Yale 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
Dignan
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Dignan » Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:46 pm

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:67-43. At least it was close.

True. That was in your house too, huh?


When was the last time Stanford was ranked in the top five in football, again? *begin battle of recent obscurity*

Edit: I should also add that if our players weren't rapists, we'd probably still be perennially far better than Stanford.

In the category of Sports Nobody Cares About (which is an important category for Stanford supporters, since Stanford does well in such sports), CU is the only school, besides Stanford, that has a legitimate claim to best overall cross country program over the past ten years. Stanford dominated cross country in the 1990s for men and women, but CU arguably deserves to be considered the best over the past decade.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:49 pm

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:67-43. At least it was close.

True. That was in your house too, huh?


When was the last time Stanford was ranked in the top five in football, again? *begin battle of recent obscurity*

Edit: I should also add that if our players weren't rapists, we'd probably still be perennially far better than Stanford.

I dunno, we were ranked in the top 10 in 2001 when we went to the Seattle Bowl and we went to the Rose Bowl in the 98-99 season, so we were probably pretty highly ranked then.

User avatar
adameus
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am

Re: Yale 2010

Postby adameus » Tue Mar 16, 2010 6:32 pm

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:67-43. At least it was close.

True. That was in your house too, huh?


When was the last time Stanford was ranked in the top five in football, again? *begin battle of recent obscurity*

Edit: I should also add that if our players weren't rapists, we'd probably still be perennially far better than Stanford.

I dunno, we were ranked in the top 10 in 2001 when we went to the Seattle Bowl and we went to the Rose Bowl in the 98-99 season, so we were probably pretty highly ranked then.


top 10 and went to the seattle bowl?

User avatar
Lmao Zedong
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Lmao Zedong » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:29 pm

BioEBear2010 wrote:But yes, Vasquez is a beast. I have Maryland in the Sweet-16


which maryland gets to if everything goes by seed. it's not bold to put a team where their seed is expected to take them. i mean, i'm not big on maryland at all and i still have them in the sweet sixteen. bold would be to put them into the elite eight over kansas

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:33 pm

Lmao Zedong wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:But yes, Vasquez is a beast. I have Maryland in the Sweet-16


which maryland gets to if everything goes by seed. it's not bold to put a team where their seed is expected to take them. i mean, i'm not big on maryland at all and i still have them in the sweet sixteen. bold would be to put them into the elite eight over kansas

Bold isn't quite the right word here...I'm thinking more ludicrous.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27945
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:47 pm

Dude, Michigan State isn't going to lose to Maryland. Kalin Lucas is every bit the college superstar that Vasquez is.

User avatar
Pausanias
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Pausanias » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:50 pm

BioEBear2010 wrote:
Lmao Zedong wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:But yes, Vasquez is a beast. I have Maryland in the Sweet-16


which maryland gets to if everything goes by seed. it's not bold to put a team where their seed is expected to take them. i mean, i'm not big on maryland at all and i still have them in the sweet sixteen. bold would be to put them into the elite eight over kansas

Bold isn't quite the right word here...I'm thinking more ludicrous.



Greivis is taking the Terps to the final four, book it! Bold enough for ya?

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:54 pm

omgggggg

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:54 pm

Pausanias wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
Lmao Zedong wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:But yes, Vasquez is a beast. I have Maryland in the Sweet-16


which maryland gets to if everything goes by seed. it's not bold to put a team where their seed is expected to take them. i mean, i'm not big on maryland at all and i still have them in the sweet sixteen. bold would be to put them into the elite eight over kansas

Bold isn't quite the right word here...I'm thinking more ludicrous.



Greivis is taking the Terps to the final four, book it! Bold enough for ya?

LUDICROUS

ConMan345 wrote:omgggggg

IN?!?!?!

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:57 pm

ConMan345 wrote:omgggggg

Seriously, in?!

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:58 pm

adameus wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:When was the last time Stanford was ranked in the top five in football, again?

I dunno, we were ranked in the top 10 in 2001 when we went to the Seattle Bowl and we went to the Rose Bowl in the 98-99 season, so we were probably pretty highly ranked then.


top 10 and went to the seattle bowl?

I don't know if we were Top 10 at the end of the season (or at the end of the regular season) but we were definitely as high as No. 9 in the country that year. And I think we were third in the Pac-10. Back in those days, third in the Pac-10 = Seattle Bowl.

