Stanford 2010!!!

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
jsoell
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:34 am

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby jsoell » Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:34 am

Haribo wrote:
adameus wrote:
dutchstriker wrote:Why won't she call me? :(



+1 and I'm not even sure if I should expect a call as no one seems to know if she calls international applicants.


I haven't even gotten a complete email, is this normal?


Last year she emailed international applicants (I think. At least, she emailed me.) I don't know about Canadians, but I imagine non-North American international accepted students will get an email again this year.


Hey Haribo ---

You still so far south of the border you´re almost north?

I´m out of the country, and I got a call that, no surprise here, didn´t let me pick up, followed by an email saying that she had unsuccessfully tried to call.

User avatar
somewhatwayward
Posts: 1446
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby somewhatwayward » Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:16 pm

so would it be all right to mention in my LOCI that i'd like to be at stanford bc my younger sister is an UG there? (not as my main reason for wanting to attend but at the tail end of the paragraph about why i still like stanford)

User avatar
Herb Watchfell
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:48 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Herb Watchfell » Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:41 pm

somewhatwayward wrote:so would it be all right to mention in my LOCI that i'd like to be at stanford bc my younger sister is an UG there? (not as my main reason for wanting to attend but at the tail end of the paragraph about why i still like stanford)


say whatever you want, it won't matter.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27895
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:04 pm

Herb Watchfell wrote:
somewhatwayward wrote:so would it be all right to mention in my LOCI that i'd like to be at stanford bc my younger sister is an UG there? (not as my main reason for wanting to attend but at the tail end of the paragraph about why i still like stanford)


say whatever you want, it won't matter.


Mods are watching your posts, just fyi. Might want to say something worthwhile ever so often.

User avatar
Lmao Zedong
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Lmao Zedong » Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:08 pm

Herb Watchfell wrote:
somewhatwayward wrote:so would it be all right to mention in my LOCI that i'd like to be at stanford bc my younger sister is an UG there? (not as my main reason for wanting to attend but at the tail end of the paragraph about why i still like stanford)


say whatever you want, it won't matter.


you blow

i suspect you're the same person behind a shitty series of trolls this board has had

there was celibidache a few months ago who i don't think is active anymore, there was renaixenca more recently, and now herb. all with several dozen posts, all with vaguely pretentious names, all spewing eerily similar brands of useless bullshit. if i'm anywhere near on track with this, though, one would think the IP in question would've met its fate at the hands of the banstick some time ago

User avatar
adameus
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby adameus » Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:21 pm

Haribo wrote:
adameus wrote:
dutchstriker wrote:Why won't she call me? :(



+1 and I'm not even sure if I should expect a call as no one seems to know if she calls international applicants.


I haven't even gotten a complete email, is this normal?


Last year she emailed international applicants (I think. At least, she emailed me.) I don't know about Canadians, but I imagine non-North American international accepted students will get an email again this year.



Thanks! I will attempt to not obsessively check my email now.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:52 pm

Herb Watchfell wrote:
somewhatwayward wrote:so would it be all right to mention in my LOCI that i'd like to be at stanford bc my younger sister is an UG there? (not as my main reason for wanting to attend but at the tail end of the paragraph about why i still like stanford)


say whatever you want, it won't matter.

Also, idiot, you never responded to my post in the In at Stanford thread.

Herb is a Renaixenca alt.

User avatar
theadw
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:05 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby theadw » Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:57 pm

Don't know if it's been mentioned, but outdoor space that abuts SLS is named "Cooley Court."

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27895
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:06 pm

crackberry wrote:
Herb Watchfell wrote:
somewhatwayward wrote:so would it be all right to mention in my LOCI that i'd like to be at stanford bc my younger sister is an UG there? (not as my main reason for wanting to attend but at the tail end of the paragraph about why i still like stanford)


say whatever you want, it won't matter.

Also, idiot, you never responded to my post in the In at Stanford thread.

Herb is a Renaixenca alt.


I can probably get Hawkeye or Helm to check if he's an alt and ban.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:11 pm

Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Herb Watchfell wrote:
somewhatwayward wrote:so would it be all right to mention in my LOCI that i'd like to be at stanford bc my younger sister is an UG there? (not as my main reason for wanting to attend but at the tail end of the paragraph about why i still like stanford)


say whatever you want, it won't matter.

Also, idiot, you never responded to my post in the In at Stanford thread.

Herb is a Renaixenca alt.


I can probably get Hawkeye or Helm to check if he's an alt and ban.

Do it. He sucks. Let's get rid of him. Plus, I'm curious to see if I'm right. Clyde_Darrow pointed out a suspicious timeline (Renaixenca's last post was Feb. 27, Herb's first was March 1 or 2).

