Columbia 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:00 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
crackberry wrote:HEY GUYS!!!! WHEN DO YOU THINK WE'LL START HEARING BACK?!?!


i read this as "CAPITAL LETTERS = SOMETHING THAT MATTERS"

unfortunately i was wrong.

Eh, that was sort of the point.

georgina
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby georgina » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:09 pm

but seriously, at least it seems like the office is really getting to work. i, too, got an email asking to clarify some stuff. it did seem weird to me that they asked me to just email the information back. like, is there someone really going through admissions@law.columbia.edu checking individual emails? that's gotta be a nightmare inbox.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:11 pm

it sort of makes me sad that they haven't emailed me for anything. like 'oh, there's nothing more we want to hear about this girl.'

georgina
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby georgina » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:13 pm

gahthelaw wrote:it sort of makes me sad that they haven't emailed me for anything. like 'oh, there's nothing more we want to hear about this girl.'


i dunno, i see the update thing as something that now delays my app, which is sort of a bummer. so of course, i dropped all work and got them everything they needed within an hour.

User avatar
WhiskeyGuy
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby WhiskeyGuy » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:18 pm

Hey everyone, any word on decisions?

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:18 pm

DID WE ALL GET INTO COLUMBIA YET?!

User avatar
UrbanAchievers
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:02 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby UrbanAchievers » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:30 pm

georgina wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:it sort of makes me sad that they haven't emailed me for anything. like 'oh, there's nothing more we want to hear about this girl.'


i dunno, i see the update thing as something that now delays my app, which is sort of a bummer. so of course, i dropped all work and got them everything they needed within an hour.


nm
Last edited by UrbanAchievers on Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:54 pm

Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all (with the possible exception of Harvard)?

User avatar
Lurkster
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Lurkster » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:23 pm

crackberry wrote:Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


I don't think so, because I'm over their 75th and they probably wouldn't even let me lick the boots of their adcom members, let alone let me in the school.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:38 pm

Lurkster wrote:
crackberry wrote:Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


I don't think so, because I'm over their 75th and they probably wouldn't even let me lick the boots of their adcom members, let alone let me in the school.

Do you have like a 2.2?

Let me rephrase: Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all, provided you have at least a 3.4 or 3.5 (with the possible exception of Harvard)?

User avatar
WhiskeyGuy
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby WhiskeyGuy » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:08 pm

Hey everyone. It's been a couple hours, just seeing if anyone has heard anything.

User avatar
Lurkster
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Lurkster » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:11 pm

crackberry wrote:
Lurkster wrote:
crackberry wrote:Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


I don't think so, because I'm over their 75th and they probably wouldn't even let me lick the boots of their adcom members, let alone let me in the school.

Do you have like a 2.2?

Let me rephrase: Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all, provided you have at least a 3.4 or 3.5 (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


3.1. I'm sending an app anyway. Should be fun!

User avatar
Hattori Hanzo
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:17 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Hattori Hanzo » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:16 pm

crackberry wrote:
Lurkster wrote:
crackberry wrote:Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


I don't think so, because I'm over their 75th and they probably wouldn't even let me lick the boots of their adcom members, let alone let me in the school.

Do you have like a 2.2?

Let me rephrase: Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all, provided you have at least a 3.4 or 3.5 (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


Only if that was true of Harvard.....

User avatar
UrbanAchievers
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:02 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby UrbanAchievers » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:17 pm

WhiskeyGuy wrote:Hey everyone. It's been a couple hours, just seeing if anyone has heard anything.


Nope. How 'bout you?

User avatar
AngryAvocado
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby AngryAvocado » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:23 pm

crackberry wrote:
Lurkster wrote:
crackberry wrote:Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


I don't think so, because I'm over their 75th and they probably wouldn't even let me lick the boots of their adcom members, let alone let me in the school.

Do you have like a 2.2?

Let me rephrase: Have we established that Columbia is the biggest LSAT whore of them all, provided you have at least a 3.4 or 3.5 (with the possible exception of Harvard)?


I think this year might be a bit different. If the ED pool this year was any indication, Columbia's selectivity is going to make a pretty noticeable jump. I have >175 LSAT and a 3.4x from a T30 UG, and I was deferred ED (along with a couple others with similar stats). I also have pretty decent softs, including some atypical corporate work experience and such. Keep in mind that, in the past, ED plus a >173 LSAT was almost an autoadmit provided a non-horrific GPA.

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby 02082010 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:27 pm

In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

User avatar
AngryAvocado
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby AngryAvocado » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:28 pm

hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I stand corrected.

psychomohel
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:02 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby psychomohel » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:30 pm

hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Eh, once you try it in another thread, it doesn't really work anymore.
Last edited by psychomohel on Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rockchalk86
Posts: 528
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby rockchalk86 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:31 pm

psychomohel wrote:[
hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Eh, once you try it in another thread, it doesn't really work anymore.


Twice... really?

psychomohel
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:02 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby psychomohel » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:32 pm

rockchalk86 wrote:
psychomohel wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Eh, once you try it in another thread, it doesn't really work anymore.


Twice... really?


Yeah, in the NYU thread he posted a fake IN message. It got everyone freaked out for a bit.

User avatar
Emma.
Posts: 2401
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Emma. » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:33 pm

hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Wait, what?

User avatar
rockchalk86
Posts: 528
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby rockchalk86 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:34 pm

psychomohel wrote:
rockchalk86 wrote:
psychomohel wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Eh, once you try it in another thread, it doesn't really work anymore.


Twice... really?


Yeah, in the NYU thread he posted a fake IN message. It got everyone freaked out for a bit.


Oh yeah... that was bullshit. This one isn't even close to believable.

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby 02082010 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:34 pm

psychomohel wrote:
rockchalk86 wrote:
psychomohel wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Eh, once you try it in another thread, it doesn't really work anymore.


Twice... really?


Yeah, in the NYU thread he posted a fake IN message. It got everyone freaked out for a bit.


:?

User avatar
Emma.
Posts: 2401
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Emma. » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:39 pm

psychomohel wrote:
rockchalk86 wrote:
psychomohel wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:In at COLUMBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Eh, once you try it in another thread, it doesn't really work anymore.


Twice... really?


Yeah, in the NYU thread he posted a fake IN message. It got everyone freaked out for a bit.


Image

User avatar
Nom Sawyer
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am

Re: Columbia 2010

Postby Nom Sawyer » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:51 pm

emrose wrote:Image


LoL yeah.. isn't this a bannable offense?




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests