Yale 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
Dignan
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Dignan » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:01 pm

Lmao Zedong wrote:am i the only one who thinks that yale's tweets really are not particularly clever or amusing / seem to be trying too hard to be witty and cool
?

I don't know if you're the only one, but I happen to find them clever and amusing. I'm pretty lame, though.

User avatar
tomhobbes
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby tomhobbes » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:02 pm

I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:08 pm

tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.

User avatar
tomhobbes
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby tomhobbes » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:10 pm

crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.


Well, to be fair, if you're going to accuse me of being biased towards Yale because I was admitted, you might as well say that I'm biased towards every school.

User avatar
Lmao Zedong
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Lmao Zedong » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:15 pm

crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.


ahaha

i suspect everyone ITT is too intimidated by the mystique that TLS seems to have constructed around asha and thus they can't bring themselves to utter any words of blasphemy. if you do, she'll get you, man. if you've read harry potter, you'll know that an azkaban dementor pales in comparison to asha's prowess

personally, i have no vested interest encouraging me to slurp on asha's nuts, and just wanted to say that i find this thread's dynamics far more amusing than any of yale's tweets

MichelledeMontaigne
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:11 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby MichelledeMontaigne » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:17 pm

Lmao Zedong wrote:
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.


ahaha

i suspect everyone ITT is too intimidated by the mystique that TLS seems to have constructed around asha and thus they can't bring themselves to utter any words of blasphemy. if you do, she'll get you, man. if you've read harry potter, you'll know that an azkaban dementor pales in comparison to asha's prowess

personally, i have no vested interest encouraging me to slurp on asha's nuts, and just wanted to say that i like the dynamic i think i'm observing ITT


Hahahaha...Love it.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28191
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:27 pm

crackberry wrote:
notanumber wrote:
Kronk wrote:
notanumber wrote:(But seriously, Stanford is an awesome school)


Beta move.


I don't share your talents, Kronk.

To be fair, Kronk isn't half the man you are.


tbf, if crackberry didn't attend Stanford for UG he'd be stuck on a waitlist at UIUC.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:51 pm

Kronk wrote:tbf, if crackberry didn't attend Stanford for UG he'd be stuck on a waitlist at UIUC.

You hit me where it hurts every time.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:54 pm

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:tbf, if crackberry didn't attend Stanford for UG he'd be stuck on a waitlist at UIUC.

You hit me where it hurts every time.


He's actually complimenting your alma mater, you know, if it makes such an enormous difference in your cycle.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:05 pm

CardinalRules wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:tbf, if crackberry didn't attend Stanford for UG he'd be stuck on a waitlist at UIUC.

You hit me where it hurts every time.


He's actually complimenting your alma mater, you know, if it makes such an enormous difference in your cycle.

Well, no, he's saying I wouldn't have gotten into SLS if I hadn't gone to Stanford UG (which is true). That said, I still would've gone to Berkeley ahead of Chicago, so his point is accurate, but his assumptions are deeply flawed.

User avatar
zabagabe
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 3:48 am

Re: Yale 2010

Postby zabagabe » Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:33 am

tomhobbes wrote:
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.


Well, to be fair, if you're going to accuse me of being biased towards Yale because I was admitted, you might as well say that I'm biased towards every school.


Haha, quote of the cycle...

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:39 am

zabagabe wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.


Well, to be fair, if you're going to accuse me of being biased towards Yale because I was admitted, you might as well say that I'm biased towards every school.


Haha, quote of the cycle...

Lawyered?

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:45 am

tomhobbes wrote:
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.


Well, to be fair, if you're going to accuse me of being biased towards Yale because I was admitted, you might as well say that I'm biased towards every school.


+1. Why don't we rank our biases, TH? :lol:

User avatar
GeePee
Posts: 1273
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby GeePee » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:49 am

CardinalRules wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:
crackberry wrote:
tomhobbes wrote:I vastly prefer them to "we are making calls again today." Yes, they are trying to be witty and cool, and I think they're succeeding. It does differentiate them from the cold professionalism of other law schools.

No bias.


Well, to be fair, if you're going to accuse me of being biased towards Yale because I was admitted, you might as well say that I'm biased towards every school.


+1. Why don't we rank our biases, TH? :lol:

You could just pick a school. I think that would do quite nicely.

In other news, I'm expecting some sort of negative news in the near future. Looking forward to some commiseration.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:01 pm

Well, (203) brought no good news to TLS yesterday. I wonder when we'll see the first bad news from 06520 trickle in.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28191
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:06 pm

crackberry wrote:Well, (203) brought no good news to TLS yesterday. I wonder when we'll see the first bad news from 06520 trickle in.


I hope 06520 stays away from San Francisco and Boulder.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:12 pm

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Well, (203) brought no good news to TLS yesterday. I wonder when we'll see the first bad news from 06520 trickle in.


I hope 06520 stays away from San Francisco and Boulder.

Wow, was that you actually showing some solidarity with me?!

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28191
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:19 pm

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Well, (203) brought no good news to TLS yesterday. I wonder when we'll see the first bad news from 06520 trickle in.


I hope 06520 stays away from San Francisco and Boulder.

Wow, was that you actually showing some solidarity with me?!


Eh, I go for the groins when you start the fight but in general I think you're OKAY, I guess.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:22 pm

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Well, (203) brought no good news to TLS yesterday. I wonder when we'll see the first bad news from 06520 trickle in.


I hope 06520 stays away from San Francisco and Boulder.

Wow, was that you actually showing some solidarity with me?!


Eh, I go for the groins when you start the fight but in general I think you're OKAY, I guess.

Awwwwww, I'm flattered.

User avatar
Pausanias
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Pausanias » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:26 pm

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
I hope 06520 stays away from San Francisco and Boulder.

Wow, was that you actually showing some solidarity with me?!


Eh, I go for the groins when you start the fight but in general I think you're OKAY, I guess.

Awwwwww, I'm flattered.


Boy is this thread getting maudlin.

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:27 pm

Pausanias wrote:Boy is this thread getting maudlin.

Yeah, but aren't they adorable?

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:27 pm

Don't worry, we'll find a way to derail it soon enough. I can fight with Kronk over almost anything.

owhlcn
Posts: 276
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:06 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby owhlcn » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:28 pm

BioEBear2010 wrote:Yeah, but aren't they adorable?


+ 1, only reason I still read this thread.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:29 pm

owhlcn wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:Yeah, but aren't they adorable?


+ 1, only reason I still read this thread.

Have you not gotten in yet? Also, whatever happened to those people (like you) who were asked to write an extra scholarship essay for Chicago?

User avatar
Anastasia Dee Dualla
Posts: 1165
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:03 am

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Anastasia Dee Dualla » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:34 pm

Still alive.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”