blue5385 wrote:managamy wrote:blue5385 wrote:
But where is the evidence that they do care about anything other than rankings?
What is the reasoning flaw in the conclusion drawn by blue3585?
A) He fails to adequately define the terms "evidence" and "rankings."
B) He confuses the situation that there is no proof that an assertion is true with the situation that there is proof that the assertion is false.
C) He confuses a hypothesis with a fact supported by evidence.
D) He assumes that law school admissions operate according to a system that is easily comprehensible to the average mortal.
E) He assumes that NYU and CLS are not distinguishable from any other law school in their admissions practices.
The answer is B.
fyi Managamy, I'm a girl
Oops. I love your avatar, btw.