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:58 pm

lol, NO, sorry to scare you, I was bemoaning all of the sports talk :P

However, if I do get in, my Bat signal will be thus: "OMGGGGGGGGGG"

User avatar
Dignan
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Dignan » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:00 pm

crackberry wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:omgggggg

Seriously, in?!

I similarly misinterpreted ConMan's post.

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:00 pm

crackberry wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:omgggggg

Seriously, in?!


See edit below :mrgreen:

In any event, you're all wrong: Pitt over 'Cuse and into the Final Four, and OSU beats Kansas in the Elite Eight as well. SD State, Siena and UTEP win at least a game.
Last edited by Kretzy on Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:01 pm

ConMan345 wrote:lol, NO, sorry to scare you, I was bemoaning all of the sports talk :P

However, if I do get in, my Bat signal will be thus: "OMGGGGGGGGGG"

Damn. In that case, I hope Gotham is attacked soon so that you can join us :D

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:02 pm

Edit above: Sorry, I thought we were in the Stanford post...I forgot we only talk about this shit in the Yale thread. My beezy :oops:

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:03 pm

BioEBear2010 wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:lol, NO, sorry to scare you, I was bemoaning all of the sports talk :P

However, if I do get in, my Bat signal will be thus: "OMGGGGGGGGGG"

Damn. In that case, I hope Gotham is attacked soon so that you can join us :D


ME. TOO.

Also, I'm not sure what Kretzy has been smokin...

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:04 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:lol, NO, sorry to scare you, I was bemoaning all of the sports talk :P

However, if I do get in, my Bat signal will be thus: "OMGGGGGGGGGG"

Damn. In that case, I hope Gotham is attacked soon so that you can join us :D


ME. TOO.

Also, I'm not sure what Kretzy has been smokin...


Mid-afternoon whiskey tastings do something to the mind...

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:05 pm

Kretzy wrote:In any event, you're all wrong: Pitt over 'Cuse and into the Final Four, and OSU beats Kansas in the Elite Eight as well. SD State, Siena and UTEP win at least a game.

Similarly rooting for Siena. Also hoping that Cornell can pull an upset and Richmond can make it pretty far (spiders!).

Rock Chalk wins it all, though. Them or Cal :D

User avatar
Dignan
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Dignan » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:06 pm

Kretzy wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:lol, NO, sorry to scare you, I was bemoaning all of the sports talk :P

However, if I do get in, my Bat signal will be thus: "OMGGGGGGGGGG"

Damn. In that case, I hope Gotham is attacked soon so that you can join us :D


ME. TOO.

Also, I'm not sure what Kretzy has been smokin...


Mid-afternoon whiskey tastings do something to the mind...

You're into whisky, Kretzy? What are you drinking this afternoon?

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:07 pm

Kretzy wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:lol, NO, sorry to scare you, I was bemoaning all of the sports talk :P

However, if I do get in, my Bat signal will be thus: "OMGGGGGGGGGG"

Damn. In that case, I hope Gotham is attacked soon so that you can join us :D


ME. TOO.

Also, I'm not sure what Kretzy has been smokin...


Mid-afternoon whiskey tastings do something to the mind...


Hmm, "whiskey tasting," is that what the kids are calling it these days? Whatever happened to "binge drinking"?

User avatar
Dignan
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Dignan » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:08 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
Hmm, "whiskey tasting," is that what the kids are calling it these days? Whatever happened to "binge drinking"?

Regular "binge drinking" of fine whiskey would set you back more than law school tuition.

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:10 pm

Dignan wrote:
Kretzy wrote:Mid-afternoon whiskey tastings do something to the mind...

You're into whisky, Kretzy? What are you drinking this afternoon?


Absolutely. WhiskeyGuy and I have tentative plans to start a whiskey group at SLS next year. Right now, Stranahan's 10 year (from here in CO), though I was doing a small-batch bourbon tasting today: Eagle Rare, Buffalo Trace, Booker's etc. in their special batches. Good stuff.

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:10 pm

Dignan wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:
Hmm, "whiskey tasting," is that what the kids are calling it these days? Whatever happened to "binge drinking"?

Regular "binge drinking" of fine whiskey would set you back more than law school tuition.


I'm a tequila man myself. My boss has broken out the Don Julio 1942 to celebrate some case victories. Oh, oh so good. It's like honey.

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:11 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
Hmm, "whiskey tasting," is that what the kids are calling it these days? Whatever happened to "binge drinking"?


I prefer to think of myself as a "professional drinker."




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Christinabruin, hwwong and 5 guests