Re: Berkeley 2010
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:10 pm
Congrats to all who were admitted today!
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=90390
Congrats! Exact numbers twin. When did you submit?jasonportwood wrote:hey guys - wasn't following this thread too closely since i had just submitted 11/8, and wham, got a call from a 510 number... I'm in also!
my numbers on LSN are slightly off, but #'s in TLS profile are accurate.
0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Congrats! Exact numbers twin. When did you submit?jasonportwood wrote:hey guys - wasn't following this thread too closely since i had just submitted 11/8, and wham, got a call from a 510 number... I'm in also!
my numbers on LSN are slightly off, but #'s in TLS profile are accurate.
RC failjasonportwood wrote:
hey guys - wasn't following this thread too closely since i had just submitted 11/8, and wham, got a call from a 510 number... I'm in also!
my numbers on LSN are slightly off, but #'s in TLS profile are accurate.
Congrats! Exact numbers twin. When did you submit?
I edited after haha. I only saw accepted and then went right into another minor heart attack.CyLaw wrote:0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Congrats! Exact numbers twin. When did you submit?jasonportwood wrote:hey guys - wasn't following this thread too closely since i had just submitted 11/8, and wham, got a call from a 510 number... I'm in also!
my numbers on LSN are slightly off, but #'s in TLS profile are accurate.
Haha, there isn't a person here who won't empathize with that!I edited after haha. I only saw accepted and then went right into another minor heart attack.
you saved yourself within the time period required to stay on track to answer all questions within the 35 minute time period... good job!Shaggier1 wrote:Quote:
I edited after haha. I only saw accepted and then went right into another minor heart attack.
Is DC west of NYC?? (Totally selfish question hoping my call is still coming )jasonportwood wrote:you saved yourself within the time period required to stay on track to answer all questions within the 35 minute time period... good job!Shaggier1 wrote:Quote:
I edited after haha. I only saw accepted and then went right into another minor heart attack.
in support of your east coast theory, I am in NY...
great! my hopes are kept alivejasonportwood wrote: in support of your east coast theory, I am in NY...
quite a bit! the time difference is astounding.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Is DC west of NYC?? (Totally selfish question hoping my call is still coming )jasonportwood wrote:you saved yourself within the time period required to stay on track to answer all questions within the 35 minute time period... good job!Shaggier1 wrote:Quote:
I edited after haha. I only saw accepted and then went right into another minor heart attack.
in support of your east coast theory, I am in NY...
Still Hope!jasonportwood wrote:
quite a bit! the time difference is astounding.
good luck to all still waiting today, i'm sure more are on the way. i am off to celebrate both my birthday (several days ago) and my good news...
This single post was the 2nd greatest thing I've seen today.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Still Hope!jasonportwood wrote:
quite a bit! the time difference is astounding.
good luck to all still waiting today, i'm sure more are on the way. i am off to celebrate both my birthday (several days ago) and my good news...
DC Longitude: 77° 02' W
NYC Longitude: 73° 47' W
I don't think you should be worried, because most of acceptances have been high LSATs so far (only a few below 173).tintin wrote:should i be worried that people who applied way later than me are getting in??
im scared..........!
but CONGRATS to all the acceptances!
+1protokurios wrote:I don't think you should be worried, because most of acceptances have been high LSATs so far (only a few below 173).tintin wrote:should i be worried that people who applied way later than me are getting in??
im scared..........!
but CONGRATS to all the acceptances!
OneKnight wrote:+1protokurios wrote:I don't think you should be worried, because most of acceptances have been high LSATs so far (only a few below 173).tintin wrote:should i be worried that people who applied way later than me are getting in??
im scared..........!
but CONGRATS to all the acceptances!
I think us reverse-splitters are in for a bit of a wait. I might have to take up chain smoking in the interim, but I'd be perfectly happy getting in after a committee review.
It's hard to say at this point. There's just not enough data. *cough cough*EijiMiyake wrote:OneKnight wrote:+1protokurios wrote:I don't think you should be worried, because most of acceptances have been high LSATs so far (only a few below 173).tintin wrote:should i be worried that people who applied way later than me are getting in??
im scared..........!
but CONGRATS to all the acceptances!
I think us reverse-splitters are in for a bit of a wait. I might have to take up chain smoking in the interim, but I'd be perfectly happy getting in after a committee review.
There are plenty of folks > median for both GPA/LSAT (and > 75% for that matter) that went under review and haven't heard anything, so I'm not sure that's the pattern.
Yes, multiple people.JollyGreenGiant wrote:I haven't been following too closely but has anyone who has been UR on or after 11/18 been admitted?