Stanford 2010!!! Forum
- nixxers
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:47 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
jeebus, i look away from the stanford thread for like 2 days and it explodes in crazy
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I'm too lazy to scroll back. What did I miss? Another epic squabble between CB and Kronk?
- bloodonthetracks
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
do rejections come via email or post?
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Snail mail.bloodonthetracks wrote:do rejections come via email or post?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Yep.CardinalRules wrote:I'm too lazy to scroll back. What did I miss? Another epic squabble between CB and Kronk?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Shaggier1
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:57 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Same boat. Applied 10/20. Should be auto-reject. Confused and filled with false hope.still wondering why i havent been dinged / heard anything yet...been complete since oct, anyone else in my same boat?
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I don't think it is false hope. You said yourself that you put countless hours into your PS, and I am convinced that SLS pays great attention to them. If Stanford comes through, what's the chance you choose it over Berkeley?Shaggier1 wrote:Same boat. Applied 10/20. Should be auto-reject. Confused and filled with false hope.still wondering why i havent been dinged / heard anything yet...been complete since oct, anyone else in my same boat?
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:49 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Does anyone have a clue/care to speculate on the percentage of total offers Stanford will make that they have already put out?
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
60-70%, I would guess, going by LSN.frankjones wrote:Does anyone have a clue/care to speculate on the percentage of total offers Stanford will make that they have already put out?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
A quick update (numbers courtesy of LSN):
Stanford: 40 acceptances
Yale: 21 acceptances
These numbers exclude obvious flames.
Stanford: 40 acceptances
Yale: 21 acceptances
These numbers exclude obvious flames.
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Oh hai, Shaggier!Shaggier1 wrote:Same boat. Applied 10/20. Should be auto-reject. Confused and filled with false hope.still wondering why i havent been dinged / heard anything yet...been complete since oct, anyone else in my same boat?
Maybe NorCal schools are your niche? Are you going to Boalt ASW?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Last year:crackberry wrote:A quick update (numbers courtesy of LSN):
Stanford: 40 acceptances
Yale: 21 acceptances
These numbers exclude obvious flames.
Stanford: 63 acceptances
Yale: 49 acceptances
Didn't check for flames.
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Last year total or last year at this time?crackberry wrote:Last year:crackberry wrote:A quick update (numbers courtesy of LSN):
Stanford: 40 acceptances
Yale: 21 acceptances
These numbers exclude obvious flames.
Stanford: 63 acceptances
Yale: 49 acceptances
Didn't check for flames.
(excuse my laziness)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
groundbreaking admission that will shake tls to its core:
i secretly applied to stanford and am still waiting to hear back. i fully expect them to reject my ttt gpa without so much as a second glance, but a call from palo alto could certainly make my life more complicated.
for someone interested in ny big law, does it to any extent make sense to consider the west coast king over harvard?
i secretly applied to stanford and am still waiting to hear back. i fully expect them to reject my ttt gpa without so much as a second glance, but a call from palo alto could certainly make my life more complicated.
for someone interested in ny big law, does it to any extent make sense to consider the west coast king over harvard?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Total.ConMan345 wrote:Last year total or last year at this time?crackberry wrote:Last year:crackberry wrote:A quick update (numbers courtesy of LSN):
Stanford: 40 acceptances
Yale: 21 acceptances
These numbers exclude obvious flames.
Stanford: 63 acceptances
Yale: 49 acceptances
Didn't check for flames.
(excuse my laziness)
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
!!!!!APimpNamedSlickback wrote:groundbreaking admission that will shake tls to its core:
i secretly applied to stanford and am still waiting to hear back. i fully expect them to reject my ttt gpa without so much as a second glance, but a call from palo alto could certainly make my life more complicated.
for someone interested in ny big law, does it to any extent make sense to consider the west coast king over harvard?
Maybe, if you'd like to live in California for a few years. Probably not though.
I'm really happy you posted this. When'd you submit?
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Controlling for the increase in LSN users, controlling for the proportion of that increase applying to SLS/YLS, controlling for the relative caliber of the users from last year to this, controlling for the distribution of acceptances over the respective cycles, this is pretty darn useful.crackberry wrote:Last year:crackberry wrote:A quick update (numbers courtesy of LSN):
Stanford: 40 acceptances
Yale: 21 acceptances
These numbers exclude obvious flames.
Stanford: 63 acceptances
Yale: 49 acceptances
Didn't check for flames.
(in all seriousness, most of this will be a wash, save the difference in LSN users--data on that?)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
i guess at this point i'm just curious to see if they'll let me in, perhaps for financial aid leverage if nothing else. i really just want to work at a v5 pretty badly, so it sounds like H is the way to go unless someone would bother to persuade me otherwise.crackberry wrote:!!!!!APimpNamedSlickback wrote:groundbreaking admission that will shake tls to its core:
i secretly applied to stanford and am still waiting to hear back. i fully expect them to reject my ttt gpa without so much as a second glance, but a call from palo alto could certainly make my life more complicated.
for someone interested in ny big law, does it to any extent make sense to consider the west coast king over harvard?
