Page 94 of 137

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:36 pm
by CardinalRules
tomhobbes wrote:FWIW I actually believe Herb about his acceptance and kind of look forward to meeting him. Even though he made fun of me for having a 4.0 when he apparently has one too.
I'm getting a little worried about you, Tommy. :wink:

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:37 pm
by lawyering
CardinalRules wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:FWIW I actually believe Herb about his acceptance and kind of look forward to meeting him. Even though he made fun of me for having a 4.0 when he apparently has one too.
I'm getting a little worried about you, Tommy. :wink:

tomhobbes = herb's alter ego?

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:40 pm
by crackberry
Goddamn you, Herb. I am normally so sure about these things, but I really can't decide if you're real or not. I'm definitely leaning one way, but I'm really not sure.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:46 pm
by CardinalRules
crackberry wrote:Goddamn you, Herb. I am normally so sure about these things, but I really can't decide if you're real or not. I'm definitely leaning one way, but I'm really not sure.
You mean that he's so obviously a troll that he might not be a troll because a troll would never make himself so obvious?

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:50 pm
by crackberry
CardinalRules wrote:
crackberry wrote:Goddamn you, Herb. I am normally so sure about these things, but I really can't decide if you're real or not. I'm definitely leaning one way, but I'm really not sure.
You mean that he's so obviously a troll that he might not be a troll because a troll would never make himself so obvious?
Yeah, something like that.

Also, why pick today to say that he got into Yale. And why create the (fake?) profile today?

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:52 pm
by CardinalRules
crackberry wrote:
CardinalRules wrote:
crackberry wrote:Goddamn you, Herb. I am normally so sure about these things, but I really can't decide if you're real or not. I'm definitely leaning one way, but I'm really not sure.
You mean that he's so obviously a troll that he might not be a troll because a troll would never make himself so obvious?
Yeah, something like that.

Also, why pick today to say that he got into Yale. And why create the (fake?) profile today?
He probably got bored with his current form of trolling and noticed their Twitter update. Now he can reap the rewards of trolling as an admit rather than trolling as an applicant.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:54 pm
by BioEBear2010
tomhobbes wrote:FWIW I actually believe Herb about his acceptance and kind of look forward to meeting him. Even though he made fun of me for having a 4.0 when he apparently has one too.
I tentatively believe him, too. Then again, there's no point speculating. Perhaps we'll meet him at the ASW?

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:55 pm
by crackberry
CardinalRules wrote:He probably got bored with his current form of trolling and noticed their Twitter update. Now he can reap the rewards of trolling as an admit rather than trolling as an applicant.
If he were a "normal" troll, his profile would have said like 164, 3.7 or something, but his stats are definitely Yale-worthy. So he's not an anti-AA troll. I dunno.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:55 pm
by tomhobbes
BioEBear2010 wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:FWIW I actually believe Herb about his acceptance and kind of look forward to meeting him. Even though he made fun of me for having a 4.0 when he apparently has one too.
I tentatively believe him, too. Then again, there's no point speculating. Perhaps we'll meet him at the ASW?
I will be on the lookout for acerbic Mexican males.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:56 pm
by Kretzy
crackberry wrote:
CardinalRules wrote:He probably got bored with his current form of trolling and noticed their Twitter update. Now he can reap the rewards of trolling as an admit rather than trolling as an applicant.
If he were a "normal" troll, his profile would have said like 164, 3.7 or something, but his stats are definitely Yale-worthy. So he's not an anti-AA troll. I dunno.
His stats have changed (at least) 3 times since he joined. Originally he had a 4.1, 161 from Tulsa, this morning a 4.0 from HYS and was mexican, now a 4.0, 172, and data about other schools. C'mon y'all.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:57 pm
by BioEBear2010
tomhobbes wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:FWIW I actually believe Herb about his acceptance and kind of look forward to meeting him. Even though he made fun of me for having a 4.0 when he apparently has one too.
I tentatively believe him, too. Then again, there's no point speculating. Perhaps we'll meet him at the ASW?
I will be on the lookout for acerbic Mexican males.
Similarly, I will keep an eye out for deceased philosophers who have cheated on their wives.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:57 pm
by crackberry
tomhobbes wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:FWIW I actually believe Herb about his acceptance and kind of look forward to meeting him. Even though he made fun of me for having a 4.0 when he apparently has one too.
I tentatively believe him, too. Then again, there's no point speculating. Perhaps we'll meet him at the ASW?
I will be on the lookout for acerbic Mexican males.
Hey tom, will you please come to Stanford ASW? I'm interested to see if you could pick me out of a crowd.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:58 pm
by crackberry
Kretzy wrote:
crackberry wrote:
CardinalRules wrote:He probably got bored with his current form of trolling and noticed their Twitter update. Now he can reap the rewards of trolling as an admit rather than trolling as an applicant.
If he were a "normal" troll, his profile would have said like 164, 3.7 or something, but his stats are definitely Yale-worthy. So he's not an anti-AA troll. I dunno.
His stats have changed (at least) 3 times since he joined. Originally he had a 4.1, 161 from Tulsa, this morning a 4.0 from HYS and was mexican, now a 4.0, 172. C'mon y'all.
Oh right I forgot the Tulsa thing. Ok, you're right, he's a troll.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:58 pm
by BioEBear2010
Kretzy wrote:
crackberry wrote:
CardinalRules wrote:He probably got bored with his current form of trolling and noticed their Twitter update. Now he can reap the rewards of trolling as an admit rather than trolling as an applicant.
If he were a "normal" troll, his profile would have said like 164, 3.7 or something, but his stats are definitely Yale-worthy. So he's not an anti-AA troll. I dunno.
His stats have changed (at least) 3 times since he joined. Originally he had a 4.1, 161 from Tulsa, this morning a 4.0 from HYS and was mexican, now a 4.0, 172. C'mon y'all.
That is easily explained by a transfer, subsequent GPA decrease, and LSAT retake. Why so skeptical, Kretzy?

