+1. That thread is truly dead.crackberry wrote:Really? I remember trying to find the In at Yale thread the other day and having to scroll through like 6 pages before I found it. I think the last post was like Feb. 20 or something.BioEBear2010 wrote:Hey, I don't mind Seriously, though, I think that's just the nature of the Yale thread. Not that many people get accepted to Yale in the first place, and a large proportion of those who do choose not to use TLS. Ergo, not many people to ask questions/talk about Yale. The majority of the YLS questions go in the In at Yale and Yale 2013 threads, too.crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.
And the Violent Centaur Entourage thing cracks me up!
Yale 2010 Forum
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 25&t=98978crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.
I never read it, actually.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Worried about karma, are you?Kronk wrote:Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Each SLS slot that gets taken is personal affront and injury to me.CardinalRules wrote:Worried about karma, are you?Kronk wrote:Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
To be honest, though, plenty of other people have posted in "In at..." threads without being "In at..." at the time. I remember posting in the "In at Yale" thread before being accepted because I had a question for someone in there.Kronk wrote:Each SLS slot that gets taken is personal affront and injury to me.CardinalRules wrote:Worried about karma, are you?Kronk wrote:Just don't post in it. I accidentally posted in the In at Stanford thread and it depresses me daily.crackberry wrote:Can one of you lucky devils link to the Yale 2013 thread? I'd like to read it but have no idea where it is.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Yes, I know; I had that feeling watching the Berkeley thread through November and December.Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Also you don't care who gets into Chicago and who doesn't with SLS, Berk and NYU in your pocket.crackberry wrote:This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.
- Dignan
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Wait...this is a Yale thread? Damn. I thought this thread was about which school--NYU or Boalt--is better for securing a PI job in North Dakota.crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
I think that this thread is the Yale thread in the sense that it's the best thread on TLS.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Fact: Chicago is a declining TTT full of super-serious gunners and no cute girls.Kronk wrote:Also you don't care who gets into Chicago and who doesn't with SLS, Berk and NYU in your pocket.crackberry wrote:This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
BoalTTT is better for anything than SUNY-Greenwich Village. Everyone knows this.Dignan wrote:Wait...this is a Yale thread? Damn. I thought this thread was about which school--NYU or Boalt--is better for securing a PI job in North Dakota.crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Pfft, if you had gotten into UIUC you'd have received the yearbook-thing they send out and realize there are tons of cute girls at Chicago.crackberry wrote:Fact: Chicago is a declining TTT full of super-serious gunners and no cute girls.Kronk wrote:Also you don't care who gets into Chicago and who doesn't with SLS, Berk and NYU in your pocket.crackberry wrote:This is exactly why I would never post in an "In at..." thread of a school I wasn't admitted to. Actually, I posted in the In at Chicago thread, but that was just to call you out.Kronk wrote:No I know, it's just depressing because you are constantly seeing people get in and realizing you're not part of yet another wave.
Their presence probably means it is indeed a declining TTT.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
BoalTTT's only peer is Cal State University - Palo AlTTTo.crackberry wrote:BoalTTT is better for anything than SUNY-Greenwich Village. Everyone knows this.Dignan wrote:Wait...this is a Yale thread? Damn. I thought this thread was about which school--NYU or Boalt--is better for securing a PI job in North Dakota.crackberry wrote:This thread has basically deteriorated (improved?) to a point where the six or seven of us (Kronk, CardinalRules, tomhobbes, Dignan, BioE and myself plus Kretzy sometimes) come to pontificate and make fun of each other. And we only sometimes talk about Yale.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Ahh, the old self-fulfilling prophecy conundrum.Kronk wrote:Pfft, if you had gotten into UIUC you'd have received the yearbook-thing they send out and realize there are tons of cute girls at Chicago.
Their presence probably means it is indeed a declining TTT.
Also, just found out the ex-GF (less than amiable split) is applying to LS this year. She will be attending UIUC with you most likely. Her presence definitely means it is a declining TTT.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
I am still up in the air. I sent in my matching forms to The University of Telegraph Avenue yesterday and I am hoping for good news.crackberry wrote:Ahh, the old self-fulfilling prophecy conundrum.Kronk wrote:Pfft, if you had gotten into UIUC you'd have received the yearbook-thing they send out and realize there are tons of cute girls at Chicago.
Their presence probably means it is indeed a declining TTT.
Also, just found out the ex-GF (less than amiable split) is applying to LS this year. She will be attending UIUC with you most likely. Her presence definitely means it is a declining TTT.
Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
When do you hear back from Cal State Oakland?Kronk wrote:Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).
On another note, I now censor myself every time I post in this thread, armed with the knowledge that Asha is watching.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
I have no idea. When students stop rioting over tuition increases, probably.crackberry wrote:When do you hear back from Cal State Oakland?Kronk wrote:Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).
On another note, I now censor myself every time I post in this thread, armed with the knowledge that Asha is watching.
I don't attempt a censor. I hope she finds blatant immaturity oddly appealing.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
TBF, nearly every one of my posts is either sarcastic or blatantly immature. I meant more that I won't curse or say the kind of thing I just PMed you.Kronk wrote:I have no idea. When students stop rioting over tuition increases, probably.crackberry wrote:When do you hear back from Cal State Oakland?Kronk wrote:Hope your ex is attractive, as my relationship will inevitably fail if I choose to move across the country for three years (not true, but I still hope your ex is attractive and I can tease you about it).
On another note, I now censor myself every time I post in this thread, armed with the knowledge that Asha is watching.
I don't attempt a censor. I hope she finds blatant immaturity oddly appealing.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Haha. Agreed. Although I just used the c-word in the lounge, which is about as inappropriate as it gets, so I hope she only reads the Yale threads. (no quotey)
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Yale 2010
I don't feel the need to censor myself more than usual in this thread; Asha seems like a sensible type who wouldn't be terribly concerned over something off-beat.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale 2010
Didn't we already determine she reads (or at least knows of) the USS: BP?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login