking in June and wondering what to do with myself for a year while I wait. Get into *really* good shape, I guess. Lots of pilates and spinning time...
- treeborn
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 8:16 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
This is my plan. 3.9/163. Applying at reaches in the T14, and will retake in June if my cycle isn't acceptable to me.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:I'm checking in, 4.01/162.
If I'm not satisfied with this cycle, I'll be re-taking in June and wondering what to do with myself for a year while I wait. Get into *really* good shape, I guess. Lots of pilates and spinning time...
- LawLucy
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:02 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
+1ViP wrote:It had to be done...
This thread is the new home for those of us that sport a 3.75+ GPA and an LSAT score from 164 down.
Discuss school lists, splitter-like questions, acceptances/rejections, etc.
It's OK to be a reverse-splitter on TLS. You belong, too. I promise.
oh the pain of it all....
- LawLucy
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:02 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
aulburch wrote:Ummm, no. Thanks for looking at my numbers and not thinking that I'm qualified to go to Penn based on my own merits. I'm so tired of everyone on TLS thinking it's impossible to go a top law school with one blemish on your academic record. For a 23 year old, I've done quite a few things in and outside of the classroom that more than justify going to Penn (fundraising over $4 million in DC, working for an investment bank and private equity group for 2 years, helping found a start-up company to assist NGOs, scoring a pre-law school state judicial clerkship, graduating MCL/PBK from a Top 5 school). It just goes to show that you shouldn't be discouraged from applying to schools because of the opinion of others. If you know you have the ability to excel and a record that demonstrates it, apply wherever you deem fit.aPosseAdEsse wrote:aulburch wrote:3.9 / 158 / 2 years WE as an investment banker and state judicial clerk
In:
UPenn (WL Accepted, 7/01)
George Washington (WL Accepted, May)
William and Mary
Out:
NYU
Cornell
USC
UCLA
Emory
WL:
Yale (Rejected)
Columbia (Rejected)
UVA (Withdrew)
Duke (Rejected)
Georgetown (Rejected)
Vanderbilt (Withdrew)
Notre Dame (Withdrew)
Washington and Lee (Withdrew)
I'm looking at your numbers and feeling a tad confused. You were accepted at Penn, and waitlisted at Yale and Columbia with a 158? Simply out of curiousity, are you a URM?
FYI: People with LSATs as low as 152 got into Yale last year. Regardless of race, those people were qualified to attend the top law school in the country.
Enjoy the online rat race. I'm resting up before 1L.
Dear GOD that was well said. Thank you.
- swimmergirl1303
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:26 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Sure thing. I'll PM you!queenlizzie13 wrote:Swimmergirl, since you got into UT at Austin, may I ask what undergraduate institution you attended, and what major you were?swimmergirl1303 wrote:Have faith! I was worried about the same thing but I'm already into a T15. Just be patient! Some schools give us reverse splitters more credit (esp with challenging course load/academic institution/good softs!)Aggiegrad2011 wrote:I'm checking in, 4.01/162.
If I'm not satisfied with this cycle, I'll be re-taking in June and wondering what to do with myself for a year while I wait. Get into *really* good shape, I guess. Lots of pilates and spinning time...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- queenlizzie13
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:30 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Just got into American today - 161/3.88...Nice to have a first acceptance in the bank.
-
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
- Spinozist21
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:23 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Again, I am not sure if I count as a reverse splitter or what I count as.
158, 3.5LSAC GPA (although I wrote an addendum that my GPA should be considered 3.7 as that would be what it was without one bad semester the semester after I transferred schools).
I have applied/plan to apply:
Wisconsin
Iowa
American
Pittsburgh, ED
Penn State--accepted
Villanova
Case
Ohio State
I would really like to apply to some others, but I just do not see how I can get into a top 20...although academically I think I match up well, I just suck at standardized tests.
158, 3.5LSAC GPA (although I wrote an addendum that my GPA should be considered 3.7 as that would be what it was without one bad semester the semester after I transferred schools).
I have applied/plan to apply:
Wisconsin
Iowa
American
Pittsburgh, ED
Penn State--accepted
Villanova
Case
Ohio State
I would really like to apply to some others, but I just do not see how I can get into a top 20...although academically I think I match up well, I just suck at standardized tests.
- Spinozist21
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:23 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
I had considered applying to UIC, but I just didn't see how a 158 would make the cut.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
It's called being a URM lololol.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
- Spinozist21
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:23 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
Well, that seems like an incorrect generalization.whymeohgodno wrote:It's called being a URM lololol.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
- DeeCee
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
3.95 UGPA, 4.0 GGPA, 157, applied to:
American
GW
GTown
UNC
Pace (I want to do enviro law)
Northeastern--fee waiver
UMaryland--fee waiver
UVA--fee waiver
Cornell--fee waiver
Penn--fee waiver
UMichigan--fee waiver
Let me emphasize that I do not count on getting in most of the schools I have fee waivers to.....though it's worth knowing where you stand for $12 a piece. I pretty much have no idea where I'll get in to so we'll see what happens!
American
GW
GTown
UNC
Pace (I want to do enviro law)
Northeastern--fee waiver
UMaryland--fee waiver
UVA--fee waiver
Cornell--fee waiver
Penn--fee waiver
UMichigan--fee waiver
Let me emphasize that I do not count on getting in most of the schools I have fee waivers to.....though it's worth knowing where you stand for $12 a piece. I pretty much have no idea where I'll get in to so we'll see what happens!
-
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
You should apply even now. Go check out the thread w/ Dean Pless...Spinozist21 wrote:I had considered applying to UIC, but I just didn't see how a 158 would make the cut.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
It'll only cost you $12, and you might make the cut, you have no idea.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:16 am
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
The school takes a few reverse splitters. I was on the waitlist as a 159/3.74/non-URM. Before the trolls arrive to crucify me, let me point out that getting waitlisted is different than having a real shot at admission. Still, I'd encourage you to try.Spinozist21 wrote:I had considered applying to UIC, but I just didn't see how a 158 would make the cut.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
No, it's pretty correct, actually (barring hyper-amazing softs on par with curing cancer).Spinozist21 wrote:Well, that seems like an incorrect generalization.whymeohgodno wrote:It's called being a URM lololol.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
- jwrash
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
+1HeavenWood wrote:No, it's pretty correct, actually (barring hyper-amazing softs on par with curing cancer).Spinozist21 wrote:Well, that seems like an incorrect generalization.whymeohgodno wrote:It's called being a URM lololol.Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Congrats Lizzie... I'm still waiting! Grr...
And re: Low LSAT scores... Indeed, Dean Pless at UIC even stated that last year, they accepted scores as low as 147 (albeit not many of them).
I must, however, disagree with your assumption that any soft is "on par" with curing cancer.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Reverse-Splitters Unite! - The 2010 Reverse-Splitter Thread
What about curing AIDs or solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?jwrash wrote:I must, however, disagree with your assumption that any soft is "on par" with curing cancer.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login