Maybe, if you'd like to live in California for a few years.
have you gotten into yale yet?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I think it's more telling about YLS than SLS. I think it's believable that Stanford still has 1/3 of its acceptances left to give out. But does Yale really still have 60 percent of its acceptances outstanding? That would be sort of incredible.ConMan345 wrote:Controlling for the increase in LSN users, controlling for the proportion of that increase applying to SLS/YLS, controlling for the relative caliber of the users from last year to this, controlling for the distribution of acceptances over the respective cycles, this is pretty darn useful.
(in all seriousness, most of this will be a wash, save the difference in LSN users--data on that?)
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I'm glad you're trying so hard to hide your penchant for prestige-whoring.APimpNamedSlickback wrote:i guess at this point i'm just curious to see if they'll let me in, perhaps for financial aid leverage if nothing else. i really just want to work at a v5 pretty badly, so it sounds like H is the way to go unless someone would bother to persuade me otherwise.
have you gotten into yale yet?
And no, I have not.
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
"The bulk of our admissions decisions are made this month"crackberry wrote:I think it's more telling about YLS than SLS. I think it's believable that Stanford still has 1/3 of its acceptances left to give out. But does Yale really still have 60 percent of its acceptances outstanding? That would be sort of incredible.ConMan345 wrote:Controlling for the increase in LSN users, controlling for the proportion of that increase applying to SLS/YLS, controlling for the relative caliber of the users from last year to this, controlling for the distribution of acceptances over the respective cycles, this is pretty darn useful.
(in all seriousness, most of this will be a wash, save the difference in LSN users--data on that?)
From the Yale blog. If we take "bulk" to mean "most," 60% could be right
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
True. Wow, well that's sort of encouraging.ConMan345 wrote:"The bulk of our admissions decisions are made this month"crackberry wrote:I think it's more telling about YLS than SLS. I think it's believable that Stanford still has 1/3 of its acceptances left to give out. But does Yale really still have 60 percent of its acceptances outstanding? That would be sort of incredible.ConMan345 wrote:Controlling for the increase in LSN users, controlling for the proportion of that increase applying to SLS/YLS, controlling for the relative caliber of the users from last year to this, controlling for the distribution of acceptances over the respective cycles, this is pretty darn useful.
(in all seriousness, most of this will be a wash, save the difference in LSN users--data on that?)
From the Yale blog. If we take "bulk" to mean "most," 60% could be right
- Dignan
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I have some it's-worth-what-you-pay-for-it advice. If I got into Stanford (which I didn't) and if I wanted a career in ny big law (which I don't), I would pick Stanford over Harvard. Why? Because I think Stanford is a better law school and because I prefer its learning environment to Harvard's. And I would probably have more success in the school I liked better, which would make me a more attractive candidate for a big law job in NY.APimpNamedSlickback wrote:groundbreaking admission that will shake tls to its core:
i secretly applied to stanford and am still waiting to hear back. i fully expect them to reject my ttt gpa without so much as a second glance, but a call from palo alto could certainly make my life more complicated.
for someone interested in ny big law, does it to any extent make sense to consider the west coast king over harvard?
Harvard and Stanford are peer schools. If you're into Harvard, go there. If you think you'd like Stanford better, go there instead. It's not rocket science.
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Yeah, but in the way that, if you're a 5, a 10 winks at you in a bar.crackberry wrote:True. Wow, well that's sort of encouraging.ConMan345 wrote:"The bulk of our admissions decisions are made this month"crackberry wrote:I think it's more telling about YLS than SLS. I think it's believable that Stanford still has 1/3 of its acceptances left to give out. But does Yale really still have 60 percent of its acceptances outstanding? That would be sort of incredible.ConMan345 wrote:Controlling for the increase in LSN users, controlling for the proportion of that increase applying to SLS/YLS, controlling for the relative caliber of the users from last year to this, controlling for the distribution of acceptances over the respective cycles, this is pretty darn useful.
(in all seriousness, most of this will be a wash, save the difference in LSN users--data on that?)
From the Yale blog. If we take "bulk" to mean "most," 60% could be right
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
fair enough, although i was really hoping for someone to point me toward quantitative comparisons of their respective career placementDignan wrote:I have some it's-worth-what-you-pay-for-it advice. If I got into Stanford (which I didn't) and if I wanted a career in ny big law (which I don't), I would pick Stanford over Harvard. Why? Because I think Stanford is a better law school and because I prefer its learning environment to Harvard's. And I would probably have more success in the school I liked better, which would make me a more attractive candidate for a big law job in NY.APimpNamedSlickback wrote:groundbreaking admission that will shake tls to its core:
i secretly applied to stanford and am still waiting to hear back. i fully expect them to reject my ttt gpa without so much as a second glance, but a call from palo alto could certainly make my life more complicated.
for someone interested in ny big law, does it to any extent make sense to consider the west coast king over harvard?
Harvard and Stanford are peer schools. If you're into Harvard, go there. If you think you'd like Stanford better, go there instead. It's not rocket science.
but dont bother unless you're already intellectually interested in comparing the two schools since my decision has all but been made and i am interested in this stuff almost entirely out of curiosity. i dont have a snowball's chance at stanford.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login