Yale 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:38 am

crackberry wrote:
BioEBear2010 wrote:
crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.

Hey, I don't mind :D Seriously, though, I think that's just the nature of the Yale thread. Not that many people get accepted to Yale in the first place, and a large proportion of those who do choose not to use TLS. Ergo, not many people to ask questions/talk about Yale. The majority of the YLS questions go in the In at Yale and Yale 2013 threads, too.

And the Violent Centaur Entourage thing cracks me up!

Really? I remember trying to find the In at Yale thread the other day and having to scroll through like 6 pages before I found it. I think the last post was like Feb. 20 or something.


+1. That thread is truly dead.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:41 am

Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:42 am

crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.


viewtopic.php?f=25&t=98978

I never read it, actually.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:43 am

crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.


Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:44 am

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.


Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.


Worried about karma, are you?

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:46 am

CardinalRules wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.


Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.


Worried about karma, are you?


Each SLS slot that gets taken is personal affront and injury to me.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:48 am

Kronk wrote:
CardinalRules wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.


Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.


Worried about karma, are you?


Each SLS slot that gets taken is personal affront and injury to me.


To be honest, though, plenty of other people have posted in "In at..." threads without being "In at..." at the time. I remember posting in the "In at Yale" thread before being accepted because I had a question for someone in there.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:49 am

No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:50 am

Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.

This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:50 am

Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.


Yes, I know; I had that feeling watching the Berkeley thread through November and December.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:51 am

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.

This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.


Also you don't care who gets into Chicago and who doesn't with SLS, Berk and NYU in your pocket.

User avatar
Dignan
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Dignan » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:52 am

crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.

Wait...this is a Yale thread? Damn. I thought this thread was about which school--NYU or Boalt--is better for securing a PI job in North Dakota.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:55 am

I think that this thread is the Yale thread in the sense that it's the best thread on TLS. :wink:

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:57 am

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.

This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.


Also you don't care who gets into Chicago and who doesn't with SLS, Berk and NYU in your pocket.

Fact: Chicago is a declining TTT full of super-serious gunners and no cute girls.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:58 am

Dignan wrote:
crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.

Wait...this is a Yale thread? Damn. I thought this thread was about which school--NYU or Boalt--is better for securing a PI job in North Dakota.

BoalTTT is better for anything than SUNY-Greenwich Village. Everyone knows this.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:59 am

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.

This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.


Also you don't care who gets into Chicago and who doesn't with SLS, Berk and NYU in your pocket.

Fact: Chicago is a declining TTT full of super-serious gunners and no cute girls.


Pfft, if you had gotten into UIUC you'd have received the yearbook-thing they send out and realize there are tons of cute girls at Chicago.

Their presence probably means it is indeed a declining TTT.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:00 am

crackberry wrote:
Dignan wrote:
crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.

Wait...this is a Yale thread? Damn. I thought this thread was about which school--NYU or Boalt--is better for securing a PI job in North Dakota.

BoalTTT is better for anything than SUNY-Greenwich Village. Everyone knows this.


BoalTTT's only peer is Cal State University - Palo AlTTTo.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:05 am

Kronk wrote:Pfft, if you had gotten into UIUC you'd have received the yearbook-thing they send out and realize there are tons of cute girls at Chicago.

Their presence probably means it is indeed a declining TTT.

Ahh, the old self-fulfilling prophecy conundrum.

Also, just found out the ex-GF (less than amiable split) is applying to LS this year. She will be attending UIUC with you most likely. Her presence definitely means it is a declining TTT.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:08 am

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:Pfft, if you had gotten into UIUC you'd have received the yearbook-thing they send out and realize there are tons of cute girls at Chicago.

Their presence probably means it is indeed a declining TTT.

Ahh, the old self-fulfilling prophecy conundrum.

Also, just found out the ex-GF (less than amiable split) is applying to LS this year. She will be attending UIUC with you most likely. Her presence definitely means it is a declining TTT.


I am still up in the air. I sent in my matching forms to The University of Telegraph Avenue yesterday and I am hoping for good news.

Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:14 am

Kronk wrote:Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).

When do you hear back from Cal State Oakland?

On another note, I now censor myself every time I post in this thread, armed with the knowledge that Asha is watching.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:16 am

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).

When do you hear back from Cal State Oakland?

On another note, I now censor myself every time I post in this thread, armed with the knowledge that Asha is watching.


I have no idea. When students stop rioting over tuition increases, probably.

I don't attempt a censor. I hope she finds blatant immaturity oddly appealing.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:18 am

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).

When do you hear back from Cal State Oakland?

On another note, I now censor myself every time I post in this thread, armed with the knowledge that Asha is watching.


I have no idea. When students stop rioting over tuition increases, probably.

I don't attempt a censor. I hope she finds blatant immaturity oddly appealing.

TBF, nearly every one of my posts is either sarcastic or blatantly immature. I meant more that I won't curse or say the kind of thing I just PMed you.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28174
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby Kronk » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:21 am

Haha. Agreed. Although I just used the c-word in the lounge, which is about as inappropriate as it gets, so I hope she only reads the Yale threads. (no quotey)

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:23 am

I don't feel the need to censor myself more than usual in this thread; Asha seems like a sensible type who wouldn't be terribly concerned over something off-beat.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Yale 2010

Postby crackberry » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:23 am

Didn't we already determine she reads (or at least knows of) the USS: BP?




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: guybourdin, lillawyer2, mm2368 and 7 guests