Tangerine Gleam wrote:You'd better get on it, homeslice. They love the early apps.
Yeah. I submitted in 2009.

Tangerine Gleam wrote:You'd better get on it, homeslice. They love the early apps.
tintin wrote:not bad till the 7th??? aghrrhrhr!!!! i was gearing up to be anxious today but i suppose i'll just slip back into lethargy...
rolark wrote:tintin wrote:not bad till the 7th??? aghrrhrhr!!!! i was gearing up to be anxious today but i suppose i'll just slip back into lethargy...
I don't want to reignite your anxiety, but I sent a message to the admissions office today updating them about my new LSAT score. They replied.
boilercat wrote:rolark wrote:tintin wrote:not bad till the 7th??? aghrrhrhr!!!! i was gearing up to be anxious today but i suppose i'll just slip back into lethargy...
I don't want to reignite your anxiety, but I sent a message to the admissions office today updating them about my new LSAT score. They replied.
Do they average scores?
I know they claim they do on their FAQs site. But right after that, they talk about statistical significance of scores within the s.d., which makes me think they might take the higher score if it's a significant increase...
boilercat wrote:rolark wrote:tintin wrote:not bad till the 7th??? aghrrhrhr!!!! i was gearing up to be anxious today but i suppose i'll just slip back into lethargy...
I don't want to reignite your anxiety, but I sent a message to the admissions office today updating them about my new LSAT score. They replied.
Do they average scores?
I know they claim they do on their FAQs site. But right after that, they talk about statistical significance of scores within the s.d., which makes me think they might take the higher score if it's a significant increase...
Oli wrote:Veritas wrote:sweet!
haha there you go veri, couldnt find a better onein class and attempting to pay attention
Veritas wrote:Oli wrote:Veritas wrote:sweet!
haha there you go veri, couldnt find a better onein class and attempting to pay attention
is this still the self tar?
Oli wrote:Veritas wrote:Oli wrote:Veritas wrote:sweet!
haha there you go veri, couldnt find a better onein class and attempting to pay attention
is this still the self tar?
Yeah I'm gonna take it down when my prof let's us open our laptops again
Veritas wrote:Veritas wrote:Oli wrote:Veritas wrote:sweet!
haha there you go veri, couldnt find a better onein class and attempting to pay attention
is this still the self tar?
wow, you're really pretty
Oli wrote:Veritas wrote:Oli wrote:Veritas wrote:sweet!
haha there you go veri, couldnt find a better onein class and attempting to pay attention
is this still the self tar?
Yeah I'm gonna take it down when my prof let's us open our laptops again
msch0i wrote:Does anyone know anything about the process of sending applicants to committee review? As in...do they send out a huge wave of rejections and then send only certain applicants to committee, or do all non-Dean Tom applicants get sent to committee review?
finalaspects wrote:msch0i wrote:Does anyone know anything about the process of sending applicants to committee review? As in...do they send out a huge wave of rejections and then send only certain applicants to committee, or do all non-Dean Tom applicants get sent to committee review?
no idea how the committee review works, but the massive amounts of rejections via status checker starts end of January. at least it did for last year's decisions.
msch0i wrote:Does anyone know anything about the process of sending applicants to committee review? As in...do they send out a huge wave of rejections and then send only certain applicants to committee, or do all non-Dean Tom applicants get sent to committee review?
Oli wrote:finalaspects wrote:msch0i wrote:Does anyone know anything about the process of sending applicants to committee review? As in...do they send out a huge wave of rejections and then send only certain applicants to committee, or do all non-Dean Tom applicants get sent to committee review?
no idea how the committee review works, but the massive amounts of rejections via status checker starts end of January. at least it did for last year's decisions.
Berkeley breaks up with people via status checker???? Thats almost as bad as a post it!!!!
Oli wrote:finalaspects wrote:msch0i wrote:Does anyone know anything about the process of sending applicants to committee review? As in...do they send out a huge wave of rejections and then send only certain applicants to committee, or do all non-Dean Tom applicants get sent to committee review?
no idea how the committee review works, but the massive amounts of rejections via status checker starts end of January. at least it did for last year's decisions.
Berkeley breaks up with people via status checker???? Thats almost as bad as a post it!!!!
msch0i wrote:
I don't know, I think I'd prefer being dinged that way instead of seeing a "decision rendered" and stalking the mailman while writhing in agony for days before getting the bad news
managamy wrote:I love how this thread keeps charging along even though we all know that Boalt is still closed until Thursday.
Status checker ding would >>> a rejection letter for me. One click, it's over, and you can banish them from your mind and your bookmarks forever.
Oli wrote:managamy wrote:I love how this thread keeps charging along even though we all know that Boalt is still closed until Thursday.
Status checker ding would >>> a rejection letter for me. One click, it's over, and you can banish them from your mind and your bookmarks forever.
Sigh managamy, stop pretending like youre gonna get rejected anywhere...someone posted a thread a while ago asking about his chances with a 4.0/176....go talk to him
managamy wrote:Oli wrote:managamy wrote:I love how this thread keeps charging along even though we all know that Boalt is still closed until Thursday.
Status checker ding would >>> a rejection letter for me. One click, it's over, and you can banish them from your mind and your bookmarks forever.
Sigh managamy, stop pretending like youre gonna get rejected anywhere...someone posted a thread a while ago asking about his chances with a 4.0/176....go talk to him
LOL, I once posted a thread over in the "What are my chances?" forum entitled "4.11/178." People thought that I was a flame.Honestly, though, I'm expecting WLs/dings from at least 4 of my remaining 8 schools.
Oh, and I suspect that you posted a fake self-tar just to tease poor gullible veritas.
managamy wrote:Oli wrote:managamy wrote:I love how this thread keeps charging along even though we all know that Boalt is still closed until Thursday.
Status checker ding would >>> a rejection letter for me. One click, it's over, and you can banish them from your mind and your bookmarks forever.
Sigh managamy, stop pretending like youre gonna get rejected anywhere...someone posted a thread a while ago asking about his chances with a 4.0/176....go talk to him
LOL, I once posted a thread over in the "What are my chances?" forum entitled "4.11/178." People thought that I was a flame.Honestly, though, I'm expecting WLs/dings from at least 4 of my remaining 8 schools.
Oh, and I suspect that you posted a fake self-tar just to tease poor gullible veritas.
Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists�
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests