Page 70 of 123

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:18 pm
by Kretzy
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Also, to quote adameus from the Chicago vs. NYU thread:
adameus wrote:wow it seems any thread on here longer than 2 pages gets hijacked by people talking about vaguely related issues and crackberry coming in to whore/troll for Stanford. I don't think crack even has a friend who was considering between Chi and NYU, he just wanted to have a reason to come in here and weasel in some Stanford trolling :P
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=100
Really proud of that one eh, boss?
No, not particularly, but I think it qualifies me as "infamous," which, to be fair, is not a good thing.
Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:19 pm
by Kronk
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:Also, given your "definitions" from the "dictionary," I'd wonder why you're bragging about yourself being an infamous poaster. I believe this proves my point. If not, you're giving yourself far too much credit for annoying people. The only person you successfully troll is me.
When you hear the words "Stanford" and "TLS" who is the first poster you think of?
Doesn't make either of you disreputable. Note that I don't care about intricacies in definition, but you tend to correct my internet grammar so often I feel obligated.
TBF, your grammar sucks.
I hate you.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:20 pm
by Kronk
Kretzy wrote:Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.
I know right? And the prole doesn't even have 4000 poasts yet.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:21 pm
by crackberry
Kretzy wrote:Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.
My life is complete.
Kronk wrote:I hate you.
See above line.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:24 pm
by ConMan345
Kretzy wrote: Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:24 pm
by Kronk
crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:26 pm
by ConMan345
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
You go/went to Berkeley don't/didn't you?

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:27 pm
by Kretzy
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Egregious anti-anal trolling.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:28 pm
by ConMan345
Kretzy wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Egregious anti-anal trolling.

You went there.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:30 pm
by Kronk
Kretzy wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Egregious anti-anal trolling.
180.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:31 pm
by Kronk
ConMan345 wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
You go/went to Berkeley don't/didn't you?
No, crackberry's advances on my grammar just make me simmer with rage. I was 33% English major in UG, so that's pretty much all we have.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:38 pm
by ConMan345
Kronk wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
You go/went to Berkeley don't/didn't you?
No, crackberry's advances on my grammar just make me simmer with rage. I was 33% English major in UG, so that's pretty much all we have.
Funny how that's all we have yet we were (probably) never directly taught grammar in college. I think I also learned how to write coherently and succinctly. Judge Motz of the 9th Circuit said, "For law, just remember your ABCs: accuracy, brevity and clarity. It's as simple and as difficult as that." I think English took care of the latter two, law school will fill in the first.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:40 pm
by crackberry
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:45 pm
by crackberry
ConMan345 wrote:
Kretzy wrote: Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros
Wow, that thing is awesome.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:48 pm
by ConMan345
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.
Emphasis on slightly debilitating?

;)

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:49 pm
by Kretzy
ConMan345 wrote:
Kretzy wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Egregious anti-anal trolling.

You went there.
Yeah. I normally self-censor on these boards. In real-life, I have no standards of appropriateness. I hope I don't embarrass myself too thoroughly in front of our third tomorrow, Kronk.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:50 pm
by mochafury
Can we momentarily stop chewing each other's lollipops so that the damn thread doesn't bump? I don't mind poasting, but NOT ON TUESDAYS AND FRIDAYS in the Stanford thread. As it is, I pull my phone out of my pocket with lightning speed. Who knows what could happen if I grabbed something else by accident.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:52 pm
by ConMan345
mochafury wrote:Can we momentarily stop chewing each other's lollipops so that the damn thread doesn't bump? I don't mind poasting, but NOT ON TUESDAYS AND FRIDAYS in the Stanford thread. As it is, I pull my phone out of my pocket with lightning speed. Who knows what could happen if I grabbed something else by accident.

Keep 'em coming.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:52 pm
by crackberry
ConMan345 wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.
Emphasis on slightly debilitating?

;)
Damn. Started to write "getting under your skin," before I remembered the "egregious anti-anal trolling" comment and so thought better of it.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:52 pm
by Kronk
ConMan345 wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?
Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.
Emphasis on slightly debilitating?

;)
Well played and fully appreciated.

And I think your current 250 topic was far better.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:54 pm
by crackberry
Kronk wrote:And I think your current 250 topic was far better.
Yeah, I do too. Just gotta hope Asha feels the same way.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:24 pm
by BioEBear2010
Whoa you three (Kronk, Kretzy, and Krack [misspelled for the alliteration]) have taken over this thread.

Also, spelling and grammer is overrated.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:25 pm
by crackberry
BioEBear2010 wrote:Whoa you three (Kronk, Kretzy, and Krack [misspelled for the alliteration]) have taken over this thread.

Also, spelling and grammer is overrated.
Nice move.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:28 pm
by Kretzy
BioEBear2010 wrote:Whoa you three (Kronk, Kretzy, and Krack [misspelled for the alliteration]) have taken over this thread.

Also, spelling and grammer is overrated.
Yeah, we just finalized our big campus music festival today, and spring break starts tomorrow, so I've got nothing to do.

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:31 pm
by BioEBear2010
crackberry wrote: Nice move.
Thanks :D
Kretzy wrote: Yeah, we just finalized our big campus music festival today, and spring break starts tomorrow, so I've got nothing to do.
I have a boatload of problem sets and midterms to study for, so I'm distracting myself. This is the storm before the calm.