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:59 pm
by Kretzy
BioEBear2010 wrote:
Kretzy wrote:
crackberry wrote:
CardinalRules wrote:He probably got bored with his current form of trolling and noticed their Twitter update. Now he can reap the rewards of trolling as an admit rather than trolling as an applicant.
If he were a "normal" troll, his profile would have said like 164, 3.7 or something, but his stats are definitely Yale-worthy. So he's not an anti-AA troll. I dunno.
His stats have changed (at least) 3 times since he joined. Originally he had a 4.1, 161 from Tulsa, this morning a 4.0 from HYS and was mexican, now a 4.0, 172. C'mon y'all.
That is easily explained by a transfer, subsequent GPA decrease, and LSAT retake. Why so skeptical, Kretzy?
:D it's the sneaky gay in me, according to Sue Sylvester.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:01 pm
by tomhobbes
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:FWIW I actually believe Herb about his acceptance and kind of look forward to meeting him. Even though he made fun of me for having a 4.0 when he apparently has one too.
I tentatively believe him, too. Then again, there's no point speculating. Perhaps we'll meet him at the ASW?
I will be on the lookout for acerbic Mexican males.
Hey tom, will you please come to Stanford ASW? I'm interested to see if you could pick me out of a crowd.
I kind of wish I could go to Stanford's ASW, but I just don't think I should take the time off from school to do it, especially since I'm so sure about Yale. If I were trying to ID you, I'd just head towards the Stanford-UG guy who was most loudly singing Stanford's praises. Or maybe I'd be more subtle and diss Stanford to draw you out.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:02 pm
by BioEBear2010
Kretzy wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote: That is easily explained by a transfer, subsequent GPA decrease, and LSAT retake. Why so skeptical, Kretzy?
:D it's the sneaky gay in me, according to Sue Sylvester.
Oh snaps I love Jane Lynch!
crackberry wrote: Hey tom, will you please come to Stanford ASW? I'm interested to see if you could pick me out of a crowd.
Hey Crack, would it be in poor taste to come fully adorned in Cal gear?

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:02 pm
by owhlcn
the amount i look forward to reading this thread every day is becoming a little embarrassing.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:08 pm
by Herb Watchfell
Yo, I just got off the phone with Barbara Brangi of Admissions and she told me that some "Pat Barnes" lady should have my financial aid award finalized within the coming weeks. Have any of you received your package yet?

PS I updated my profile today to reflect my actual gpa/lsat/undergrad. I figured I should out myself now that YLS has let me in. Hopefully they won't change their minds!

I look forward to meeting you all!

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:09 pm
by tomhobbes
.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:11 pm
by crackberry
tomhobbes wrote:I kind of wish I could go to Stanford's ASW, but I just don't think I should take the time off from school to do it, especially since I'm so sure about Yale. If I were trying to ID you, I'd just head towards the Stanford-UG guy who was most loudly singing Stanford's praises. Or maybe I'd be more subtle and diss Stanford to draw you out.
The latter would definitely work better than the former, but I'd like to think I can blend in with a crowd if necessary. There are a few people on here (BioE and Kretzy most notably) who will know who I am for various reasons, but other than them, I wonder how well I could keep myself hidden.
BioEBear2010 wrote:Hey Crack, would it be in poor taste to come fully adorned in Cal gear?
Do it. I dare you.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:13 pm
by crackberry
Could Herb have grabbed those names off the website, or did those of you who were actually admitted get such calls as well?

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:14 pm
by Kretzy
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I kind of wish I could go to Stanford's ASW, but I just don't think I should take the time off from school to do it, especially since I'm so sure about Yale. If I were trying to ID you, I'd just head towards the Stanford-UG guy who was most loudly singing Stanford's praises. Or maybe I'd be more subtle and diss Stanford to draw you out.
The latter would definitely work better than the former, but I'd like to think I can blend in with a crowd if necessary. There are a few people on here (BioE and Kretzy most notably) who will know who I am for various reasons, but other than them, I wonder how well I could keep myself hidden.
BioEBear2010 wrote:Hey Crack, would it be in poor taste to come fully adorned in Cal gear?
Do it. I dare you.
Sometimes I wish I'd be able to stay hidden come SLS next year :)

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:17 pm
by CardinalRules
crackberry wrote:Could Herb have grabbed those names off the website, or did those of you who were actually admitted get such calls as well?
Hmm, I am actually starting to believe him in spite of myself. He's got Barbara's name right, and I don't think that it's on their website.

Re: Yale 2010

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:18 pm
by CardinalRules
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I kind of wish I could go to Stanford's ASW, but I just don't think I should take the time off from school to do it, especially since I'm so sure about Yale. If I were trying to ID you, I'd just head towards the Stanford-UG guy who was most loudly singing Stanford's praises. Or maybe I'd be more subtle and diss Stanford to draw you out.
The latter would definitely work better than the former, but I'd like to think I can blend in with a crowd if necessary. There are a few people on here (BioE and Kretzy most notably) who will know who I am for various reasons, but other than them, I wonder how well I could keep myself hidden.
I think that I would know who you are.