User avatar
Lmao Zedong
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Lmao Zedong » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:13 pm

crackberry wrote:Do it. He sucks. Let's get rid of him. Plus, I'm curious to see if I'm right. Clyde_Darrow pointed out a suspicious timeline (Renaixenca's last post was Feb. 27, Herb's first was March 1 or 2).


is this a theory you had previously? what about celibidache, i bet they're all the same

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:14 pm

Lmao Zedong wrote:
crackberry wrote:Do it. He sucks. Let's get rid of him. Plus, I'm curious to see if I'm right. Clyde_Darrow pointed out a suspicious timeline (Renaixenca's last post was Feb. 27, Herb's first was March 1 or 2).


is this a theory you had previously? what about celibidache, i bet they're all the same

Yeah, I've thought that for a while. I actually don't remember celibidache, but you could be right about that as well.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27895
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:18 pm

k. Hawkeye will do anything once you get him on video chat. hth

I also had this theory. He disappeared right after he made that distasteful Dean Deal comment and I PMed him that I was going to have mods watch his posts.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:21 pm

Kronk wrote:k. Hawkeye will do anything once you get him on video chat. hth

I also had this theory. He disappeared right after he made that distasteful Dean Deal comment and I PMed him that I was going to have mods watch his posts.

Yeah, it'd be a weird coincidence if they're different people. I'm nearly positive they are the same. I guess we'll see.

ProudFather
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ProudFather » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:38 pm

So I'm guessing with this being finals week that those of us waiting probably shouldn't be holding our collective breath for any news. Then, of course, next week is spring break ...

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27895
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:39 pm

ProudFather wrote:So I'm guessing with this being finals week that those of us waiting probably shouldn't be holding our collective breath for any news. Then, of course, next week is spring break ...


Would finals week affect admissions? Spring break would, I'm sure.

User avatar
adameus
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby adameus » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:43 pm

ProudFather wrote:So I'm guessing with this being finals week that those of us waiting probably shouldn't be holding our collective breath for any news. Then, of course, next week is spring break ...


That avatar is filthy. And I don't think admissions staff write finals.

User avatar
bloodonthetracks
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby bloodonthetracks » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:45 pm

Kronk wrote:
ProudFather wrote:So I'm guessing with this being finals week that those of us waiting probably shouldn't be holding our collective breath for any news. Then, of course, next week is spring break ...


Would finals week affect admissions? Spring break would, I'm sure.


i would like to believe that these people are way too busy at this time of year to take spring breaks.

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:46 pm

adameus wrote:
ProudFather wrote:So I'm guessing with this being finals week that those of us waiting probably shouldn't be holding our collective breath for any news. Then, of course, next week is spring break ...


That avatar is filthy. And I don't think admissions staff write finals.

To be fair, they probably don't want to call people while they're taking finals/about to take a final. That would be quite the distraction :D

ProudFather
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ProudFather » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:47 pm

Kronk wrote:Would finals week affect admissions? Spring break would, I'm sure.


Not sure. I was just guessing that it might mean that the professors who are involved in the process would be busy.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27895
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:48 pm

bloodonthetracks wrote:
Kronk wrote:
ProudFather wrote:So I'm guessing with this being finals week that those of us waiting probably shouldn't be holding our collective breath for any news. Then, of course, next week is spring break ...


Would finals week affect admissions? Spring break would, I'm sure.


i would like to believe that these people are way too busy at this time of year to take spring breaks.


Eh, I think Dean Perry at UChi took Spring Break. I would assume they do to some extent.

ProudFather
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ProudFather » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:50 pm

ProudFather wrote:
Kronk wrote:Would finals week affect admissions? Spring break would, I'm sure.


Not sure. I was just guessing that it might mean that the professors who are involved in the process would be busy.

It also serves as a form of self-deception, so I can supposedly concentrate on getting other things done. It's obviously working really well for me.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:08 pm

Kronk wrote:
bloodonthetracks wrote:
Kronk wrote:
ProudFather wrote:So I'm guessing with this being finals week that those of us waiting probably shouldn't be holding our collective breath for any news. Then, of course, next week is spring break ...


Would finals week affect admissions? Spring break would, I'm sure.


i would like to believe that these people are way too busy at this time of year to take spring breaks.


Eh, I think Dean Perry at UChi took Spring Break. I would assume they do to some extent.

"UChi" is second-tier garbage. No wonder she takes Spring Break.

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:09 pm

crackberry wrote:"UChi" is second-tier garbage. No wonder she takes Spring Break.

Bitter much? I still am.

User avatar
adameus
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby adameus » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:10 pm

BioEBear2010 wrote:
crackberry wrote:"UChi" is second-tier garbage. No wonder she takes Spring Break.

Bitter much? I still am.


at least you guys weren't outright rejected at michigan.....




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bleakchimera2, Google Adsense [Bot], margaretmitchell, MSNbot Media, nslaw123, potterotter, sonyco and 17 guests