Yale 2010 Forum
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
So the discussion that followed my post seemed to confirm my post. Is this correct? I win?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
NYU rejected 2 applicants with those numbers?? I didn't know how lucky I was!
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
It's in a table like this where you can really tell the difference between Yale/Stanford and Harvard:
http://www.hourumd.com/?lsat=180&gpa=3.75
http://www.hourumd.com/?lsat=180&gpa=3.75
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Not sure how much can be extrapolated from some of these tiny sample sizes.
- Nom Sawyer
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Yale 2010
I no longer trust Hourumd tho... its wayyy outdatedcrackberry wrote:It's in a table like this where you can really tell the difference between Yale/Stanford and Harvard:
http://www.hourumd.com/?lsat=180&gpa=3.75
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Be that as it may, that is a telling table.SolarWind wrote:I no longer trust Hourumd tho... its wayyy outdatedcrackberry wrote:It's in a table like this where you can really tell the difference between Yale/Stanford and Harvard:
http://www.hourumd.com/?lsat=180&gpa=3.75
EDIT: Yes, I am trying to make myself feel better after not getting a JR2.
- Nom Sawyer
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Yale 2010
I think you'll get it crackberry, might just have to wait a little longer. The 3.9 from a top10 university seems to actually work pretty well for HLS, unless its inflated by transfer credit. A girl at my school (top 20) got a JR2 already with a LSAT below median.crackberry wrote:Be that as it may, that is a telling table.SolarWind wrote:I no longer trust Hourumd tho... its wayyy outdatedcrackberry wrote:It's in a table like this where you can really tell the difference between Yale/Stanford and Harvard:
http://www.hourumd.com/?lsat=180&gpa=3.75
EDIT: Yes, I am trying to make myself feel better after not getting a JR2.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Well I certainly appreciate the optimism, but I'm below HLS' 25th for LSAT and just below the 75th for GPA. I think if my GPA had been about .03 higher, I'd have had a better shot as that would have made me a reverse splitter.SolarWind wrote:I think you'll get it crackberry, might just have to wait a little longer. The 3.9 from a top10 university seems to actually work pretty well for HLS, unless its inflated by transfer credit. A girl at my school (top 20) got a JR2 already with a LSAT below median.crackberry wrote:Be that as it may, that is a telling table.SolarWind wrote:I no longer trust Hourumd tho... its wayyy outdatedcrackberry wrote:It's in a table like this where you can really tell the difference between Yale/Stanford and Harvard:
http://www.hourumd.com/?lsat=180&gpa=3.75
EDIT: Yes, I am trying to make myself feel better after not getting a JR2.
There are a few people - BaiAilian and Gargamel in particular - who I really think will get one and the fact that they haven't yet gives me hope. But I'm not holding my breath. I really want Stanford anyway, and I just have to hope that my 3.9+ from Stanford UG gets me in that door.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
It was more the follow-around-Managamy-flinging-insults that I was referring to. Pretty sure you were aware of that already, though.puppins wrote:Not sure why is is douchey to suggest that Yale requires softs, not just numbers. They are the number one school, admit a tiny class, and don't need to be numbers obsessed with a high yield and attracting the best candidates.VoidSix wrote: Puppins is just being a douche-bag or douche-bagess. Not sure which.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Usually guys like having girls follow them around, but in this case...meh.VoidSix wrote:It was more the follow-around-Managamy-flinging-insults that I was referring to. Pretty sure you were aware of that already, though.puppins wrote:Not sure why is is douchey to suggest that Yale requires softs, not just numbers. They are the number one school, admit a tiny class, and don't need to be numbers obsessed with a high yield and attracting the best candidates.VoidSix wrote: Puppins is just being a douche-bag or douche-bagess. Not sure which.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:44 pm
Re: Yale 2010
So will some people start hearing back next Monday?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
[quote="crackberry]
There are a few people - BaiAilian and Gargamel in particular - who I really think will get one and the fact that they haven't yet gives me hope. But I'm not holding my breath. I really want Stanford anyway, and I just have to hope that my 3.9+ from Stanford UG gets me in that door.[/quote]
I'm very confident that the door is going to open for you!!
There are a few people - BaiAilian and Gargamel in particular - who I really think will get one and the fact that they haven't yet gives me hope. But I'm not holding my breath. I really want Stanford anyway, and I just have to hope that my 3.9+ from Stanford UG gets me in that door.[/quote]
I'm very confident that the door is going to open for you!!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Doesn't this comment belong on the Stanford thread? I suspect that their Dean would find it more inspiring reading than the Yale Dean.VoidSix wrote:Stanford > Yale.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
I'm playing hard to get. Who REALLY turns down Yale?managamy wrote:Doesn't this comment belong on the Stanford thread? I suspect that their Dean would find it more inspiring reading than the Yale Dean.VoidSix wrote:Stanford > Yale.
- Nom Sawyer
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Yale 2010
This is called subtly negging the hot girl so that she chases after you instead. Also called complimenting her friends instead of the one u'r interested in.VoidSix wrote:Stanford > Yale.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
LOL, I used to try that subtle tactic sometimes but I must have messed something up along the way, since it never worked for me as well as the straight-up, practical approach. If a resume documenting relationship stability / durability were a criterion for law school, I'd be going to Cooley.SolarWind wrote:This is called subtly negging the hot girl so that she chases after you instead. Also called complimenting her friends instead of the one u'r interested in.VoidSix wrote:Stanford > Yale.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Let's be serious. Stanford is No. 1. Yale is a TTT and Harvard is a degree mill.VoidSix wrote:Stanford > Yale.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
I'd be going to Princeton with Phillip Banks. Girlfriend from sophomore year HS through freshman year -> new girlfriend from sophomore year of college through the present. Yikes.managamy wrote:LOL, I used to try that subtle tactic sometimes but I must have messed something up along the way, since it never worked for me as well as the straight-up, practical approach. If a resume documenting relationship stability / durability were a criterion for law school, I'd be going to Cooley.SolarWind wrote:This is called subtly negging the hot girl so that she chases after you instead. Also called complimenting her friends instead of the one u'r interested in.VoidSix wrote:Stanford > Yale.
-
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:03 am
Re: Yale 2010
.
Last edited by Anastasia Dee Dualla on Sat May 02, 2015 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Where did that post go about YLS announcing via Twitter that its first decisions will be going out this week?
http://twitter.com/ylsadmissions
(Wow people are deleting posts all over this thread.)
http://twitter.com/ylsadmissions
(Wow people are deleting posts all over this thread.)
Last edited by crackberry on Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:42 am
Re: Yale 2010
crackberry wrote:Where did that post go about YLS announcing via Twitter that its first decisions will be going out this week?
http://twitter.com/ylsadmissions
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:06 pm
Re: Yale 2010
i think my heart just stoppedalleyoop86 wrote:crackberry wrote:Where did that post go about YLS announcing via Twitter that its first decisions will be going out this week?
http://twitter.com/ylsadmissions
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:52 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Meh. Any hopes that my HLS acceptance might have briefly fostered about my getting into Yale are quickly evaporating since I've been getting no love whatsoever from Berkeley. Ah well!
- marbletop
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:21 pm
Re: Yale 2010
+so, so many.owhlcn wrote:i think my heart just stoppedalleyoop86 wrote:crackberry wrote:Where did that post go about YLS announcing via Twitter that its first decisions will be going out this week?
http://twitter.com/ylsadmissions
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login