Columbia 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
violaboy
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:02 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby violaboy » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:58 pm

hopefullaw27 wrote:he probably had some disciplinary action. dean's cert. not necessary for applicant who didn't have any anomalies


This.

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:58 pm

violaboy wrote:
hopefullaw27 wrote:he probably had some disciplinary action. dean's cert. not necessary for applicant who didn't have any anomalies


This.


I like how you have mentioned this several times ITT and every time people freak out.

taylor
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:05 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby taylor » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:59 pm

In! (LSAT 172, GPA 3.6x)

User avatar
maudlinstreet
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby maudlinstreet » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:00 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
violaboy wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:
violaboy wrote:There are some RD admissions up on LSN. And at least one is legit because I know him.


Which profile do you know is real?


Thales


That's shocking they would be already pulling in RD people.

yeah, that's kind of exciting/nervewracking actually. I was expecting to wait another month at least before I heard, but I'm not gonna complain if I hear sooner!

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:01 pm

taylor wrote:In! (LSAT 172, GPA 3.6x)


When were you notified?

hopefullaw27
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:50 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby hopefullaw27 » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:02 pm

taylor were you ED?

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:02 pm

ok listen maybe i've been burned but i am NOT going to freak out this time. i am going to wait until multiple legit people have come on saying they got in RD before i freak out.

im waiting.

that's it.

waiting.

not freaking.

taylor
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:05 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby taylor » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:05 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
taylor wrote:In! (LSAT 172, GPA 3.6x)


When were you notified?


The e-mail came at 11am and I was ED.

User avatar
violaboy
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:02 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby violaboy » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:06 pm

My friend that got in RD said that he just checked his status checker and that told him that he was admitted.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:07 pm

violaboy wrote:My friend that got in RD said that he just checked his status checker and that told him that he was admitted.


i was under the impression that CLS status checkers dont say anything after you go complete.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:08 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
violaboy wrote:My friend that got in RD said that he just checked his status checker and that told him that he was admitted.


i was under the impression that CLS status checkers dont say anything after you go complete.


and their status checker says "Please note that decisions will not be available online; rather, all applicants will receive their decisions by mail. " (not that i checked anyway)

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:08 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
violaboy wrote:My friend that got in RD said that he just checked his status checker and that told him that he was admitted.


i was under the impression that CLS status checkers dont say anything after you go complete.


Yeah, that's what I've heard.

User avatar
babaghanouj
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:20 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby babaghanouj » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:09 pm

violaboy wrote:My friend that got in RD said that he just checked his status checker and that told him that he was admitted.

From status checker: "Please note that decisions will not be available online; rather, all applicants will receive their decisions by mail."

Edit: beat me to it.
Last edited by babaghanouj on Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:10 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
violaboy wrote:My friend that got in RD said that he just checked his status checker and that told him that he was admitted.


i was under the impression that CLS status checkers dont say anything after you go complete.


Yeah, that's what I've heard.


thus, still waiting. and still not freaking.

User avatar
violaboy
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:02 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby violaboy » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:10 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
violaboy wrote:My friend that got in RD said that he just checked his status checker and that told him that he was admitted.


i was under the impression that CLS status checkers dont say anything after you go complete.


Yeah, that's what I've heard.


thus, still waiting. and still not freaking.


Hmmm, let me ask. He's not one to lie.

frankjones
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:49 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby frankjones » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:11 pm

I submitted around 11/15. I've checked online and it looks like everything's been received, but I've you to get an email saying my application is complete. Do they send those? If so, how long does it take to go complete?

APimpNamedSlickback
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby APimpNamedSlickback » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:12 pm

Image

User avatar
justice4me
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:56 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby justice4me » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:13 pm

This is getting too nerve-wracking. Can't we just sign another contract promising to abide by the admissions decisions of M51 and Helmholtz?

Providing, of course, that they let us in. :)

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:14 pm

justice4me wrote:This is getting too nerve-wracking. Can't we just sign another contract promising to abide by the admissions decisions of M51 and Helmholtz?

Providing, of course, that they let us in. :)


helm would reject us all so he can keep all the CLS to himself.

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:14 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
justice4me wrote:This is getting too nerve-wracking. Can't we just sign another contract promising to abide by the admissions decisions of M51 and Helmholtz?

Providing, of course, that they let us in. :)


helm would reject us all so he can keep all the CLS to himself.


titcr

On the other hand, I do have a "holistic" "admissions" "process" in mind that seems agreeable.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:15 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
justice4me wrote:This is getting too nerve-wracking. Can't we just sign another contract promising to abide by the admissions decisions of M51 and Helmholtz?

Providing, of course, that they let us in. :)


helm would reject us all so he can keep all the CLS to himself.


titcr


though if you WERE an adcomm, the combination of your power and your 'tar would have every girl here swooning. just sayin'

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:17 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:titcr


On the other hand, I do have a "holistic" "admissions" "process" in mind that seems agreeable.


though if you WERE an adcomm, the combination of your power and your 'tar would have every girl here swooning. just sayin'


to be fair, I have been swooning over helm since before it was cool.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:20 pm

puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:titcr


On the other hand, I do have a "holistic" "admissions" "process" in mind that seems agreeable.


though if you WERE an adcomm, the combination of your power and your 'tar would have every girl here swooning. just sayin'


to be fair, I have been swooning over helm since before it was cool.


well i was never a get on the bandwagon type of girl before, but...

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:20 pm

puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:titcr


On the other hand, I do have a "holistic" "admissions" "process" in mind that seems agreeable.


though if you WERE an adcomm, the combination of your power and your 'tar would have every girl here swooning. just sayin'


to be fair, I have been swooning over helm since before it was cool.


Back in the day when I was powerless, yet still tolerated by most posters. It took me becoming mod and having my own hate group form for people to notice me.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:26 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:titcr


On the other hand, I do have a "holistic" "admissions" "process" in mind that seems agreeable.


though if you WERE an adcomm, the combination of your power and your 'tar would have every girl here swooning. just sayin'


to be fair, I have been swooning over helm since before it was cool.


Back in the day when I was powerless, yet still tolerated by most posters. It took me becoming mod and having my own hate group form for people to notice me.


pssh dont flatter yourself. it's not the mod status, its just the tar.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cd1945, Chipotle85, lillawyer2, mjm1315, Nickel94, pandaaa, pantsuitchic, potterotter, ramp_999, studyingeveryday and 18 guests