Columbia 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby crackberry » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:46 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:held.

Wow. A bloodbath.

User avatar
booboo
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby booboo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:48 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:held.


This thread is making me sad for you guys...

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:49 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:held.


:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

again, panic in the ranks. sorry pup.

i didn't know CLS YP'd

User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby kittenmittons » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:50 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:held.


oh fuck that

User avatar
booboo
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby booboo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:50 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
puppleberry finn wrote:held.


:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

again, panic in the ranks. sorry pup.

i didn't know CLS YP'd


Not quite a YP, will probably hear a decision by April if she does not withdraw.

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:51 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
puppleberry finn wrote:held.


:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

again, panic in the ranks. sorry pup.

i didn't know CLS YP'd



it's okay, I was no doubt a shitty fit for CLS anyway. Now I guess I should concentrate on my H LOCI and breathe a sigh of relief about avoiding NYC real estate.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27945
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Kronk » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:54 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
puppleberry finn wrote:held.


:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

again, panic in the ranks. sorry pup.

i didn't know CLS YP'd



it's okay, I was no doubt a shitty fit for CLS anyway. Now I guess I should concentrate on my H LOCI and breathe a sigh of relief about avoiding NYC real estate.


I'm wondering if CLS stalks the boards and noticed all the anti-NYC posts me and puppins wrote months ago.

(I don't mind trying something new, CLS!)

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:57 pm

Kronk wrote:I'm wondering if CLS stalks the boards and noticed all the anti-NYC posts me and puppins wrote months ago.

(I don't mind trying something new, CLS!)



dear CLS:

my elitist love of ivies outweighs my fear of NYC, please reconsider

xoxo

User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby kittenmittons » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:58 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:
Kronk wrote:I'm wondering if CLS stalks the boards and noticed all the anti-NYC posts me and puppins wrote months ago.

(I don't mind trying something new, CLS!)



dear CLS:

my elitist love of ivies outweighs my fear of NYC, please reconsider

xoxo


Bust out a new edition of the calendar imo. I'll go in the bathroom and start snapping pics right away.

User avatar
$1.99
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby $1.99 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:59 pm

oh man i guess i will be getting bad news too since i am one of the lowest ranks in our chain

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:59 pm

kittenmittons wrote:Bust out a new edition of the calendar imo. I'll go in the bathroom and start snapping pics right away.


KM + PF: the at-work-in-the-bathroom-mirror edition (now with Jan-March 2011!)

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27945
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Kronk » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:00 pm

Puppins--withdrawing out of spite or staying on hold?

User avatar
$1.99
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby $1.99 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:00 pm

and what are they doing this year? why are they holding such strong applicants and letting in weak numbers?

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:01 pm

Kronk wrote:withdrawing out of spite or staying on hold?


I don't see why I wouldn't stay on hold. in fact, I will write a LOCI. my first choice doesn't appear to be giving me money so it's time to start whoring myself out to higher ranked schools out of desperation.

User avatar
$1.99
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby $1.99 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:07 pm

puppleberry, what were your stats if you dont mind

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:08 pm

$1.99 wrote:puppleberry, what were your stats if you dont mind


>75%

User avatar
booboo
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby booboo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:08 pm

I think this is a yield protect play. This lets them conserve their yield rate, where the higher applicants (non Hamilton/Butlers) may withdraw after being held. This way, they can accurately gauge the interest and help their numbers.

goodolgil
Posts: 923
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:01 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby goodolgil » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:08 pm

Waitlisted/reserve. Nice letter though, actually made me think I have a shot of getting off of it, even though I'm sure I don't. 169/3.85.

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:11 pm

booboo wrote:I think this is a yield protect play. This lets them conserve their yield rate, where the higher applicants (non Hamilton/Butlers) may withdraw after being held. This way, they can accurately gauge the interest and help their numbers.


or I just suck. please don't discount this viable option.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27945
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Kronk » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:11 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:
booboo wrote:I think this is a yield protect play. This lets them conserve their yield rate, where the higher applicants (non Hamilton/Butlers) may withdraw after being held. This way, they can accurately gauge the interest and help their numbers.


or I just suck. please don't discount this viable option.


+1 for me.

User avatar
booboo
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby booboo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:12 pm

puppleberry finn wrote:
booboo wrote:I think this is a yield protect play. This lets them conserve their yield rate, where the higher applicants (non Hamilton/Butlers) may withdraw after being held. This way, they can accurately gauge the interest and help their numbers.


or I just suck. please don't discount this viable option.


If you suck, then I am pretty sure...

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:14 pm

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
DallasCowboy
Posts: 650
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:47 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby DallasCowboy » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:16 pm

after rejections from UVA and Stanford today, I just want to be Held. :|

User avatar
booboo
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby booboo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:17 pm

DallasCowboy wrote:after rejections from UVA and Stanford today, I just want to be Held. :|


I hope that that is a play on words, and if so, hai.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 27945
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Kronk » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:18 pm

--ImageRemoved--




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Redsfan320 and 7 guests