Stanford 2010!!!

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:18 pm

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:Also, to quote adameus from the Chicago vs. NYU thread:

adameus wrote:wow it seems any thread on here longer than 2 pages gets hijacked by people talking about vaguely related issues and crackberry coming in to whore/troll for Stanford. I don't think crack even has a friend who was considering between Chi and NYU, he just wanted to have a reason to come in here and weasel in some Stanford trolling :P

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=100


Really proud of that one eh, boss?

No, not particularly, but I think it qualifies me as "infamous," which, to be fair, is not a good thing.


Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28130
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:19 pm

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:Also, given your "definitions" from the "dictionary," I'd wonder why you're bragging about yourself being an infamous poaster. I believe this proves my point. If not, you're giving yourself far too much credit for annoying people. The only person you successfully troll is me.

When you hear the words "Stanford" and "TLS" who is the first poster you think of?


Doesn't make either of you disreputable. Note that I don't care about intricacies in definition, but you tend to correct my internet grammar so often I feel obligated.

TBF, your grammar sucks.


I hate you.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28130
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:20 pm

Kretzy wrote:Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.


I know right? And the prole doesn't even have 4000 poasts yet.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:21 pm

Kretzy wrote:Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.

My life is complete.
Kronk wrote:I hate you.

See above line.

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:24 pm

Kretzy wrote:Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28130
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:24 pm

crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:26 pm

Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?


You go/went to Berkeley don't/didn't you?

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:27 pm

Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?


Egregious anti-anal trolling.

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:28 pm

Kretzy wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?


Egregious anti-anal trolling.



You went there.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28130
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:30 pm

Kretzy wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?


Egregious anti-anal trolling.


180.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28130
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:31 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?


You go/went to Berkeley don't/didn't you?


No, crackberry's advances on my grammar just make me simmer with rage. I was 33% English major in UG, so that's pretty much all we have.

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:38 pm

Kronk wrote:
ConMan345 wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?


You go/went to Berkeley don't/didn't you?


No, crackberry's advances on my grammar just make me simmer with rage. I was 33% English major in UG, so that's pretty much all we have.


Funny how that's all we have yet we were (probably) never directly taught grammar in college. I think I also learned how to write coherently and succinctly. Judge Motz of the 9th Circuit said, "For law, just remember your ABCs: accuracy, brevity and clarity. It's as simple and as difficult as that." I think English took care of the latter two, law school will fill in the first.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:40 pm

Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?

Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.
Last edited by crackberry on Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:45 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
Kretzy wrote:Crackberry has actually transcended Stanford-trolling and now is self-trolling.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros

Wow, that thing is awesome.

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:48 pm

crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?

Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.


Emphasis on slightly debilitating?

;)

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:49 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
Kretzy wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?


Egregious anti-anal trolling.



You went there.


Yeah. I normally self-censor on these boards. In real-life, I have no standards of appropriateness. I hope I don't embarrass myself too thoroughly in front of our third tomorrow, Kronk.
Last edited by Kretzy on Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mochafury
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:32 am

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby mochafury » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:50 pm

Can we momentarily stop chewing each other's lollipops so that the damn thread doesn't bump? I don't mind poasting, but NOT ON TUESDAYS AND FRIDAYS in the Stanford thread. As it is, I pull my phone out of my pocket with lightning speed. Who knows what could happen if I grabbed something else by accident.

User avatar
ConMan345
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby ConMan345 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:52 pm

mochafury wrote:Can we momentarily stop chewing each other's lollipops so that the damn thread doesn't bump? I don't mind poasting, but NOT ON TUESDAYS AND FRIDAYS in the Stanford thread. As it is, I pull my phone out of my pocket with lightning speed. Who knows what could happen if I grabbed something else by accident.



Keep 'em coming.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:52 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?

Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.


Emphasis on slightly debilitating?

;)

Damn. Started to write "getting under your skin," before I remembered the "egregious anti-anal trolling" comment and so thought better of it.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28130
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kronk » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:52 pm

ConMan345 wrote:
crackberry wrote:
Kronk wrote:crack, at what point in your life did you develop extreme anal-retentiveness for message board poasts? Was it the $60,000 per year you paid for prep school, or the fact that you had to grade your own papers at STTTanford because the teachers don't give anything less than As?

Both my parents were professional editors, I have a slightly debilitating case of OCD and there you have it.

Plus, I like getting yanking your chain in particular.

As an aside, I almost wrote my Yale 250 on my OCD, but I'm glad I didn't.


Emphasis on slightly debilitating?

;)


Well played and fully appreciated.

And I think your current 250 topic was far better.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:54 pm

Kronk wrote:And I think your current 250 topic was far better.

Yeah, I do too. Just gotta hope Asha feels the same way.

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:24 pm

Whoa you three (Kronk, Kretzy, and Krack [misspelled for the alliteration]) have taken over this thread.

Also, spelling and grammer is overrated.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby crackberry » Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:25 pm

BioEBear2010 wrote:Whoa you three (Kronk, Kretzy, and Krack [misspelled for the alliteration]) have taken over this thread.

Also, spelling and grammer is overrated.

Nice move.

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby Kretzy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:28 pm

BioEBear2010 wrote:Whoa you three (Kronk, Kretzy, and Krack [misspelled for the alliteration]) have taken over this thread.

Also, spelling and grammer is overrated.


Yeah, we just finalized our big campus music festival today, and spring break starts tomorrow, so I've got nothing to do.

User avatar
BioEBear2010
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Stanford 2010!!!

Postby BioEBear2010 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:31 pm

crackberry wrote:Nice move.

Thanks :D

Kretzy wrote:Yeah, we just finalized our big campus music festival today, and spring break starts tomorrow, so I've got nothing to do.

I have a boatload of problem sets and midterms to study for, so I'm distracting myself. This is the storm before the calm.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”