Re: Columbia 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:49 pm
3.8 index. Get excited!!
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=87103
4.156 - Looks like we're in the same (sinking) boat!Kiersten1985 wrote:4.138
But I waaaaaaaannnntttt iiiiittttttt so baaaaaaad!!
+1 with a 4.2xcountryjunkie wrote:4.156 - Looks like we're in the same (sinking) boat!Kiersten1985 wrote:4.138
But I waaaaaaaannnntttt iiiiittttttt so baaaaaaad!!
How do you figure out what your index is? From LSP?CanadianEH wrote:4.5 index, splitter-ish. Still no word, although I applied after getting my Dec. LSAT score.
i believe it's on the CLS LSAC report (bottom left corner?)democrattotheend wrote:How do you figure out what your index is? From LSP?CanadianEH wrote:4.5 index, splitter-ish. Still no word, although I applied after getting my Dec. LSAT score.
i think 4.4+ is safe territory (historically) for an admit. it is the scale used by the ad-comm to rank applicants based on numbersDanInALionsDen wrote:My index is a 4.3? What does this index thing even mean?
Yup. I got the envelope yesterday and mine still says complete.blue5385 wrote:apparently it stops at 'Complete'...I had the same question and this is what other people told me.MY FILES! wrote:Anyone know if the Columbia status checker switches to "Under Review" at any point? Does it just stop at "Complete" and then you receive an envelope?
Historically, yes. Last year, no. Only 2/3 of people with our numbers 3.9-ish / 173 were admitted. However, a consolation is that most of the people not admitted got at least one of HYS. Strangely, almost everyone 3.6-3.8 / 173 were admitted.englawyer wrote:i think 4.4+ is safe territory (historically) for an admit. it is the scale used by the ad-comm to rank applicants based on numbersDanInALionsDen wrote:My index is a 4.3? What does this index thing even mean?
I doubt they YP since they have a 32% yield. Just awkward. I've been kind of worried about CLS ever since I saw the graph: http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/blue5385 wrote:That seems really weird...YP?VoidSix wrote:Historically, yes. Last year, no. Only 2/3 of people with our numbers 3.9-ish / 173 were admitted. However, a consolation is that most of the people not admitted got at least one of HYS. Strangely, almost everyone 3.6-3.8 / 173 were admitted.
i did notice that as well...very strange trend. it does look like 07/08 is a bit more clear though. do you know if shoshana or maggiebrie got in? (similar numbers)VoidSix wrote:I doubt they YP since they have a 32% yield. Just awkward. I've been kind of worried about CLS ever since I saw the graph: http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/blue5385 wrote:That seems really weird...YP?VoidSix wrote:Historically, yes. Last year, no. Only 2/3 of people with our numbers 3.9-ish / 173 were admitted. However, a consolation is that most of the people not admitted got at least one of HYS. Strangely, almost everyone 3.6-3.8 / 173 were admitted.
Yeah, but probably only because they haven't started WLs and rejections yet.englawyer wrote:it also looks like a nice thick sea of green there on this year's graph. hmm..